Prospective life cycle assessment as a tool for environmentally responsible innovation

被引:5
|
作者
Yousefzadeh, Zeynab [1 ]
Lloyd, Shannon M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Gina Cody Sch Engn & Comp Sci, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Concordia Univ, John Molson Sch Business, Dept Management, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
emerging technologies; prospective life cycle assessment; responsible innovation; surface engineering; TECHNOLOGIES; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1109/ISTAS52410.2021.9629146
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Life cycle assessment (LCA), which provides a framework for assessing the potential environmental impact of technologies across their life cycle, has been identified as a potential tool for environmentally responsible innovation (RI). Traditional LCA approaches are insufficient for RI because they tend to be retrospective and underemphasize stakeholder engagement. Recent framing studies on LCA of emerging technology, which includes prospective LCA, suggest that uncertainty, data availability, methodological challenges, applicable evaluations techniques, and type of decisions supported are related to technology and market maturity. This study evaluates this framing based on two prospective LCAs of emerging technologies conducted by the authors. Uncertainty and methodological challenges were related to technology readiness. However, data availability was a challenge regardless of technology maturity, and was best addressed by engagement with technology developers and end-users. Furthermore, questions explored and evaluation techniques used were more diverse than those reported by the framing studies and were related to both analyst and stakeholder interests and technology and market maturity. While initial framing provides important guidance towards incorporating anticipation in prospective LCA, future interactions must not overlook the importance of engaging with stakeholders to guide model development and inform environmentally responsible development and innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Linear programming as a tool in life cycle assessment
    Azapagic A.
    Clift R.
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1998, 3 (6) : 305 - 316
  • [22] Life Cycle Assessment as a tool for environmental management
    J. R. Stewart
    M. W. Collins
    R. Anderson
    W. R. Murphy
    Clean Products and Processes, 1999, 1 (2): : 73 - 81
  • [23] Prospective Life Cycle Assessment of a Structural Battery
    Zackrisson, Mats
    Jonsson, Christina
    Johannisson, Wilhelm
    Fransson, Kristin
    Posner, Stefan
    Zenkert, Dan
    Lindbergh, Goran
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (20)
  • [24] Innovation in bridge life-cycle cost assessment
    Macek, Daniel
    Snizek, Vaclav
    CREATIVE CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE 2017, CCC 2017, 2017, 196 : 441 - 446
  • [25] Who Cares About Life Cycle Assessment? A Survey of 900 Prospective Life Cycle Assessment Practitioners
    Masanet, Eric
    Chang, Yuan
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2014, 18 (06) : 787 - 791
  • [26] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA) AS A TOOL FOR BUSINESS STRATEGY
    Salvador, Rodrigo
    Francisco, Antonio Carlos
    Piekarski, Cassiano Moro
    Luz, Leila Mendes
    INDEPENDENT JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & PRODUCTION, 2014, 5 (03): : 733 - 751
  • [27] A digital tool for life cycle assessment in construction projects
    Gay, Irene Campo
    Hvam, Lars
    Haug, Anders
    Huang, George Q.
    Larsson, Robert
    DEVELOPMENTS IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 20
  • [28] Life cycle assessment tool of electricity generation in Portugal
    Martins, Antonio A.
    Simaria, Marta
    Barbosa, Joaquim
    Barbosa, Ricardo
    Silva, Daniela T.
    Rocha, Cristina S.
    Mata, Teresa M.
    Caetano, Nidia S.
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 20 : 129 - 143
  • [29] Life-cycle assessment tool for railway infrastructure
    Castlo, D.
    Linneberg, P.
    Puddicombe, R.
    BRIDGE MAINTENANCE, SAFETY, MANAGEMENT AND LIFE EXTENSION, 2014, : 1064 - 1068
  • [30] Life cycle assessment is an evolving tool in sustainability field
    Anon
    2001, Thompson Publishing Group (10):