Comparison of different measurement methods for transmittance haze

被引:13
|
作者
Yu, Hsueh-Ling [1 ]
Hsaio, Chin-Chai [1 ]
机构
[1] Ind Technol Res Inst, Hsichu, Taiwan
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0026-1394/46/4/S19
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
Transmittance haze is increasingly important to the LCD and solar cell industry. Most commercial haze measurement instruments are designed according to the method recommended in the documentary standards like ASTM D 1003 (ASTM 2003 Standard Test Method for Haze and Luminous Transmittance of Transparent Plastics), JIS K 7361 (JIS 1997 Plastics-Determination of the Total Luminous Transmittance of Transparent Materials-Part I: Single Beam Instrument) and ISO 14782 (ISO 1997 Plastics-Determination of Haze of Transparent Materials). To improve the measurement accuracy of the current standards, a new apparatus was designed by the Center for Measurement Standards (Yu et al 2006 Meas. Sci. Technol. 17 N29-36). Besides the methods mentioned above, a double-beam method is used in the design of some instruments. There are discrepancies between the various methods. But no matter which method is used, a white standard is always needed. This paper compares the measurement results from different methods, presents the effect of the white standard, and analyses the measurement uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页码:S233 / S237
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] USE OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF FATIGUE CRACK CLOSURE MEASUREMENT AND THEIR COMPARISON
    Cerny, Ivo
    Remar, Lubos
    Cipera, Martin
    [J]. EXPERIMENTALNI ANALYZA NAPETI 2009/EXPERIMENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 74 - 81
  • [42] Body composition of undergraduates - comparison of four different measurement methods
    Brtkova, Mirianna
    Bakalar, Peter
    Matus, Ivan
    Hancova, Martina
    Rimarova, Kvetoslava
    [J]. PHYSICAL ACTIVITY REVIEW, 2014, 2 : 38 - 44
  • [43] Comparison of different monitoring methods for the measurement of metaldehyde in surface waters
    Glenn D. Castle
    Graham A. Mills
    Anthony Gravell
    Alister Leggatt
    Jeff Stubbs
    Richard Davis
    Gary R. Fones
    [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2019, 191
  • [44] Millimeter-wave Mixer Measurement: Comparison of different Methods
    Maestrojuan, I.
    Rea, S.
    Ederra, I.
    Gonzalo, R.
    [J]. 2013 38TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFRARED, MILLIMETER, AND TERAHERTZ WAVES (IRMMW-THZ), 2013,
  • [45] Efficiency Analysis and Comparison of Different Radon Progeny Measurement Methods
    Kadir, Abdumomin
    Zhang, Lei
    Guo, Qiuju
    Liang, Juncheng
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2013,
  • [46] COMPARISON OF 3 DIFFERENT METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF TISSUE PLATINUM LEVEL
    MINAMI, T
    ICHII, M
    OKAZAKI, Y
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL TRACE ELEMENT RESEARCH, 1995, 48 (01) : 37 - 44
  • [47] Comparison of Two Different Methods in Central Corneal Thickness Measurement
    Yaycioglu, Rana Altan
    Pelit, Aysel
    Toygar, Okan
    Akova, Yonca Aydin
    [J]. TURK OFTALMOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 36 (04): : 306 - 310
  • [48] FK506 MEASUREMENT - COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ANALYTICAL METHODS
    WARTY, V
    ZUCKERMAN, S
    VENKATARAMANAN, R
    LEVER, J
    FUNG, J
    STARZL, T
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 1993, 15 (03) : 204 - 208
  • [49] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ON-SITE MEASUREMENT METHODS AND THEIR PRACTICAL ACCURACY
    Benigni, Helmut
    Leithner, Stefan
    Jaberg, Helmut
    Guggenberger, Mark
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 2020 FLUIDS ENGINEERING DIVISION SUMMER MEETING (FEDSM2020), VOL 1, 2020,
  • [50] A comparison between thermographic and flow-meter methods for the evaluation of thermal transmittance of different wall constructions
    Nardi, I.
    Ambrosini, D.
    de Rubeis, T.
    Sfarra, S.
    Perilli, S.
    Pasqualoni, G.
    [J]. 33RD UIT (ITALIAN UNION OF THERMO-FLUID DYNAMICS) HEAT TRANSFER CONFERENCE, 2015, 655