Preliminary Techno-Economic Assessment of Animal Cell-Based Meat

被引:21
|
作者
Risner, Derrick [1 ]
Li, Fangzhou [2 ,3 ]
Fell, Jason S. [3 ]
Pace, Sara A. [1 ]
Siegel, Justin B. [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Tagkopoulos, Ilias [2 ,3 ,8 ]
Spang, Edward S. [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Food Sci & Technol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Comp Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Genome Ctr, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Chem, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[5] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Biochem, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[6] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Mol Med, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[7] Univ Calif Davis, Innovat Inst Food & Hlth, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[8] Univ Calif Davis, USDA, AI Inst Next Generat Food Syst AIFS, Davis, CA 95616 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
cultured meat; cell-based meat; techno-economic assessment; bioreactor; process engineering; bioengineering; biomanufacturing; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY MEASURES; CULTURED MEAT; STEM-CELLS; ENERGY-METABOLISM; CHALLENGES; INDEXES; MODEL; DIFFERENTIATION; MYOGENESIS; EXPANSION;
D O I
10.3390/foods10010003
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Interest in animal cell-based meat (ACBM) or laboratory-grown meat has been increasing; however, the economic viability of these potential products has not been thoroughly vetted. Recent studies suggest monoclonal antibody production technology can be adapted for the industrialization of ACBM production. This study provides a scenario-based assessment of the projected cost per kilogram of ACBM produced in the United States based on cellular metabolic requirements and process/chemical engineering conventions. A sensitivity analysis of the model identified the nine most influential cost factors for ACBM production out of 67 initial parameters. The results indicate that technological performance will need to approach technical limits for ACBM to achieve profitably as a commodity. However, the model also suggests that low-volume high-value specialty products could be viable based on current technology.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Techno-economic assessment of a membrane-based wastewater reclamation process
    Perez, Gema
    Gomez, Pedro
    Ortiz, Inmaculada
    Urtiaga, Ane
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2022, 522
  • [32] Techno-Economic Challenges of Fuel Cell Commercialization
    Wang, Junye
    Wang, Hualin
    Fan, Yi
    [J]. ENGINEERING, 2018, 4 (03) : 352 - 360
  • [33] Techno-economic case for a remote WMAX cell
    Medeisis, A.
    [J]. ELEKTRONIKA IR ELEKTROTECHNIKA, 2008, (05) : 61 - 64
  • [34] A techno-economic assessment for replacement of conventional fossil fuel based technologies in animal farms with biogas fueled CHP units
    Hamzehkolaei, Fatemeh Teymoori
    Amjady, Nima
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 118 : 602 - 614
  • [35] A techno-economic assessment of offshore wind energy in Chile
    Mattar, Cristian
    Cristina Guzman-Ibarra, Maria
    [J]. ENERGY, 2017, 133 : 191 - 205
  • [36] Techno-Economic Assessment of Carbon Utilisation Potential in Europe
    Perez-Fortes, Mar
    Bocin-Dumitriu, Andrei
    Tzimas, Evangelos
    [J]. PRES 2014, 17TH CONFERENCE ON PROCESS INTEGRATION, MODELLING AND OPTIMISATION FOR ENERGY SAVING AND POLLUTION REDUCTION, PTS 1-3, 2014, 39 : 1453 - 1458
  • [37] Techno-economic assessment of desalination technology for application in agriculture
    Welle, Paul
    Azuara, Josue Medillin
    Viers, Joshua
    Mauter, Meagan
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 252
  • [38] A techno-economic assessment of wave energy resources in the Philippines
    Quitoras, Marvin Rhey D.
    Abundo, Michael Lochinvar S.
    Danao, Louis Angelo M.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 88 : 68 - 81
  • [39] Techno-economic databases in the context of integrated assessment modelling
    Ball, M
    Calaminus, B
    Kerdoncuff, P
    Rentz, O
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2005, 20 (09) : 1189 - 1193
  • [40] Techno-economic assessment of the separation of samarium, europium and gadolinium
    Ismail, Nurul Ain
    Abidin, Mohammad Alwi
    [J]. PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2021, 121