Exploring the connection between transdisciplinary co-production and urban sustainability solutions: a case study at an urban stream management symposium

被引:6
|
作者
Bixler, R. Patrick [1 ]
Belaire, J. Amy [2 ]
Faust, Kasey M. [3 ]
Scoggins, Mateo [4 ]
Gonzalez, Ana [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, LBJ Sch Publ Affairs, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Nature Conservancy, Austin, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Cockrell Sch Engn, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[4] Watershed Protect Dept, Austin, TX USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Urban sustainability; Co-production; Transdisciplinary research; Community engagement; SCIENCE; TEAMWORK; POLICY;
D O I
10.1007/s11252-022-01226-7
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Urban sustainability challenges are complex, impacting a wide range of stakeholders. It is commonly accepted that sustainable solutions must integrate scientific knowledge from a variety of disciplines, coupled with community stakeholder ideas, norms, and practices in ways that link knowledge to decision-making and action. Jointly researching problems and co-designing solutions, known as co-production, requires working together in teams. Interestingly, the intersection of co-production and team science has been understudied. We address this gap by asking: Does team formation - specifically, single-, multi- or trans-disciplinary teams - impact the process and perceived efficacy of sustainability solutions? Using case study data collected at the 5th Symposium for Urbanization and Stream Ecology (SUSE5), held in February 2020, we explore the impact of bringing different types of teams together to generate solutions to real-world "wicked problems" surrounding urban streams in Austin, Texas. We found that the solutions generated by trans-disciplinary teams - i.e., teams that include multiple disciplines and community members - were on average rated higher by their peers than solutions from single- or multi-disciplinary teams. However, our findings suggest that some transdisciplinary teams found it difficult to get through the different stages of problem definition to solution design. The findings from this limited but novel and unique case study make two important contributions to the literature. First, co-production leads to more agreeable solutions to urban sustainability challenges. Second, co-production team dynamics are likely to be more complicated and variable than disciplinary or multidisciplinary teams. A better understanding of these opportunities and challenges can inform institutions and agencies employing a community-engaged process to solve urban sustainability challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:1207 / 1216
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring the connection between transdisciplinary co-production and urban sustainability solutions: a case study at an urban stream management symposium
    R. Patrick Bixler
    J. Amy Belaire
    Kasey M. Faust
    Mateo Scoggins
    Ana González
    [J]. Urban Ecosystems, 2022, 25 : 1207 - 1216
  • [2] Urban research for sustainability: developing a comparative transdisciplinary co-production approach to realise just cities
    Palmer H.
    Simon D.
    Riise J.
    [J]. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 2022, 25 (1-2) : 78 - 94
  • [3] Organising for Co-Production: Local Interaction Platforms for Urban Sustainability
    Perry, Beth
    Patel, Zarina
    Bretzer, Ylva Noren
    Polk, Merritt
    [J]. POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE, 2018, 6 (01): : 189 - 198
  • [4] How Cities Think: Knowledge Co-Production for Urban Sustainability and Resilience
    Munoz-Erickson, Tischa A.
    Miller, Clark A.
    Miller, Thaddeus R.
    [J]. FORESTS, 2017, 8 (06):
  • [5] Comparative Urban Research From Theory To Practice: Co-Production For Sustainability
    Teo, Shaun S. K.
    [J]. SINGAPORE JOURNAL OF TROPICAL GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 41 (03) : 472 - 474
  • [6] Co-production of a transdisciplinary assessment by researchers and healthcare professionals: a case study
    Martin, Aleysha K.
    Green, Theresa L.
    McCarthy, Alexandra L.
    Sowa, P. Marcin
    Laakso, E-Liisa
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2022, 32 (02):
  • [7] Planning with urban informality: a case for inclusion, co-production and reiteration
    Song, Lily K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING REVIEW, 2016, 38 (04) : 359 - 381
  • [8] Co-Production Boundaries of Nature-Based Solutions for Urban Regeneration: The Case of a Healthy Corridor
    Caitana, Beatriz
    Moniz, Goncalo Canto
    [J]. URBAN PLANNING, 2024, 9
  • [9] Municipal strategies, fiscal incentives and co-production in urban waste management
    Fiorillo, Fabio
    Merkaj, Elvina
    [J]. SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 2024, 92
  • [10] THE BENEFITS AND RISKS OF EXPERIMENTAL CO-PRODUCTION: THE CASE OF URBAN REDESIGN IN VIENNA
    Bartenberger, Martin
    Szescilo, Dawid
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2016, 94 (02) : 509 - 525