Trajectory Design of Perseus: A CubeSat Mission Concept to Phobos

被引:2
|
作者
Nallapu, Ravi teja [1 ]
Dektor, Graham [2 ]
Kenia, Nalik [2 ]
Uglietta, James [2 ]
Ichikawa, Shota [2 ]
Herreras-Martinez, Mercedes [2 ]
Choudhari, Akshay [2 ]
Chandra, Aman [1 ]
Schwartz, Stephen [3 ]
Asphaug, Erik [3 ]
Thangavelautham, Jekanthan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Aerosp & Mech Engn, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Sch Engn Matter, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Lunar & Planetary Lab, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
planetary moon exploration mission; interplanetary mission design; CubeSat systems engineering; co-orbital reconnaissance; hyperbolic reconnaissance; MARS; MOON; OPTIMIZATION; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.3390/aerospace7120179
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The Martian satellites Phobos and Deimos hold many unanswered questions that may provide clues to the origin of Mars. These moons are low Delta v stopover sites to Mars. Some human missions to Mars typically identify Phobos and Deimos as staging bases for Mars surface exploration. Astronauts could base initial operations there in lieu of repeated voyages to and from the planet surface, to refuel transiting spacecraft, to teleoperate robotics and other critical machinery, and to develop habitable infrastructure ahead of human landings. Despite their strategic and scientific significance, there has been no successful dedicated mission to either moon. For this reason, we propose Perseus, a geological imaging CubeSat mission to Phobos. Perseus, a 27U, 54kg CubeSat will return thermal and visible images at resolutions better than currently available over most of Phobos' surface. This includes visible images at 5m/pixel and thermal images at 25m/pixel of Phobos' surface. The Perseus mission is nominally intended to be a co-orbital mission, where the spacecraft will encounter Phobos on its Martian orbit. However, a hyperbolic rendezvous mission concept, to image Phobos on a hyperbolic flyby, is also considered to reduce the risks associated with orbit capture and to reduce mission costs. This paper presents the preliminary feasibility, science objectives, and technological development challenges of achieving these science goals. We then formulate two rendezvous concepts as a series of three nonlinear optimization problems that span the design tree of mission concepts. The tree's root node is the heliocentric cruise problem, which identifies the near-optimal launch and arrival windows for the Perseus spacecraft. The leaf nodes of the design tree are the two rendezvous concepts that identify near-optimal co-orbital and hyperbolic trajectories for Phobos' reconnaissance. The design problems are solved using evolutionary algorithms, and the performance of the selected mission concepts is then examined. The results indicate that a co-orbital encounter allows about one encounter per day with about 6 min per encounter. The hyperbolic encounter, on the other hand, allows a single encounter where the spacecraft will spend about 2 min in the imaging region with respect to Phobos. The spacecraft will obtain higher resolution images of Phobos on this feasible region than have ever been seen for most of the surface. These detailed images will help identify candidate landing sites and provide critical data to derisk future surface missions to Phobos.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 31
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE VISORS MISSION: A TWO SATELLITE CUBESAT FORMATION FLYING TELESCOPE
    Lightsey, E. Glenn
    Arunkumar, Ebenezer
    Kimmel, Elizabeth
    Kolhof, Maximilian
    Paletta, Antoine
    Rawson, William
    Selvamurugan, Shanmurugan
    Sample, John
    Guffanti, Tommaso
    Bell, Toby
    Koenig, Adam
    D'Amico, Simone
    Park, Hyeongjun
    Rabin, Douglas
    Daw, Adrian
    Chamberlin, Phil
    Kamalabadig, Farzad
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 44TH ANNUAL AMERICAN ASTRONAUTICAL SOCIETY GUIDANCE, NAVIGATION, AND CONTROL CONFERENCE, AAS 2022, 2024, : 1209 - 1233
  • [42] Trajectory Design for the ESA LISA Mission
    Martens, Waldemar
    Joffre, Eric
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASTRONAUTICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 68 (02): : 402 - 443
  • [43] NEAR mission overview and trajectory design
    Farquhar, RW
    Dunham, DW
    McAdams, JV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASTRONAUTICAL SCIENCES, 1995, 43 (04): : 353 - 371
  • [44] TRAJECTORY DESIGN OPERATIONS FOR THE IBEX MISSION
    Loucks, Mike
    Carrico, John
    Concha, Marco
    Craychee, Timothy
    [J]. SPACEFLIGHT MECHANICS 2009, VOL 134, PTS I-III, 2009, 134 : 509 - +
  • [45] Messenger mission overview and trajectory design
    McAdams, JV
    [J]. ASTRODYNAMICS 2003, PTS 1-3, 2003, 116 : 643 - 662
  • [46] Contour mission overview and trajectory design
    Farquhar, RW
    Dunham, DW
    Jen, SC
    [J]. SPACEFLIGHT MECHANICS 1997, PTS 1 AND 2, 1997, 95 : 921 - 934
  • [47] Trajectory Design for the ESA LISA Mission
    Waldemar Martens
    Eric Joffre
    [J]. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 2021, 68 : 402 - 443
  • [48] Europa Orbiter mission trajectory design
    Johannesen, JR
    D'Amario, LA
    [J]. ASTRODYNAMICS 1999, PTS 1-3, 2000, 103 : 895 - 908
  • [49] Trajectory design for cooperative combat mission
    Kashi, Amir Tavakoli
    [J]. 2008 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-9, 2008, : 3247 - 3253
  • [50] Genesis extended mission trajectory design
    Wilson, RS
    [J]. Spaceflight Mechanics 2005, Vol 120, Pts 1 and 2, 2005, 120 : 1949 - 1961