Refill non-adherence to repeat prescriptions leads to treatment gaps or to high extra costs

被引:15
|
作者
Krigsman, Kristin [1 ]
Melander, Arne
Carlsten, Anders
Ekedahl, Anders
Nilsson, J. Lars G.
机构
[1] NEPI Fdn, S-11881 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Community Med, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[3] Apoteket AB, Natl Corp Swedish Pharmacies, S-41327 Gothenburg, Sweden
来源
PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE | 2007年 / 29卷 / 01期
关键词
costs; exemption from charges; oversupply; refill adherence; repeat prescriptions; treatment gaps; undersupply; ADHERENCE; MEDICINES; PATIENT; THERAPY; CHARGES;
D O I
10.1007/s11096-005-4797-8
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the nature and extent of undersupply and the economic consequences of oversupply of medication among non-adherent patients. Methods: This study used copies of repeat prescriptions (=multiple dispensations), collected during 1 week in 2002 at 16 Swedish community pharmacies. For patients with a refill adherence below 80%, treatment gaps were defined as the number of days they had no drug available. The cost of drug oversupply (i.e., refill adherence > 120%) was calculated from the prices of the drug packages dispensed. Results: The number of collected repeat prescriptions was 3,636. The median of treatment gaps among patients with a refill adherence below 80% was 53 days per 90-100 days treatment period and the corresponding median for oversupply was 40 days. The cost of oversupply for exempt patients (i.e., patients who have paid 1,800 SEK (196 euro; US$ 243) per year for medicines) was 32,000 SEK (3,500 euro; US$ 4,300) higher than for non-exempt patients. An extrapolation to all Sweden indicates that exemption from charges leads to an additional oversupply of about 142 million SEK (15 million euro; US$ 19 million) per year above that of non-exempt patients. Conclusion: Both undersupply and oversupply of prescribed medicines are common in Sweden. Patients with a refill adherence below 80% seem to have less than half of the prescribed treatment available. Oversupply or drug stockpiling occurs more frequently among exempt than among non-exempt patients, and this oversupply leads to high unnecessary costs.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 24
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Non-adherence to Standards of Care in the Treatment of Cancer Patients
    Tchelebi, L.
    Shen, B.
    Wang, M.
    Park, H. S. M.
    Zaorsky, N. G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E406 - E407
  • [43] TB treatment non-adherence in Sao Tome and Principe
    Bandeira, S.
    da Trindade, S.
    Raguenaud, M. E.
    Sousa, B.
    PUBLIC HEALTH ACTION, 2022, 12 (04): : 195 - 200
  • [44] A practical approach to assessment of non-adherence to antihypertensive treatment
    Kocianova, Eva
    Taborsky, Milos
    Vaclavik, Jan
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2023, 41 (09) : 1371 - 1375
  • [45] Evaluation of non-adherence to hipoglucemiary treatment in community pharmacy
    Leites-Docio, Andrea
    Garcia-Rodriguez, Patricia
    Fernandez-Cordeiro, Marta
    Tenorio-Salgueiro, Lorena
    Fornos-Perez, Jose A.
    Floro Andres-Rodriguez, N.
    FARMACEUTICOS COMUNITARIOS, 2019, 11 (01): : 5 - 13
  • [46] Treatment non-adherence in pseudo-refractory epilepsy
    Brodtkorb, Eylert
    Samsonsen, Christian
    Sund, Janne Kutschera
    Brathen, Geir
    Helde, Grethe
    Reimers, Arne
    EPILEPSY RESEARCH, 2016, 122 : 1 - 6
  • [47] Non-adherence to tuberculosis treatment in the eastern Tarai of Nepal
    Wares, DF
    Singh, S
    Acharya, AK
    Dangi, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE, 2003, 7 (04) : 327 - 335
  • [48] IS A HIGH FeNO A MARKER OF NON-ADHERENCE IN DIFFICULT ASTHMA?
    McNicholl, D. M.
    McGarvey, L. P.
    Heaney, L. G.
    THORAX, 2011, 66 : A8 - A8
  • [49] Systematic review: non-adherence and non-persistence in intravitreal treatment
    Ehlken, Christoph
    Ziemssen, Focke
    Eter, Nicole
    Lanzl, Ines
    Kaymak, Hakan
    Lommatzsch, Albrecht
    Schuster, Alexander K.
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 258 (10) : 2077 - 2090