A randomized controlled trial of an online immunization curriculum

被引:13
|
作者
Pahud, Barbara [1 ]
Williams, S. Elizabeth [2 ]
Lee, Brian R. [1 ]
Lewis, Kadriye O. [1 ]
Middleton, Donald B. [3 ]
Clark, Shannon [1 ]
Humiston, Sharon G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Mercy Hosp, UMKC Sch Med, Dept Pediat, 2401 Gillham Rd, Kansas City, MO 64108 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Dept Pediat, Div Gen Pediat, 2200 Childrens Way,8232 Doctors Off Tower, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, 815 Freeport Rd, Pittsburgh, PA 15215 USA
关键词
Vaccine education; Medical education; Resident education; Vaccine hesitancy; Pediatric; Family medicine; UNITED-STATES RECOMMENDATIONS; AREA VACCINATION COVERAGE; AGED; 13-17; YEARS; COGNITIVE LOAD; HPV VACCINE; MULTIMEDIA; ATTITUDES; HESITANCY; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.09.043
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction: Immunization education for physicians-in-training is crucial to address vaccine concerns in clinical practice. Vaccine education is not standardized across residency programs. The Collaboration for Vaccination Education and Research (CoVER) team developed an online curriculum for pediatric (Peds) and family medicine (FM) residents. Methods: A cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) was performed during the 2017-2018 academic year to evaluate the CoVER curriculum. A convenience sample of residency institutions were randomly allocated to the intervention or control group, with stratification by residency type. The intervention, the CoVER curriculum, consisted of four online modules and an in-person training guide. Control sites continued with their standard vaccine education. Pre-intervention and post-intervention surveys were emailed to residents in both groups. The primary outcomes compared between groups were changes in "vaccine knowledge," "vaccine attitudes/hesitancy," and "self-confidence" in immunization communication. The team assessing outcomes was unblinded to assignments. Hierarchical general linear model was used to adjust for residency type and residency year; residency site was modeled as a random effect. Results: Overall, 1444 residents from 31 residency programs were eligible to participate (734 intervention, 710 control). The pre-intervention response rate was 730 (51%) and post-intervention was 526 (36%). Average knowledge scores increased from pre-intervention (control 53%; CoVER 53%) to post-intervention (control 58%; CoVER 60%). Increases in vaccine knowledge among FM residents were greater for CoVER compared to controls (p = 0.041). Vaccine hesitancy was more common among FM (23%) than Peds (10%) residents. In all three residency years, residents in the CoVER group showed greater increases in self-confidence in ability to discuss vaccines with parents/patients (p < 0.03) compared to control group. Conclusion: The CoVER curriculum is an effective model to standardize immunization education of physicians-in-training. This RCT demonstrated the effectiveness of the CoVER curriculum to improve resident confidence in their ability to discuss vaccines with parents and patients. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:7299 / 7307
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Randomized controlled trial to improve childhood immunization adherence in rural Pakistan: redesigned immunization card and maternal education
    Usman, Hussain R.
    Rahbar, Mohammad H.
    Kristensen, Sibylle
    Vermund, Sten H.
    Kirby, Russell S.
    Habib, Faiza
    Chamot, Eric
    TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2011, 16 (03) : 334 - 342
  • [32] Enhancement of critical thinking in curriculum design and delivery: A randomized controlled trial for educators
    Gul, Raisa
    Cassum, Shanaz
    Ahmad, Azra
    Khan, Shehla
    Saeed, Tanveer
    Parpio, Yasmin
    INNOVATION AND CREATIVITY IN EDUCATION, 2010, 2 (02): : 3219 - 3225
  • [33] The Sexunzipped Trial: Young People's Views of Participating in an Online Randomized Controlled Trial
    Nicholas, Angela
    Bailey, Julia V.
    Stevenson, Fiona
    Murray, Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (12)
  • [34] Helping doctors utilize the PSA effectively: an online randomized controlled trial (the DUPE trial)
    Farah, S. S.
    Winter, M. W.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 : 8 - 8
  • [35] Online video psychoeducation for electroconvulsive therapy in India: A randomized controlled trial
    Tsai, Jack
    Huang, Minda
    He, Hongbo
    Rosenheck, Robert A.
    ASIA-PACIFIC PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [36] Sustained effects of online genetics education: a randomized controlled trial on oncogenetics
    Elisa JF Houwink
    Sarah R van Teeffelen
    Arno MM Muijtjens
    Lidewij Henneman
    Florijn Jacobi
    Scheltus J van Luijk
    Geert Jan Dinant
    Cees van der Vleuten
    Martina C Cornel
    European Journal of Human Genetics, 2014, 22 : 310 - 316
  • [37] Effects of Online Cognitive Treatment for Problematic Anger: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Howie, Amanda J.
    Malouff, John M.
    COGNITIVE BEHAVIOUR THERAPY, 2014, 43 (04) : 310 - 318
  • [38] The RealU online cessation intervention for college smokers: A randomized controlled trial
    An, Lawrence C.
    Klatt, Colleen
    Perry, Cheryl L.
    Lein, Emily B.
    Hennrikus, Deborah J.
    Pallonen, Unto E.
    Bliss, Robin L.
    Lando, Harry A.
    Farley, Dana M.
    Ahluwalia, Jasjit S.
    Ehlinger, Edward P.
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 47 (02) : 194 - 199
  • [39] Cost-effectiveness of online positive psychology: Randomized controlled trial
    Bolier, Linda
    Majo, Cristina
    Smit, Filip
    Westerhof, Gerben J.
    Haverman, Merel
    Walburg, Jan A.
    Riper, Heleen
    Bohlmeijer, Ernst
    JOURNAL OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 9 (05): : 460 - 471
  • [40] Recruitment to Online Therapies for Depression: Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
    Jones, Ray B.
    Goldsmith, Lesley
    Hewson, Paul
    Williams, Christopher J.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (03) : 71 - 87