Decontamination and Reuse of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators: Where Do We Stand?

被引:13
|
作者
Cassorla, Lydia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Anesthesia & Perioperat Care, 500 Parnassus Ave,Box 0648, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 2021年 / 132卷 / 01期
关键词
HEALTH-CARE WORKERS; HYDROGEN-PEROXIDE; PREVENTING INFLUENZA; SURGICAL MASK; EXTENDED USE; INACTIVATION; CORONAVIRUS; SARS; TRANSMISSION; PRECAUTIONS;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0000000000005254
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic created an extraordinary demand for N95 and similarly rated filtering facepiece respirators (FFR) that remains unmet due to limited stock, production constraints, and logistics. Interest in decontamination and reuse of FFR, a product class designed for single use in health care settings, has undergone a parallel surge due to shortages. A worthwhile decontamination method must provide effective inactivation of the targeted pathogen(s), and preserve particle filtration, mask fit, and safety for a subsequent user. This discussion reviews the background of the current shortage, classification, structure, and functional aspects of FFR, and potentially effective decontamination methods along with reference websites for those seeking updated information and guidance. The most promising techniques utilize heat, hydrogen peroxide, microwave-generated steam, or ultraviolet light. Many require special or repurposed equipment and a detailed operational roadmap specific to each setting. While limited, research is growing. There is significant variation between models with regard to the ability to withstand decontamination yet remain protective. The number of times an individual respirator can be reused is often limited by its ability to maintain a tight fit after multiple uses rather than by the decontamination method itself. There is no single solution for all settings; each individual or institution must choose according to their need, capability, and available resources. As the current pandemic is expected to continue for months to years, and the possibility of future airborne biologic threats persists, the need for plentiful, effective respiratory protection is stimulating research and innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 14
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] N95 filtering facepiece respirators do not reliably afford respiratory protection during chest compression: A simulation study
    Hwang, Sung Yeon
    Yoon, Hee
    Yoon, Aerin
    Kim, Taerim
    Lee, Guntak
    Jung, Kwang Yul
    Park, Joo Hyun
    Shin, Tae Gun
    Cha, Won Chul
    Sim, Min Seob
    Kim, Seonwoo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 38 (01): : 12 - 17
  • [42] Qualitative fit test outcomes for N95 filtering facepiece respirators in health care workers
    Wardhan, Richa
    Patel, Vrinda
    Neff, Andrew B.
    Cook, R. B.
    White, Jeffrey D.
    Vasilopoulos, Terrie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2023, 51 (02) : 194 - 198
  • [43] Integrated photothermal decontamination device for N95 respirators
    Marcelo Muñoz
    Maxime Comtois-Bona
    David Cortes
    Cagla Eren Cimenci
    Qiujiang Du
    Collin Thompson
    Juan David Figueroa
    Vivian Franklin
    Peter Liu
    Emilio I. Alarcon
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [44] Integrated photothermal decontamination device for N95 respirators
    Munoz, Marcelo
    Comtois-Bona, Maxime
    Cortes, David
    Cimenci, Cagla Eren
    Du, Qiujiang
    Thompson, Collin
    Figueroa, Juan David
    Franklin, Vivian
    Liu, Peter
    Alarcon, Emilio I.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [45] Challenge of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators with Viable H1N1 Influenza Aerosols
    Harnish, Delbert A.
    Heimbuch, Brian K.
    Husband, Michael
    Lumley, April E.
    Kinney, Kimberly
    Shaffer, Ronald E.
    Wander, Joseph D.
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 34 (05): : 494 - 499
  • [46] Surgical mask placement over N95 filtering facepiece respirators: Physiological effects on healthcare workers
    Roberge, Raymond J.
    Coca, Aitor
    Williams, W. Jon
    Palmiero, Andrew J.
    Powell, Jeffrey B.
    RESPIROLOGY, 2010, 15 (03) : 516 - 521
  • [47] Comparison of two quantitative fit-test methods using N95 filtering facepiece respirators
    Sietsema, Margaret
    Brosseau, Lisa M.
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HYGIENE, 2016, 13 (08) : 621 - 627
  • [48] Performance Comparison of N95 and P100 Filtering Facepiece Respirators with Presence of Artificial Leakage
    Zhu, Jintuo
    He, Xinjian
    Guffey, Steve
    Wang, Liang
    Wang, Haifeng
    Cheng, Jianwei
    ANNALS OF WORK EXPOSURES AND HEALTH, 2020, 64 (02) : 202 - 216
  • [49] Validation of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirator Decontamination Methods Available at a Large University Hospital
    Wigginton, Krista R.
    Arts, Peter J.
    Clack, Herek L.
    Fitzsimmons, William J.
    Gamba, Mirko
    Harrison, Katherine R.
    LeBar, William
    Lauring, Adam S.
    Li, Lucinda
    Roberts, William W.
    Rockey, Nicole C.
    Torreblanca, Jania
    Young, Carol
    Anderegg, Loic G.
    Cohn, Amy M.
    Doyle, John M.
    Meisenhelder, Cole M.
    Raskin, Lutgarde
    Love, Nancy G.
    Kaye, Keith S.
    OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 8 (02):
  • [50] Comparison of Fit for Sealed and Loose-Fitting Surgical Masks and N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators
    Karuppasamy, Karunakaravel
    Obuchowski, Nancy
    ANNALS OF WORK EXPOSURES AND HEALTH, 2021, 65 (04) : 463 - 474