Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness after prior cesarean section to predict uterine rupture: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:38
|
作者
Swift, Brenna E. [1 ,2 ]
Shah, Prakesh S. [3 ,4 ]
Farine, Dan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Neonatol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Pediat, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
labor; lower uterine segment thickness; trial of labor after cesarean section; ultrasound; uterine rupture; ULTRASONOGRAPHIC EVALUATION; SCAR DEHISCENCE; VAGINAL BIRTH; WOMEN; RISK; TERM; INTEGRITY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.13585
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction Cesarean section rates are increasing with a decrease in the rate of trial of labor after cesarean section. The objective of this study was to systematically review the predictive characteristics of sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness for uterine rupture during labor. Material and methods The review was carried out in agreement with PRISMA and SEDATE guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Library were searched from 1990 until November 2018. Quality of included studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Data were extracted to construct 2 x 2 tables from each study comparing ultrasound measurement with uterine defect at time of delivery. The data were plotted as a summary receiver-operating characteristic (SROC) curve using the hierarchical SROC model. Results Twenty-eight observational cohort studies met the selection criteria for inclusion. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness was measured at a gestational age of 36-40 weeks in women with a previous cesarean section. The risk of bias and concerns regarding applicability were low among most studies. The sonographic measurement was correlated with either delivery outcome or lower uterine segment thickness at the time of repeat cesarean section. The cut-off value for lower uterine segment thickness ranged from 1.5 to 4.05 mm across all studies. An association between thin lower uterine segment measurement and uterine dehiscence and uterine rupture was shown in 27 and four studies, respectively. Nineteen studies were included in a meta-analysis with a subgroup analysis by ultrasound methodology. In the subgroup using the ultrasound methodology associated with uterine rupture, the cut-off value is more precise (2.0-3.65 mm) among these 12 studies. There were 18 cases (1.0%) of uterine rupture, 120 (6.6%) of uterine dehiscence and 1674 (92.4%) women with no uterine defect. The SROC curve showed a sensitivity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.92) and specificity of 0.77 (95% CI 0.70-0.83). The negative likelihood ratio was 0.11 (95% CI 0.08-0.16) and the diagnostic odds ratio was 34.0 (95% CI 18.2-63.5). Conclusions Lower uterine segment thickness >3.65 mm, measured using a standardized ultrasound technique, is associated with a lower likelihood of uterine rupture.
引用
收藏
页码:830 / 841
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment thickness in patients of previous cesarean section
    Sen, S
    Malik, S
    Salhan, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2004, 87 (03) : 215 - 219
  • [22] The risk of uterine rupture after myomectomy: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
    Claeys, J.
    Hellendoorn, I.
    Hamerlynck, T.
    Bosteels, J.
    Weyers, S.
    GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY, 2014, 11 (03) : 197 - 206
  • [23] Sonography of Lower Uterine Segment Thickness and Prediction of Uterine Rupture Reply
    Bergeron, Marie-Eve
    Jastrow, Nicole
    Brassard, Normand
    Girard, Mario
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 113 (06): : 1371 - 1372
  • [24] Can third-trimester assessment of uterine scar in women with prior Cesarean section predict uterine rupture?
    Gonser, M.
    Schmeil, I.
    Klee, A.
    Zumdick, C.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 48 (04) : 537 - U143
  • [25] Can third-trimester assessment of uterine scar in women with prior Cesarean section predict uterine rupture?
    Jastrow, N.
    Vikhareva, O.
    Gauthier, R. J.
    Irion, O.
    Boulvain, M.
    Bujold, E.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 47 (04) : 410 - 414
  • [26] Intrapartum posterior uterine wall rupture in lower segment cesarean section scarred uterus
    Singhal, SR
    Agarwal, U
    Sangwan, K
    Khosla, A
    Singhal, S
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2005, 84 (02) : 196 - 197
  • [27] RUPTURE OF THE TRANSVERSE UTERINE SCAR AFTER LOWER SEGMENT CAESAREAN SECTION
    LAWRENCE, RF
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE, 1949, 56 (06): : 1024 - 1027
  • [28] Does Lower Uterine Segment Thickness Measurement Improve Birth Planning After Previous Cesarean Section?
    Schmitz, Jessica
    Stepan, Holger
    Schrey-Petersen, Susanne
    Hoffmann, Janine
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GEBURTSHILFE UND NEONATOLOGIE, 2019, 223 (06): : 350 - 358
  • [29] Sonographic Assessment of the Lower Uterine Segment (LUS) Thickness and Integrity in Patients with Previous Cesarean Delivery
    Mutlaq, Jamal Mohammad
    Hamad, Hesham Mohamad
    BAHRAIN MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2021, 43 (01) : 357 - 360
  • [30] Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment thickness in pregnant women with previous cesarean section
    Mohammed, Abdel Baset F.
    Al-Moghazi, Diaa A.
    Hamdy, Mamdouh T.
    Mohammed, Enas M.
    MIDDLE EAST FERTILITY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2010, 15 (03) : 188 - 193