Organising for Co-Production: Local Interaction Platforms for Urban Sustainability

被引:24
|
作者
Perry, Beth [1 ]
Patel, Zarina [2 ]
Bretzer, Ylva Noren [3 ]
Polk, Merritt [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Urban Inst & Urban Studies & Planning, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Cape Town, Dept Environm & Geog Sci, ZA-7700 Cape Town, South Africa
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Publ Adm, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Univ Gothenburg, Sch Global Studies, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
来源
POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE | 2018年 / 6卷 / 01期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
boundary spaces; co-production; collaborative governance; hybridization; local interaction platforms; Mistra Urban Futures; transdisciplinarity; urban experimentation; urban sustainability; POLITICS;
D O I
10.17645/pag.v6i1.1228
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Urban sustainability is a wicked issue unsuited to management through traditional decision-making structures. Co-productive arrangements, spaces and processes are inscribed in new organisational forms to bridge between diverse forms of knowledge and expertise. This article suggests that local interaction platforms (LIPs) are innovative responses to these challenges, developed in two African and two European cities between 2010 and 2014. Through elaborating the design and practice of the LIPs, the article concludes that the value of this approach lies in its context-sensitivity and iterative flexibility to articulate between internationally shared challenges and distinctive local practices. Six necessary conditions for the evolution of LIPs are presented: anchorage, co-constitution, context-sensitivity, alignment, connection and shared functions. In the context of increased uncertainty, complexity and the demand for transdisciplinary knowledge production, the platform concept has wider relevance in surfacing the challenges and possibilities for more adaptive urban governance.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 198
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Living labs and co-production: university campuses as platforms for sustainability science
    Evans, James
    Jones, Ross
    Karvonen, Andrew
    Millard, Lucy
    Wendler, Jana
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 16 : 1 - 6
  • [2] Digital Participatory Platforms for Co-Production in Urban Development: A Systematic Review
    Falco, Enzo
    Kleinhans, Reinout
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF E-PLANNING RESEARCH, 2018, 7 (03) : 52 - 79
  • [3] How Cities Think: Knowledge Co-Production for Urban Sustainability and Resilience
    Munoz-Erickson, Tischa A.
    Miller, Clark A.
    Miller, Thaddeus R.
    FORESTS, 2017, 8 (06):
  • [4] Comparative Urban Research From Theory To Practice: Co-Production For Sustainability
    Teo, Shaun S. K.
    SINGAPORE JOURNAL OF TROPICAL GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 41 (03) : 472 - 474
  • [5] Conditions for networked co-production through digital participatory platforms in urban planning
    Kleinhans, Reinout
    Falco, Enzo
    Babelon, Ian
    EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2022, 30 (04) : 769 - 788
  • [6] Six modes of co-production for sustainability
    Chambers, Josephine M.
    Wyborn, Carina
    Ryan, Melanie E.
    Reid, Robin S.
    Riechers, Maraja
    Serban, Anca
    Bennett, Nathan J.
    Cvitanovic, Christopher
    Fernandez-Gimenez, Maria E.
    Galvin, Kathleen A.
    Goldstein, Bruce E.
    Klenk, Nicole L.
    Tengo, Maria
    Brennan, Ruth
    Cockburn, Jessica J.
    Hill, Rosemary
    Munera, Claudia
    Nel, Jeanne L.
    Osterblom, Henrik
    Bednarek, Angela T.
    Bennett, Elena M.
    Brandeis, Amos
    Charli-Joseph, Lakshmi
    Chatterton, Paul
    Curran, K.
    Dumrongrojwatthana, Pongchai
    Duran, America Paz
    Fada, Salamatu J.
    Gerber, Jean-David
    Green, Jonathan M. H.
    Guerrero, Angela M.
    Haller, Tobias
    Horcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana
    Leimona, Beria
    Montana, Jasper
    Rondeau, Renee
    Spierenburg, Marja
    Steyaert, Patrick
    Zaehringer, Julie G.
    Gruby, Rebecca
    Hutton, Jon
    Pickering, Tomas
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 4 (11) : 983 - 996
  • [7] The sustainability of outcomes in temporary co-production
    Jaspers, Sylke
    Steen, Trui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2019, 33 (01) : 62 - 77
  • [8] Six modes of co-production for sustainability
    Josephine M. Chambers
    Carina Wyborn
    Melanie E. Ryan
    Robin S. Reid
    Maraja Riechers
    Anca Serban
    Nathan J. Bennett
    Christopher Cvitanovic
    María E. Fernández-Giménez
    Kathleen A. Galvin
    Bruce E. Goldstein
    Nicole L. Klenk
    Maria Tengö
    Ruth Brennan
    Jessica J. Cockburn
    Rosemary Hill
    Claudia Munera
    Jeanne L. Nel
    Henrik Österblom
    Angela T. Bednarek
    Elena M. Bennett
    Amos Brandeis
    Lakshmi Charli-Joseph
    Paul Chatterton
    K. Curran
    Pongchai Dumrongrojwatthana
    América Paz Durán
    Salamatu J. Fada
    Jean-David Gerber
    Jonathan M. H. Green
    Angela M. Guerrero
    Tobias Haller
    Andra-Ioana Horcea-Milcu
    Beria Leimona
    Jasper Montana
    Renee Rondeau
    Marja Spierenburg
    Patrick Steyaert
    Julie G. Zaehringer
    Rebecca Gruby
    Jon Hutton
    Tomas Pickering
    Nature Sustainability, 2021, 4 : 983 - 996
  • [9] Collective Action and the Sustainability of Co-Production
    Pestoff, Victor
    PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2014, 16 (03) : 383 - 401
  • [10] Local economics and co-production
    Boyle D.
    Development, 2010, 53 (3) : 319 - 324