Collective Intelligence in Project Groups: Reflections from the Field

被引:8
|
作者
Hansen, Morten Juel [1 ]
Vaagen, Hajnalka [2 ]
机构
[1] BI Norwegian Business Sch, Nydalen 37, N-0484 Oslo, Norway
[2] Molde Univ Coll, Britvegen 2, N-6410 Molde, Norway
关键词
Project management; dynamic complexity; collective intelligence; judgement; decision-making; problem solving; COGNITIVE UNDERPINNINGS; TEAM PERFORMANCE; DECISION-MAKING; SYSTEMS; COMPLEX; MODEL; TRAP;
D O I
10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.233
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Project performance is contingent upon the continuous ability of key decision-makers to collaborate effectively when solving emerging complex problems. In settings of large and complex projects, the ability to make sound decisions collectively across multiple tasks and phases increases in importance. Experimental studies have pointed to the existence of collective intelligence, i.e. the ability of groups to perform well across a variety of tasks. Nevertheless, we are not close to a process theory that clarifies why and how some groups are more 'intelligent' than are others, i.e. why and how they are better at solving a variety of complex problems. In order to answer these questions, we conduct an exploratory study of the drivers and manifestations of collective intelligence among a group of key decision makers in a large and dynamically complex project. The study reveals how these decision makers in general demonstrate a collective ability to solve a wide range of emerging problems in this project. This problem solving ability is characterized by very short and direct (face to face) lines of communication, the combination of divergent and convergent modes of thought, and small subgroups that are formed spontaneously dependent on the problem at hand and the expertise required to solve it. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:840 / 847
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] From intelligent machine to collective intelligence
    Logel, Jean-Luc
    [J]. Glass International, 2021, 44 (05): : 55 - 56
  • [22] Reflections from doctor groups
    Nakken, Karl Otto
    [J]. TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LAEGEFORENING, 2016, 136 (23-24) : 2030 - 2031
  • [23] AN APPROACH TO PROJECT MANAGEMENT EDUCATIONAL THROUGH COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE INTERNET TOOLS
    Meza, Jaime
    Monguet, Josep Ma
    Ortiz, Oswaldo
    Grimon, Francisca
    Trejo, Alex
    [J]. EDULEARN15: 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2015, : 1738 - 1745
  • [24] Taking Ethnography to Court: Pedagogical Reflections on a Collective Field Study
    Seim, Josh
    Adams, Jamie
    Huang, Jiayu
    Ortiz, Gabi Celia
    de Paula, Tiago Franco
    Yang, Jier
    [J]. TEACHING SOCIOLOGY, 2024,
  • [25] Mimicking the collective intelligence of human groups as an optimization tool for complex problems
    De Vincenzo, Ilario
    Massari, Giovanni F.
    Giannoccaro, Ilaria
    Carbone, Giuseppe
    Grigolini, Paolo
    [J]. CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2018, 110 : 259 - 266
  • [26] The magic of collective emotional intelligence in learning groups: No guys needed for the spell!
    Curseu, Petru L.
    Pluut, Helen
    Boros, Smaranda
    Meslec, Nicoleta
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 106 (02) : 217 - 234
  • [27] Smart groups of smart people: Evidence for IQ as the origin of collective intelligence in the performance of human groups
    Bates, Timothy C.
    Gupta, Shivani
    [J]. INTELLIGENCE, 2017, 60 : 46 - 56
  • [28] Reflections From the Field
    Biga, Cathleen
    Aranda, Juan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 84 (11) : 1038 - 1040
  • [29] Reflections from the Field
    Pal, Jeremy S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF RELIGION, 2015, 83 (02) : 432 - 436
  • [30] Collective Intelligence Model: How to Describe Collective Intelligence
    Georgi, Sandro
    Jung, Reinhard
    [J]. ADVANCES IN COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE 2011, 2012, 113 : 53 - 64