Comparison of immersion ultrasound and low coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry in cataract patients

被引:7
|
作者
Li, Yan [1 ]
Li, Hong-Xun [1 ]
Liu, Yang-Chen [1 ]
Guo, Ya-Tu [1 ]
Gao, Jian-Min [1 ]
Wu, Bin [1 ]
Zhang, Nan [1 ]
Liu, Dong [1 ]
Yuan, Xiao-Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Med Univ, Clin Coll Ophthalmol, Tianjin Eye Hosp, Tianjin Key Lab Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, 4 Gansu Rd, Tianjin 300020, Peoples R China
关键词
ultrasonography; immersion; axial length; biometry; INTRAOCULAR-LENS CALCULATION; POWER CALCULATION; ACCURACY; FORMULA; INTERFEROMETRY; LENGTH;
D O I
10.18240/ijo.2018.06.11
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Aim: To compare the results of axial length (AL) biometry in cataract eyes by three methods: immersion B-ultrasound (IB) biometry, immersion A-ultrasound (IA) biometry and optical low coherence reflectometry. Methods: In this prospective observational study of eyes with cataract AL measurements were performed using immersion ultrasound and optical low coherence reflectometry device. The results were evaluated using Bland-Altman analyses. The differences between both methods were assessed using the paired t-test, and its correlation was evaluated by Pearson coefficient. Result s: Eighty eyes of 80 patients (39 men and 41 women) for cataract surgery were included in the study. The values of AL could be got from all 80 eyes by IB and IA, the difference of AL measurements between IA and IB was of no statistical significance (P=0.97); the mean difference in AL measurements was -0.031 mm (P=0.26; 95% CI, -0.09 to 0.02); linear regression showed an excellent correlation (r=0.98, P<0.0001). Forty-five of eighty eyes with results of AL measurements, which can be obtained by three methods; the difference of AL measurements was of no statistical significance (IA vs IB, P=0.18; IA vs Lenstar, P=0.51; IB vs Lenstar, P=0.07); linear regression showed an excellent correlation (IA vs IB, r=0.99; IA vs Lenstar, r=0.96; IB vs Lenstar, r=0.96); Bland-Altman analysis also showed good agreement between the two methods [IA vs IB, 95% limits of agreement (LoA), -0.36 to 0.28 mm; IA vs Lenstar, 95% LoA, -0.65 to 0.69 mm; IB vs Lenstar, 95% LoA, -0.55 to 0.68 mm]. Concl usion: Measurements with the optical low coherence reflectometry correlated well with IB and IA. In the eyes with serious refractive medium opacity, the measurements of AL could not be achieved or existed deviations when using optical low coherence reflectometry device. Under such circumstances, we should choose IA or IB as the optimization method to obtain measurements, in order to get much more accurate results.
引用
收藏
页码:966 / 969
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of immersion ultrasound and low coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry in cataract patients
    Yan Li
    Hong-Xun Li
    Yang-Chen Liu
    Ya-Tu Guo
    Jian-Min Gao
    Bin Wu
    Nan Zhang
    Dong Liu
    Xiao-Yong Yuan
    [J]. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2018, (06) : 966 - 969
  • [2] Comparison of Immersion Ultrasound, Partial Coherence Interferometry, and Low Coherence Reflectometry for Ocular Biometry in Cataract Patients
    Montes-Mico, Robert
    Carones, Francesco
    Buttacchio, Antonietta
    Ferrer-Blasco, Teresa
    Madrid-Costa, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 27 (09) : 664 - 670
  • [3] A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients
    Buckhurst, P. J.
    Wolffsohn, J. S.
    Shah, S.
    Naroo, S. A.
    Davies, L. N.
    Berrow, E. J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 93 (07) : 949 - 953
  • [4] Comparison of a new optical biometry with an optical low-coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry
    Guler, Emre
    Kulak, Ali Ender
    Totan, Yuksel
    Yuvarlak, Armagan
    Hepsen, Ibrahim Feyzi
    [J]. CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE, 2016, 39 (05): : 336 - 341
  • [5] Predictive Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation: Comparison of Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry and Immersion Ultrasound Biometry
    Turhan, Semra Akkaya
    Toker, Ebru
    [J]. EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2015, 41 (04): : 245 - 251
  • [6] Comparing optical low coherence reflectometry and immersion ultrasound in refractive outcome after cataract surgery
    Lam, Sheridan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 39 (02): : 297 - 298
  • [7] Comparison of optical low-coherence reflectometry and applanation ultrasound biometry on intraocular lens power calculation
    Mirjana Bjeloš Rončević
    Mladen Bušić
    Ivan Čima
    Biljana Kuzmanović Elabjer
    Damir Bosnar
    Daliborka Miletić
    [J]. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2011, 249 : 69 - 75
  • [8] Comparison of optical low-coherence reflectometry and applanation ultrasound biometry on intraocular lens power calculation
    Roncevic, Mirjana Bjelos
    Busic, Mladen
    Cima, Ivan
    Elabjer, Biljana Kuzmanovic
    Bosnar, Damir
    Miletic, Daliborka
    [J]. GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 249 (01) : 69 - 75
  • [9] Ocular biometry in dense cataracts: Comparison of partial-coherence interferometry, swept-source optical coherence tomography and immersion ultrasound
    Gonzalez-Godinez, Sara
    Saucedo-Urdapilleta, Roxana
    Mayorquin-Ruiz, Mariana
    Velasco-Barona, Cecilio
    Moragrega-Adame, Eduardo
    Dominguez-Varela, Irving A.
    Gonzalez-Salinas, Roberto
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 70 (01) : 107 - +
  • [10] Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using dual Scheimpflug analyzer and optical low-coherence reflectometry
    Han, Kyung Eun
    Lee, Hyo Kyung
    Shin, Minchul
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2015, 56 (07)