A random forest classifier for protein-protein docking models

被引:5
|
作者
Barradas-Bautista, Didier [1 ]
Cao, Zhen [1 ]
Vangone, Anna [2 ]
Oliva, Romina [3 ]
Cavallo, Luigi [1 ]
Gromiha, Michael
机构
[1] King Abdullah Univ Sci & Technol KAUST, Kaust Catalysis Ctr, Phys Sci & Engn Div, Thuwal 239556900, Saudi Arabia
[2] Roche Innovat Ctr Munich Large Mol Res, Pharm Res & Early Dev, Therapeut Modal, D-82377 Penzberg, Germany
[3] Univ Parthenope Naples, Ctr Direzionale Isola C4, Dept Sci & Technol, I-80143 Naples, Italy
来源
BIOINFORMATICS ADVANCES | 2022年 / 2卷 / 01期
关键词
INTER-RESIDUE CONTACTS; PREDICTION; COMPLEXES; FEATURES; RANKING; ELECTROSTATICS; CONSERVATION; REFINEMENT; POTENTIALS; AFFINITY;
D O I
10.1093/bioadv/vbab042
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Herein, we present the results of a machine learning approach we developed to single out correct 3D docking models of protein-protein complexes obtained by popular docking software. To this aim, we generated 3x104 docking models for each of the 230 complexes in the protein-protein benchmark, version 5, using three different docking programs (HADDOCK, FTDock and ZDOCK), for a cumulative set of approximate to 7x106 docking models. Three different machine learning approaches (Random Forest, Supported Vector Machine and Perceptron) were used to train classifiers with 158 different scoring functions (features). The Random Forest algorithm outperformed the other two algorithms and was selected for further optimization. Using a features selection algorithm, and optimizing the random forest hyperparameters, allowed us to train and validate a random forest classifier, named COnservation Driven Expert System (CoDES). Testing of CoDES on independent datasets, as well as results of its comparative performance with machine learning methods recently developed in the field for the scoring of docking decoys, confirm its state-of-the-art ability to discriminate correct from incorrect decoys both in terms of global parameters and in terms of decoys ranked at the top positions.Supplementary information are available at Bioinformatics Advances online.Software and data availability statement The docking models are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4012018. The programs underlying this article will be shared on request to the corresponding authors.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Soft protein-protein docking in internal coordinates
    Fernández-Recio, J
    Totrov, M
    Abagyan, R
    PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2002, 11 (02) : 280 - 291
  • [42] Incorporating the Effects of pH in Protein-Protein Docking
    Kilambi, Krishna Praneeth
    Gray, Jeffrey J.
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 100 (03) : 216 - 216
  • [43] Convergence and combination of methods in protein-protein docking
    Vajda, Sandor
    Kozakov, Dima
    CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (02) : 164 - 170
  • [44] PROTEIN-PROTEIN RECOGNITION ANALYZED BY DOCKING SIMULATION
    CHERFILS, J
    DUQUERROY, S
    JANIN, J
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS, 1991, 11 (04): : 271 - 280
  • [45] Protein-protein docking benchmark version 3.0
    Hwang, Howook
    Pierce, Brian
    Mintseris, Julian
    Janin, Joel
    Weng, Zhiping
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2008, 73 (03) : 705 - 709
  • [46] Using MELD in flexible protein-protein docking
    Brini, Emiliano
    Dill, Ken
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 255
  • [47] DOCKGROUND protein-protein docking decoy set
    Liu, Shiyong
    Gao, Ying
    Vakser, Ilya A.
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2008, 24 (22) : 2634 - 2635
  • [48] Protein-protein docking predictions for the CAPRI experiment
    Gray, JJ
    Moughon, SE
    Kortemme, T
    Schueler-Furman, O
    Misura, KMS
    Morozov, AV
    Baker, D
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS, 2003, 52 (01): : 118 - 122
  • [49] Protein-Protein Docking: Past, Present, and Future
    Sunny, Sharon
    Jayaraj, P. B.
    PROTEIN JOURNAL, 2022, 41 (01): : 1 - 26
  • [50] What method to use for protein-protein docking?
    Porter, Kathryn A.
    Desta, Israel
    Kozakov, Dima
    Vajda, Sandor
    CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2019, 55 : 1 - 7