A comparison of distal canal restrictors in primary cemented femoral hip arthroplasty

被引：0
|
作者：
Smith, EL
Wohlrab, KP
Matzkin, EG
Providence, BC
机构：
[1] Tripler Army Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, Honolulu, HI 96859 USA
[2] Univ Hawaii Manoa, John A Burns Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
来源：
ORTHOPEDICS | 2004年 / 27卷 / 08期
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学（修复外科学）];
学科分类号：
摘要：
A retrospective study evaluated 75 total hip arthroplasties performed over a 4-year period using 4 different cement restrictors. A harvested bone restrictor, polyethylene restrictor (Smith & Nephew, Richards Inc, Memphis, Tenn), Biostop G (Depuy Orthopaedics, Warsaw, Ind), and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) (Wright Medical Technology, Arlington, Tex) were compared for the percentage of failures, the average length of the cement mantle, and the width of the femoral canal compared to the cement grade. Patient age, sex, and cement type were also evaluated for their influence on cement grade. The PMMA restrictor and bone performed better than the Richards plug and Biostop G restrictor.
引用
收藏
页码：847 / 851
页数：5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty using the same femoral component
    Meding, John B.
    Ritter, Merrill A.
    Davis, Kenneth E.
    Hillery, Maggie
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 26 (01) : 62 - 66
  • [32] Revision total hip arthroplasty: the femoral side using cemented implants
    Graeme Holt
    Samantha Hook
    Matthew Hubble
    International Orthopaedics, 2011, 35 : 267 - 273
  • [33] Comparison of osteolysis around 3 different cement restrictors in total hip arthroplasty
    Prins, Wybren
    Cornelissen, Maarten P.
    Goudriaan, W. Alexander
    Edens, Mireille A.
    Amaya, Jeremy
    Zollinger, Paul E.
    Verheyen, Cees C. P. M.
    Ettema, Harmen B.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 34 (02) : 221 - 227
  • [34] TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY CEMENTED FEMORAL COMPONENT DISTAL STEM CENTRALIZER - EFFECT ON STEM CENTRALIZATION AND CEMENT MANTLE
    HANSON, PB
    WALKER, RH
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1995, 10 (05): : 683 - 688
  • [35] Radiographic comparison of cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing
    Leonard, M.
    Magill, P.
    Kiely, P.
    Khayyat, G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2007, 17 (06): : 583 - 586
  • [36] The varus cemented femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty: Predictors, implications and The Femoral Access Ratio
    Sheridan, G.
    Hughes, H.
    Welch-Phillips, A.
    Kenny, P.
    O'Toole, G.
    O'Byrne, J.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 23 : 8 - 12
  • [37] The influence of cemented femoral stem choice on the incidence of revision for periprosthetic fracture after primary total hip arthroplasty
    Palan, J.
    Smith, M. C.
    Gregg, P.
    Mellon, S.
    Kulkarni, A.
    Tucker, K.
    Blom, A. W.
    Murray, D. W.
    Pandit, H.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2016, 98B (10): : 1347 - 1354
  • [38] Lower reoperation rate for cemented femoral stem than for uncemented femoral stem in primary total hip arthroplasty following a displaced femoral neck fracture
    Andersen, Michelle F.
    Jakobsen, Thomas
    Bensen, Anne S.
    Krarup, Niels
    SICOT-J, 2015, 1
  • [39] Cemented Calcar Replacement Femoral Component in Revision Hybrid Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Ito, Hiroshi
    Tanino, Hiromasa
    Yamanaka, Yasuhiro
    Nakamura, Toshiki
    Minami, Akio
    Matsuno, Takeo
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2011, 26 (02): : 236 - 243
  • [40] Cemented Versus Cementless Femoral Fixation for Total Hip Arthroplasty Following Osteoarthritis
    Moore, Mallory C.
    Dubin, Jeremy A.
    Monarrez, Ruben
    Bains, Sandeep S.
    Hameed, Daniel
    Nace, James
    Mont, Michael A.
    Delanois, Ronald E.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2024, 39 (06): : 1545 - 1549
12345