An analysis of the provision of context within existing remote laboratories

被引:0
|
作者
Machet, Tania [1 ]
Lowe, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Informat Technol, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
来源
FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE), 2015 | 2015年
关键词
laboratory; remote; context; ADVANCE ORGANIZERS; ENVIRONMENTS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Laboratory work is a well-accepted component of science and engineering programs. One emerging trend has been the increasing utilisation of remotely accessed laboratories, where the students can remotely monitor and/or control physical apparatus, typically across the internet. This supports greater flexibility of access for students as well as the possibility of sharing of facilities between institutions. One additional benefit is greater flexibility in designing the learning context within which the laboratory can be positioned. As the interaction is computer mediated, it becomes simpler to modify this interface and hence change the laboratory context. Research has shown that context can have a significant effect on learning outcomes, students' retention of information, engagement with learning and on knowledge transfer from one domain to another (see, for example, [1],[2]). Despite this there has been little consideration given to understanding contextual information provided in laboratories in general and remote laboratories in particular. In this paper we report on an analysis of contextual information provided within remote laboratories. Consideration is given to the ways in which the contextual information provides a connection between the real-world concepts being explored and the laboratory as a proxy for those concepts. The analysis shows that there is a diverse range of approaches and representational forms and suggests a new taxonomy that may be useful in describing the context found in laboratory activities for future analysis and design.
引用
收藏
页码:1948 / 1956
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Smart Layer For Remote Laboratories
    Costa, Ricardo J.
    Alves, Gustavo R.
    Santos, Domingos S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONLINE ENGINEERING, 2007, 3 (03)
  • [22] Remote Laboratories on Mobile Robotics
    Zeiger, Florian
    Schilling, Klaus
    BULLETIN OF THE TECHNICAL COMMITTEE ON LEARNING TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 7 (03): : 33 - 35
  • [23] Remote laboratories for optical circuits
    Gurkan, Deniz
    Mickelson, Alan
    Benhaddou, Driss
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, 2008, 51 (01) : 53 - 60
  • [24] Blended learning and remote laboratories
    Thorsteinsson, Saemundur E.
    Andersen, Kristinn
    Geirsdottir, Gudrun
    Thorbergsson, Helgi
    Gudmundsson, Karl S.
    2018 28TH EAEEIE ANNUAL CONFERENCE (EAEEIE), 2018,
  • [25] Current Trends in Remote Laboratories
    Gomes, Luis
    Bogosyan, Seta
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2009, 56 (12) : 4744 - 4756
  • [26] Remote Laboratories Based on LXI
    Garcia-Zubia, J.
    Hernandez, U.
    Angulo, I.
    Orduna, P.
    Irurzun, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONLINE ENGINEERING, 2008, 4 (03) : 25 - 27
  • [27] Remote laboratories for control education
    Hahn, HH
    Spong, MW
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 39TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-5, 2000, : 895 - 900
  • [28] Real, remote and virtual laboratories
    Machotka, J
    Nedic, Z
    Carr, S
    8TH UICEE ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING EDUCATION, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS: BRINGING ENGINEERING EDUCATORS TOGETHER, 2005, : 223 - 226
  • [29] Mobile Application for Remote Laboratories
    Bistak, Pavol
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2015 3RD EXPERIMENT AT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE (EXP AT'15), 2015, : 276 - 281
  • [30] "Hands-on-Remote" Laboratories
    Lustig, Frantisek
    Brom, Pavel
    Kuriscak, Pavel
    Dvorak, Jiri
    SMART INDUSTRY & SMART EDUCATION, 2019, 47 : 118 - 127