Adaptation in Collaborative Governance Regimes

被引:113
|
作者
Emerson, Kirk [1 ]
Gerlak, Andrea K. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Sch Govt & Publ Policy, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Int Studies Assoc, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Udall Ctr Studies Publ Policy, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Adaptation; Adaptive capacity; Collaborative governance; Collaborative capacity; Institutional adaptation; SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; RIVER-BASIN MANAGEMENT; ADAPTIVE COMANAGEMENT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; RESILIENCE; FRAMEWORK; CAPACITY; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-014-0334-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Adaptation and the adaptive capacity of human and environmental systems have been of central concern to natural and social science scholars, many of whom characterize and promote the need for collaborative cross-boundary systems that are seen as flexible and adaptive by definition. Researchers who study collaborative governance systems in the public administration, planning and policy literature have paid less attention to adaptive capacity specifically and institutional adaptation in general. This paper bridges the two literatures and finds four common dimensions of capacity, including structural arrangements, leadership, knowledge and learning, and resources. In this paper, we focus on institutional adaptation in the context of collaborative governance regimes and try to clarify and distinguish collaborative capacity from adaptive capacity and their contributions to adaptive action. We posit further that collaborative capacities generate associated adaptive capacities thereby enabling institutional adaptation within collaborative governance regimes. We develop these distinctions and linkages between collaborative and adaptive capacities with the help of an illustrative case study in watershed management within the National Estuary Program.
引用
收藏
页码:768 / 781
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Collaborative Governance 2.0
    Rasche, Andreas
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2010, 10 (04): : 500 - +
  • [22] Paradoxes in collaborative governance
    Qi, Huiting
    Ran, Bing
    [J]. PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2024, 26 (10) : 2728 - 2753
  • [23] COPENHAGEN AND THE GOVERNANCE OF ADAPTATION
    Liverman, Diana
    Billett, Simon
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 52 (03): : 28 - 36
  • [24] Adaptation to natural flow regimes
    Lytle, DA
    Poff, NL
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2004, 19 (02) : 94 - 100
  • [25] Scales, regimes, and the urban governance of Glasgow
    Tretter, Eliot M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF URBAN AFFAIRS, 2008, 30 (01) : 87 - 102
  • [26] Beyond Subsystems: Policy Regimes and Governance
    Jochim, Ashley E.
    May, Peter J.
    [J]. POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2010, 38 (02) : 303 - 327
  • [27] Water governance regimes: Dimensions and dynamics
    Bressers, Hans
    Kuks, Stefan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WATER GOVERNANCE, 2013, 1 (1-2): : 133 - 156
  • [28] Decentralization of Natural Resource Governance Regimes
    Larson, Anne M.
    Soto, Fernanda
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2008, 33 : 213 - 239
  • [29] Shifting patterns of governance in authoritarian regimes
    O'Brien, Thomas
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 52 (02) : 303 - 316
  • [30] Sources of governance stability in communist regimes
    Kabele, Jiri
    [J]. POLISH SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2008, (162) : 203 - 221