People's Experiences and Satisfaction With Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Australia: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

被引:136
|
作者
Isautier, Jennifer M. J. [1 ]
Copp, Tessa [1 ]
Ayre, Julie [1 ]
Cvejic, Erin [1 ]
Meyerowitz-Katz, Gideon [2 ,3 ]
Batcup, Carys [1 ]
Bonner, Carissa [1 ]
Dodd, Rachael [1 ]
Nickel, Brooke [1 ]
Pickles, Kristen [1 ]
Cornell, Samuel [1 ]
Dakin, Thomas [1 ]
McCaffery, Kirsten J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney Hlth Literacy Lab, Edward Ford Bldg,A27 Fisher Rd, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Sch Hlth & Soc, Populat Wellbeing & Environm Res Lab, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[3] Western Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Western Sydney Diabet, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
COVID-19; patient experience; telehealth; experience; satisfaction; telemedicine; Australia; usability; cross-sectional; survey; HEALTH-CARE UTILIZATION; TELEPHONE; LITERACY;
D O I
10.2196/24531
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth has rapidly been adopted to deliver health care services around the world. To date, studies have not compared people's experiences with telehealth services during the pandemic in Australia to their experiences with traditional in-person visits. Objective: This study aimed to compare participants' perceptions of telehealth consults to their perceptions of traditional in-person visits and investigate whether people believe that telehealth services would be useful after the pandemic. Methods: A national, cross-sectional, community survey was conducted between June 5 and June 12, 2020 in Australia. In total, 1369 participants who were aged >= 18 years and lived in Australia were recruited via targeted advertisements on social media (ie, Facebook and Instagram). Participants responded to survey questions about their telehealth experience, which included a free-text response option. A generalized linear model was used to estimate the adjusted relative risks of having a poorer telehealth experience than a traditional in-person visit experience. Content analysis was performed to determine the reasons why telehealth experiences were worse than traditional in-person visit experiences. Results: Of the 596 telehealth users, the majority of respondents (n=369, 61.9%) stated that their telehealth experience was "just as good as" or "better than" their traditional in-person medical appointment experience. On average, respondents perceived that telehealth would be moderately useful to very useful for medical appointments after the COVID-19 pandemic ends (mean 3.67, SD 1.1). Being male (P=.007), having a history of both depression and anxiety (P=.016), and lower patient activation scores (ie, individuals' willingness to take on the role of managing their health/health care) (P=.036) were significantly associated with a poor telehealth experience. In total, 6 overarching themes were identified from free-text responses for why participants' telehealth experiences were poorer than their traditional in-person medical appointment experiences, as follows: communication is not as effective, limitations with technology, issues with obtaining prescriptions and pathology results, reduced confidence in their doctor, additional burden for complex care, and inability to be physically examined. Conclusions: Based on our sample's responses, telehealth appointment experiences were comparable to traditional in-person medical appointment experiences. Telehealth may be worthwhile as a mode of health care delivery while the pandemic continues, and it may continue to be worthwhile after the pandemic.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Experiences of Psychotherapists With Remote Psychotherapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey Study
    Humer, Elke
    Stippl, Peter
    Pieh, Christoph
    Pryss, Ruediger
    Probst, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (11)
  • [32] Health Professional Frontline Leaders' Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Holge-Hazelton, Bibi
    Kjerholt, Mette
    Rosted, Elizabeth
    Hansen, Stine Thestrup
    Borre, Line Zacho
    McCormack, Brendan
    JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE LEADERSHIP, 2021, 13 : 7 - 18
  • [33] Older people's experience of the partial lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland: a cross-sectional study
    Maerki-Germann, Daphne
    Seematter-Bagnoud, Laurence
    Fustinoni, Sarah
    Spaltenstein, Julia
    Bula, Christophe
    Henchoz, Yves
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [34] Nurses’ duty to care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey
    Hyerine Shin
    Kyung hee Kim
    Ji-su Kim
    Yeun-hee Kwak
    BMC Nursing, 21
  • [35] Nurses' duty to care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey
    Shin, Hyerine
    Kim, Kyung Hee
    Kim, Ji-su
    Kwak, Yeun-hee
    BMC NURSING, 2022, 21 (01)
  • [36] A Cross-Sectional Study of Telemedicine Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic in People With Multiple Sclerosis
    Patel, A. M.
    Schuldt, R.
    Boudreau, D. M.
    Win, N.
    Cobb, B. R.
    McGinley, M.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2023, 29 : 65 - 66
  • [37] Resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic among people living with HIV: A cross-sectional study
    Killi, Nesrin Ecem
    Bakir, Cicek Nur
    Canbaz, Ata Alpay
    Karabulut, Kardelen
    Mutlu, Ali
    Karatasli, Seyhmus
    Tekin, Suda
    Kayi, Ilker
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2023, 34 (07) : 457 - 467
  • [38] Chinese Residents' Perceptions of COVID-19 During the Pandemic: Online Cross-sectional Survey Study
    Cui, Tingting
    Yang, Guoping
    Ji, Lili
    Zhu, Lin
    Zhen, Shiqi
    Shi, Naiyang
    Xu, Yan
    Jin, Hui
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (11)
  • [39] Participation in Virtual Urology Conferences During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Survey Study
    Wang, Menghua
    Liao, Banghua
    Jin, Xi
    Xiang, Liyuan
    Yuan, Chi
    Li, Hong
    Wang, Kunjie
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (04)
  • [40] Support needs of Australians bereaved during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey study
    Ivynian, Serra E.
    Maccallum, Fiona
    Chang, Sungwon
    Breen, Lauren J.
    Phillips, Jane L.
    Agar, Meera
    Hosie, Annmarie
    Tieman, Jennifer
    DiGiacomo, Michelle
    Luckett, Tim
    Philip, Jennifer
    Dadich, Ann
    Grossman, Christopher
    Gilmore, Imelda
    Harlum, Janeane
    Kinchin, Irina
    Glasgow, Nicholas
    Lobb, Elizabeth A.
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (06):