Antiplatelet therapy before or after 16 weeks' gestation for preventing preeclampsia: an individual participant data meta-analysis

被引:166
|
作者
Meher, Shireen [1 ,2 ]
Duley, Lelia [3 ]
Hunter, Kylie [4 ]
Askie, Lisa [4 ]
机构
[1] City Hosp, Div Women & Child Hlth, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham Clin Trials Unit, Nottingham, England
[4] Univ Sydney, Natl Hlth & Med Res Council Clin Trials Ctr, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
关键词
antiplatelets; aspirin; gestation; preeclampsia; prevention; LOW-DOSE ASPIRIN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PREGNANCY-INDUCED HYPERTENSION; FETAL GROWTH-RETARDATION; UTERINE ARTERY DOPPLER; HIGH-RISK; ACETYLSALICYLIC-ACID; WOMEN; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.016
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The optimum time for commencing antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of preeclampsia and its complications is unclear. Aggregate data meta-analyses suggest that aspirin is more effective if given prior to 16 weeks' gestation, but data are limited because of an inability to place women in the correct gestational age subgroup from relevant trials. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to use the large existing individual participant data set from the Perinatal Antiplatelet Review of International Studies Collaboration to assess whether the treatment effects of antiplatelet agents on preeclampsia and its complications vary based on whether treatment is started before or after 16 weeks' gestation. STUDY DESIGN: A meta-analysis of individual participant data including 32,217 women and 32,819 babies recruited to 31 randomized trials comparing low-dose aspirin or other antiplatelet agents with placebo or no treatment for the prevention of preeclampsia has been published previously. Using this existing data set, we performed a prespecified subgroup analysis based on gestation at randomization to antiplatelet agents before 16 weeks, compared with at or after 16 weeks, for 4 of the main outcomes prespecified in the Perinatal Antiplatelet Review of International Studies protocol: preeclampsia, death of baby, preterm birth before 34 weeks, and small-for-gestational-age baby. Individual participant data for the subgroups were combined in a meta-analysis using RevMan software. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I 2 statistic. The chi(2) test for interaction was used to assess statistically significant (P<.05) differences in treatment effect between subgroups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the effects of antiplatelet therapy for women randomized before 16 weeks' gestation compared with those randomized at or after 16 weeks for any of the 4 prespecified outcomes: preeclampsia, relative risk, 0.90, (95% confidence interval, 0.79e1.03; 17 trials, 9241 women) for <16 weeks and relative risk, 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.98; 22 trials, 21,429 women) for >= 16 weeks (interaction test, P=.98); death of baby, relative risk, 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.73-1.09; 15 trials, 8626 women) for <16 weeks and relative risk, 0.92 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.07; 21 trials, 22,336 women) for >= 16 weeks (interaction test, P=.80); preterm birth prior to 34 weeks, relative risk, 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.04; 19 trials, 9155 women) for <16 weeks and relative risk, 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.00; 25 trials, 22,117 women) for >= 16 weeks (interaction test, P=.91); and small-for-gestational-age baby, relative risk, 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.94; 13 trials, 6393 women) for<16 weeks and relative risk, 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.08; 18 trials, 14,996 women) for >= 16 weeks (interaction test, P=.08). CONCLUSION: The effect of low-dose aspirin and other antiplatelet agents on preeclampsia and its complications is consistent, regardless of whether treatment is started before or after 16 weeks' gestation. Women at an increased risk of preeclampsia should be offered antiplatelet therapy, regardless of whether they are first seen before or after 16 weeks' gestation.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 128
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Highlighting the Benefits and Disadvantages of Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis in Radiology
    Costa, Andre L. F.
    Lopes, Sergio L. P. C.
    RADIOLOGY-IMAGING CANCER, 2024, 6 (02):
  • [32] Quantifying heterogeneity in individual participant data meta-analysis with binary outcomes
    Bo Chen
    Andrea Benedetti
    Systematic Reviews, 6
  • [33] Meta-analysis of prognostic and predictive factors: Towards individual participant data?
    Faron, Matthieu
    Pignon, Jean-Pierre
    Paoletti, Xavier
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 104 : 224 - 226
  • [34] Callosotomy affects performance IQ: A meta-analysis of individual participant data
    Westerhausen, Rene
    Karud, Celine M. R.
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2018, 665 : 43 - 47
  • [35] Using individual participant data to improve network meta-analysis projects
    Riley, Richard D.
    Dias, Sofia
    Donegan, Sarah
    Tierney, Jayne F.
    Stewart, Lesley A.
    Efthimiou, Orestis
    Phillippo, David M.
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2023, 28 (03) : 197 - 203
  • [36] Combining individual participant and aggregated data in a meta-analysis with correlational studies
    Pigott, Terri
    Williams, Ryan
    Polanin, Joshua
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2012, 3 (04) : 257 - 268
  • [37] Commentary: Like it and lump it? Meta-analysis using individual participant data
    Riley, Richard D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 39 (05) : 1359 - 1361
  • [38] Depression, anxiety, and the risk of cancer: An individual participant data meta-analysis
    van Tuijl, Lonneke A.
    Basten, Maartje
    Pan, Kuan-Yu
    Vermeulen, Roel
    Portengen, Luetzen
    de Graeff, Alexander
    Dekker, Joost
    Geerlings, Mirjam I.
    Hoogendoorn, Adriaan
    Lamers, Femke
    Voogd, Adri C.
    Abell, Jessica
    Awadalla, Philip
    Beekman, Aartjan T. F.
    Bjerkeset, Ottar
    Boyd, Andy
    Cui, Yunsong
    Frank, Philipp
    Galenkamp, Henrike
    Garssen, Bert
    Hellingman, Sean
    Huisman, Martijn
    Huss, Anke
    de Jong, Trynke R.
    Keats, Melanie R.
    Kok, Almar A. L.
    Krokstad, Steinar
    van Leeuwen, Flora E.
    Luik, Annemarie I.
    Noisel, Nolwenn
    Onland-Moret, N. Charlotte
    Payette, Yves
    Penninx, Brenda W. J. H.
    Rissanen, Ina
    Roest, Annelieke M.
    Ruiter, Rikje
    Schoevers, Robert A.
    Soave, David
    Spaan, Mandy
    Steptoe, Andrew
    Stronks, Karien
    Sund, Erik R.
    Sweeney, Ellen
    Twait, Emma L.
    Teyhan, Alison
    Verschuren, W. M. Monique
    van der Willik, Kimberly D.
    Rosmalen, Judith G. M.
    Ranchor, Adelita V.
    CANCER, 2023, 129 (20) : 3287 - 3299
  • [39] Job insecurity and risk of diabetes: a meta-analysis of individual participant data
    Ferrie, Jane E.
    Virtanen, Marianna
    Jokela, Markus
    Madsen, Ida E. H.
    Heikkila, Katriina
    Alfredsson, Lars
    Batty, G. David
    Bjorner, Jakob B.
    Borritz, Marianne
    Burr, Hermann
    Dragano, Nico
    Elovainio, Marko
    Fransson, Eleonor I.
    Knutsson, Anders
    Koskenvuo, Markku
    Koskinen, Aki
    Kouvonen, Anne
    Kumari, Meena
    Nielsen, Martin L.
    Nordin, Maria
    Oksanen, Tuula
    Pahkin, Krista
    Pejtersen, Jan H.
    Pentti, Jaana
    Salo, Paula
    Shipley, Martin J.
    Suominen, Sakari B.
    Tabak, Adam
    Theorell, Toeres
    Vaananen, Ari
    Vahtera, Jussi
    Westerholm, Peter J. M.
    Westerlund, Hugo
    Rugulies, Reiner
    Nyberg, Solja T.
    Kivimaki, Mika
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2016, 188 (17-18) : E447 - E455
  • [40] Breastfeeding and handedness: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data
    Hujoel, Philippe P.
    LATERALITY, 2019, 24 (05): : 582 - 599