A preliminary assessment of MCNP unstructured mesh integration in the ITER neutronics model

被引:2
|
作者
De Pietri, Marco [1 ]
Fabbri, Marco [1 ]
Laghi, Davide [1 ]
Pampin, Raul [1 ]
机构
[1] Fus Energy, JosepPla 2, Barcelona 08019, Spain
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
ITER; MCNP; Unstructured mesh; Vacuum vessel; High resolution 3D nuclear heat deposition;
D O I
10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.01.058
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The design of nuclear fusion devices like ITER requires the execution of complex multi-physics simulations, involving different analysis disciplines such as mechanical, thermal-hydraulic and neutronics. Nowadays, thanks to the novel implementation of unstructured mesh capability into MCNP6, nuclear responses can be computed over volumetric meshes conformal with the components tackling the problematic load transference between different codes and, at the same time, improving the modelling methodology. Initially a sensitivity analysis over type, order and number of elements was performed to evaluate the hybrid geometry performances in terms of memory demands, time of loading and the different MCNP implementation methodologies. Subsequently, a limited region of the ITER vacuum vessel was modeled with unstructured meshes by means of the HyperMesh code. This region was chosen as one of the examples where the explicit structured mesh tally scoring can produce unphysical results near the cells boundaries where the mesh tally voxels cross two (or more) cells with different material properties and relative cross sections. Results are compared with the standard Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG) ITER model and discussed. Samples of the unstructured mesh tallies were taken and locally assessed against the structured tallies. The particle fluxes and nuclear heating maps obtained show an overall agreement on the average resulting values, however significant local deviations were observed. In particular, unstructured mesh local results showed higher degree of correlation to the underlying materials and avoided the presence of unphysical peaks. However, the added complexity and the time required for meshing large regions, which include many complicated parts, makes an analysis of the benefits necessary, and it limits the application of hybrid geometries to particular cases.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 700
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An unstructured mesh based neutronics optimization workflow*
    Zavorka, Lukas
    Ghoos, Kristel
    Risner, Joel
    Remec, Igor
    [J]. NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2023, 1052
  • [2] Application of MCNP unstructured mesh in the design process of the ITER EC-UL M3 mirror
    Chohan, Haridev
    Fabbri, Marco
    Pampin, Raul
    Portone, Alfredo
    D'Amico, Gabriele
    Cubi, Alvaro
    [J]. FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2021, 166
  • [3] A Monte-Carlo Benchmark of TRIPOLI-4® and MCNP on ITER neutronics
    Blanchet, David
    Peneliau, Yannick
    Eschbach, Romain
    Fontaine, Bruno
    Cantone, Bruno
    Ferlet, Marc
    Gauthier, Eric
    Guillon, Christophe
    Letellier, Laurent
    Proust, Maxime
    Mota, Fernando
    Palermo, Iole
    Rios, Luis
    Le Guern, Frederic
    Kocan, Martin
    Reichle, Roger
    [J]. ICRS-13 & RPSD-2016, 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RADIATION SHIELDING & 19TH TOPICAL MEETING OF THE RADIATION PROTECTION AND SHIELDING DIVISION OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY - 2016, 2017, 153
  • [4] MCNP model of the ITER Tokamak Complex
    Lopez-Revelles, A. J.
    Catalan, J. P.
    Kolsek, A.
    Juarez, R.
    Garcia, R.
    Garcia, M.
    Sanz, J.
    [J]. FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2018, 136 : 859 - 863
  • [5] Neutronics analysis of the international thermonuclear experimental reactor (ITER) MCNP "Benchmark CAD Model" with the ATTILA discrete ordinance code
    Youssef, Mahmoud Z.
    Feder, Russell
    Davis, Ian M.
    [J]. FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2008, 83 (10-12) : 1661 - 1668
  • [6] MCNP6 UNSTRUCTURED MESH INITIAL VALIDATION AND PERFORMANCE RESULTS
    Martz, Roger L.
    [J]. NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 180 (03) : 316 - 335
  • [7] Neutronics analysis for ITER UP18 preliminary design
    An, YoungHwa
    Cheon, MunSeong
    Pak, Sunil
    Kim, Jaemin
    Seon, Changrae
    Choi, Jihyun
    Lee, H. G.
    [J]. FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2019, 141 : 101 - 108
  • [8] PRELIMINARY STUDY ON APPLYING DISCRETE ORDINATES CODE SUPPORTING UNSTRUCTURED TETRAHEDRAL MESH TO THE 40-DEGREE TOROIDAL SEGMENT ITER MODEL
    Kim, Jong Woon
    Lee, Cheol Woo
    Lee, Young-Ouk
    Lee, Dong-Won
    Cho, Seungyon
    [J]. FUSION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 68 (03) : 652 - 656
  • [9] Neutronics assessment of the ITER first wall/shield modules
    Sawan, M. E.
    Smith, B.
    Wilson, P.
    [J]. 22ND IEEE/NPSS SYMPOSIUM ON FUSION ENGINEERING, 2007, : 42 - 47
  • [10] The ITER tokamak neutronics reference model C-Model
    Leichtle, Dieter
    Colling, Bethany
    Fabbri, Marco
    Juarez, Rafael
    Loughlin, Michael
    Pampin, Raul
    Polunovskiy, Eduard
    Serikov, Arkady
    Turner, Andrew
    Bertalot, Luciano
    [J]. FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2018, 136 : 742 - 746