A survey of time delay estimation performance bounds

被引:0
|
作者
Sadler, Brian M. [1 ]
Kozick, Richard J. [2 ]
机构
[1] USA, Res Lab, 2800 Powder Mill Rd, Adelphi, MD 20783 USA
[2] Bucknell Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Lewisburg, PA 17837 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
(1) In this paper we review performance bounds, as well as some current trends, in time delay estimation (TDE). Research over several decades reveals that a few key parameters determine TDE performance. The most basic are the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and the signal time-bandwidth (TB) product; larger values for each are desirable. The Cramer-Rao bound (CRB) reveals asymptotic maximum-likelihood estimation (MLE) behavior with respect to TB and SNR. At moderate to lower SNR, TDEs generally break down as ambiguities arise due to increased noise and the cross-correlation of the signal, causing the TDE to deviate (often quite sharply) away from the CRB. Because it is a local bound, the CRB does not indicate the threshold behavior, and Ziv-Zakai and other bounds have been developed to handle this. When TD is measured between multiple sensors, the coherence between them can fundamentally limit the result, an effect that occurs in acoustics due to the turbulent atmosphere. We discuss modifications to the classical bounds that accommodate the coherence loss, and reveal a threshold coherence phenomenon. When communications and other signals are utilized for TDE, they may have significant nuisance parameters, including carrier uncertainty, unknown symbols, as well as effects due to an unknown channel. Recent TDE performance limits reveal the effect of these parameters for various signal models, including the impact of diversity channels on TDE.
引用
收藏
页码:282 / +
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] THE STRUCTURE AND PERFORMANCE OF ESTIMATORS FOR REAL-TIME ESTIMATION OF RANDOMLY VARYING TIME-DELAY
    MEYR, H
    SPIES, G
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ACOUSTICS SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1984, 32 (01): : 81 - 94
  • [42] Simultaneous stabilization of discrete-time delay systems and bounds on delay margin
    Chen, Yuanye
    Zulfiqar, Adil
    Ma, Dan
    Shi, Yang
    Chen, Jie
    Allgoewer, Frank
    AUTOMATICA, 2019, 101 : 296 - 308
  • [43] Delay estimation for nonlinear time-delay systems
    Zheng, Gang
    Polyakov, Andrey
    Levant, Arie
    2016 14TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON VARIABLE STRUCTURE SYSTEMS (VSS), 2016, : 126 - 130
  • [44] LARGE AND SMALL ERROR PERFORMANCE LIMITS FOR MULTIPATH TIME-DELAY ESTIMATION
    IANNIELLO, JP
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ACOUSTICS SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1986, 34 (02): : 245 - 251
  • [45] PERFORMANCE PREDICTIONS FOR COHERENT AND INCOHERENT PROCESSING TECHNIQUES OF TIME-DELAY ESTIMATION
    SCARBROUGH, K
    TREMBLAY, RJ
    CARTER, GC
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ACOUSTICS SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1983, 31 (05): : 1191 - 1196
  • [46] Performance analysis of the estimation of time delay and Doppler stretch by wideband ambiguity function
    Yin, CY
    Xu, SJ
    Wang, DJ
    ICMMT'98: 1998 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MICROWAVE AND MILLIMETER WAVE TECHNOLOGY PROCEEDINGS, 1998, : 452 - 455
  • [47] On the Time-Delay Estimation Performance Limit of New GNSS Acquisition Codes
    Ortega, Lorenzo
    Vila-Valls, Jordi
    Chaumette, Eric
    Vincent, Francois
    2020 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LOCALIZATION AND GNSS (ICL-GNSS), 2020,
  • [48] Feedback-Invariant Approach to Time-Delay Estimation for Performance Monitoring
    Harrison, Christopher A.
    Qin, S. Joe
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2012, 51 (26) : 9094 - 9100
  • [49] Performance evaluation of time-delay estimation in non-Gaussian conditions
    Shor, G
    Messer, H
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING WORKSHOP ON HIGHER-ORDER STATISTICS, 1997, : 20 - 23
  • [50] ZIV-ZAKAI BOUNDS FOR TIME DELAY ESTIMATION WITH FREQUENCY HOPPING AND MULTICARRIER SIGNALS IN WIDEBAND RANDOM CHANNELS
    Sadler, Brian M.
    Liu, Ning
    Xu, Zhengyuan
    2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2010, : 2570 - 2573