How many crashes are caused by driver interaction with passengers? A meta-analysis approach

被引:18
|
作者
Theofilatos, Athanasios [1 ]
Ziakopoulos, Apostolos [1 ]
Papadimitriou, Eleonora [1 ]
Yannis, George [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Dept Transportat Planning & Engn, 5 Heroon Polytech St, GR-15773 Athens, Greece
关键词
Interaction; Conversation; Passengers; Driver distraction; Meta-analysis; PHONE CONVERSATIONS; PUBLICATION BIAS; TEENAGE DRIVERS; DISTRACTION; REGRESSION; PROGRAMS; INCREASE; ENGLAND; INJURY; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsr.2018.02.001
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Conversation and other interactions with passengers while driving induce a level of distraction to the person driving. Method: This paper conducts a qualitative literature review on the effect of passenger interaction on road safety and then extends it by using meta-analysis techniques. Results: The literature review indicates that the distraction due to passengers is a very frequent risk factor, with detrimental effects to various driving behavior and safety measures (e.g., slower reaction times to events, increased severity of injuries in crashes), associated with non negligible proportions of crashes. Particular issues concern the effect of passenger age (children, teenagers) on which the literature is inconclusive. Existing studies vary considerably in terms of study methods and outcome measures. Nevertheless, a meta-analysis could be carried out regarding the proportion of crashes caused by this distraction factor. The selection of studies for the meta-analysis was based on a rigorous method including specific study selection criteria. The findings of the random-effects meta-analyses that were carried out showed that driver interaction with passengers causes a non-negligible proportion of road crashes, namely 3.55% of crashes regardless of the age of the passengers and 3.85% when child and teen passengers are excluded. Both meta-estimates were statistically significant, revealing the need for further research, especially considering the role of passenger age. Practical applications: Stakeholders could make good estimates on future crash numbers and causes and take action in order to counter the effects of passenger interaction. (C) 2018 National Safety Council and Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 20
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effects of drink-driving checkpoints on crashes-A meta-analysis
    Erke, Alena
    Goldenbeld, Charles
    Vaa, Truls
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2009, 41 (05): : 914 - 923
  • [22] Effects of Adverse Weather on Traffic Crashes Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Qiu, Lin
    Nixon, Wilfrid A.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2008, 2055 (2055) : 139 - 146
  • [23] The Verifiability Approach: A Meta-Analysis
    Palena, Nicola
    Caso, Letizia
    Vrij, Aldert
    Nahari, Galit
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2021, 10 (01) : 155 - 166
  • [24] A Bayesian approach to meta-analysis
    Mila, A.
    Ngugi, H.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2009, 99 (06) : S162 - S162
  • [25] Multiplicative interaction in network meta-analysis
    Piepho, Hans-Peter
    Madden, Laurence V.
    Williams, Emlyn R.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 34 (04) : 582 - 594
  • [26] How effective are warnings? A meta-analysis
    Hancock, P. A.
    Kaplan, A. D.
    MacArthur, K. R.
    Szalma, J. L.
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2020, 130
  • [27] How to interpret meta-analysis results
    Ribaldone, Davide G.
    Petrini, Elisa
    PANMINERVA MEDICA, 2017, 59 (03) : 274 - 274
  • [28] How to design a meta-analysis in biomarkers
    Billingham, Lucinda
    Riley, Richard D.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 4 (09) : S78 - S79
  • [29] How To Read a Network Meta-analysis
    Nino, Angie K. Puerto
    Brignardello-Petersen, Romina
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2023, 9 (05): : 701 - 704
  • [30] How to perform and write a meta-analysis
    Bramley, P.
    Wiles, M. D.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 77 (11) : 1299 - 1303