People's Experiences and Satisfaction With Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Australia: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

被引:136
|
作者
Isautier, Jennifer M. J. [1 ]
Copp, Tessa [1 ]
Ayre, Julie [1 ]
Cvejic, Erin [1 ]
Meyerowitz-Katz, Gideon [2 ,3 ]
Batcup, Carys [1 ]
Bonner, Carissa [1 ]
Dodd, Rachael [1 ]
Nickel, Brooke [1 ]
Pickles, Kristen [1 ]
Cornell, Samuel [1 ]
Dakin, Thomas [1 ]
McCaffery, Kirsten J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney Hlth Literacy Lab, Edward Ford Bldg,A27 Fisher Rd, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Sch Hlth & Soc, Populat Wellbeing & Environm Res Lab, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[3] Western Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Western Sydney Diabet, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
COVID-19; patient experience; telehealth; experience; satisfaction; telemedicine; Australia; usability; cross-sectional; survey; HEALTH-CARE UTILIZATION; TELEPHONE; LITERACY;
D O I
10.2196/24531
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth has rapidly been adopted to deliver health care services around the world. To date, studies have not compared people's experiences with telehealth services during the pandemic in Australia to their experiences with traditional in-person visits. Objective: This study aimed to compare participants' perceptions of telehealth consults to their perceptions of traditional in-person visits and investigate whether people believe that telehealth services would be useful after the pandemic. Methods: A national, cross-sectional, community survey was conducted between June 5 and June 12, 2020 in Australia. In total, 1369 participants who were aged >= 18 years and lived in Australia were recruited via targeted advertisements on social media (ie, Facebook and Instagram). Participants responded to survey questions about their telehealth experience, which included a free-text response option. A generalized linear model was used to estimate the adjusted relative risks of having a poorer telehealth experience than a traditional in-person visit experience. Content analysis was performed to determine the reasons why telehealth experiences were worse than traditional in-person visit experiences. Results: Of the 596 telehealth users, the majority of respondents (n=369, 61.9%) stated that their telehealth experience was "just as good as" or "better than" their traditional in-person medical appointment experience. On average, respondents perceived that telehealth would be moderately useful to very useful for medical appointments after the COVID-19 pandemic ends (mean 3.67, SD 1.1). Being male (P=.007), having a history of both depression and anxiety (P=.016), and lower patient activation scores (ie, individuals' willingness to take on the role of managing their health/health care) (P=.036) were significantly associated with a poor telehealth experience. In total, 6 overarching themes were identified from free-text responses for why participants' telehealth experiences were poorer than their traditional in-person medical appointment experiences, as follows: communication is not as effective, limitations with technology, issues with obtaining prescriptions and pathology results, reduced confidence in their doctor, additional burden for complex care, and inability to be physically examined. Conclusions: Based on our sample's responses, telehealth appointment experiences were comparable to traditional in-person medical appointment experiences. Telehealth may be worthwhile as a mode of health care delivery while the pandemic continues, and it may continue to be worthwhile after the pandemic.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Women's Satisfaction With Telehealth Services During The COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Survey Study
    Mittone, Diletta F.
    Bailey, Caitlin P.
    Eddy, Ebony L.
    Napolitano, Melissa A.
    Vyas, Amita
    JMIR PEDIATRICS AND PARENTING, 2022, 5 (04):
  • [2] Telehealth access among hematology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia: a cross-sectional survey
    Zomerdijk, Nienke
    Jongenelis, Michelle
    Turner, Jane
    Huntley, Kathryn
    Smith, Andrew
    Short, Camille E.
    LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 2022, 63 (06) : 1488 - 1491
  • [3] Experiences of attending prenatal ultrasounds during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia: A cross-sectional survey
    Nightingale, Helen J.
    Watts, Christina
    Pham, Kim
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2024,
  • [4] Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Registered Dietitian Nutritionists
    Rozga, Mary
    Handu, Deepa
    Kelley, Kathryn
    Jimenez, Elizabeth Yakes
    Martin, Hannah
    Steiber, Alison
    JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2021, 121 (12) : 2524 - 2535
  • [5] Experiences of resident dermatologists during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey
    Stewart, Claire R.
    Lipner, Shari R.
    DERMATOLOGIC THERAPY, 2021, 34 (01)
  • [6] Experiences and Satisfaction With Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Perspectives of Patients With Cancer in Australia
    Nanda, Arnav
    Lam, Lyn Ley
    Lynch, Jodi
    Soudy, Hussein
    JCO GLOBAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 10
  • [7] Telehealth in physiotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic, the perspective of the service users: A cross-sectional survey
    Reynolds, Aisling
    Sheehy, Neasa
    Awan, Nasir
    Gallagher, Paula
    PHYSIOTHERAPY PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 2022, 43 (02) : 241 - 248
  • [8] Experiences and Satisfaction With Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Perspectives of Patients With Cancer in Australia
    Nanda, Arnav
    Lam, Lyn Ley
    Lynch, Jodi
    Soudy, Hussein
    JCO GLOBAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 10
  • [9] Accessibility of Telehealth Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Medicare Beneficiaries
    Ng, Boon Peng
    Park, Chanhyun
    PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE, 2021, 18
  • [10] Patients' experience of telehealth clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional study
    Alradini, Faten A.
    Abdulrahim, Maha
    Alotaibi, Naif
    Al Amri, Fahad A.
    Amer, Samar Ahmed
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (38)