Patient experience with NER1006 as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective, multicenter US survey

被引:5
|
作者
Cash, Brooks D. [1 ]
Moncrief, Mary Beth C. [2 ]
Epstein, Michael S. [3 ]
Poppers, David M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Houston, Hlth Sci Ctr, Houston, TX 77004 USA
[2] Synchrony Med Commun LLC, W Chester, PA USA
[3] Investigat Clin Res & Digest Disorders Associates, Annapolis, MD USA
[4] New York Univ Langone Hlth, New York, NY USA
关键词
Bowel preparation; Cathartics; NER1006; Patient satisfaction; Plenvu; Survey; Treatment adherence; QUALITY INDICATORS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1186/s12876-021-01605-y
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background NER1006 (Plenvu(R), Salix Pharmaceuticals, Bridgewater, NJ) is a 1 L polyethylene glycol bowel preparation indicated for colonoscopy in adults. A US online survey assessed real-world ease of use and treatment satisfaction in individuals who received NER1006. Methods Adults were recruited from 444 US community gastrointestinal practices and provided a kit number for enrollment into an online survey to be completed within 2 weeks. Survey questions evaluated colonoscopy history and prior bowel preparation(s) prescribed, patient experience during NER1006 administration, and patient satisfaction with the bowel preparation process. A 9-point predefined grading scale was used to evaluate ease of NER1006 preparation and consumption (range, 1 "very difficult" to 9 "very easy"); the perceived importance of volume requirement and clear liquid options (range, 1 "not important at all" to 9 "very important"); and patient satisfaction (range, 1 "not satisfied at all" to 9 "very satisfied"). Results 1630 patients were enrolled, 1606 underwent colonoscopy, and 1598 completed the survey between September 15, 2018 and February 28, 2019. Among 1606 patients who had a colonoscopy, 62.5% were female, and the mean patient age was 54.4 years (range 18-89 years). Most patients (74.7%) did not report a family history of colon cancer, 62.6% had undergone prior colonoscopy, and 64.8% were undergoing colonoscopy for routine colorectal cancer screening. A majority (76.1%) of patients who completed the survey reported that NER1006 was very easy to prepare and take, and 89.9% were very or moderately satisfied with NER1006 overall. Most (97.6%) patients reported consuming all or most of the bowel preparation. Among 1005 patients with previous bowel preparation use, 84.7% indicated that their experience with NER1006 was much better or better (65.3%) or about the same (19.4%) compared with previously used bowel preparations, while only 15.3% rated NER1006 as worse or much worse. Conclusions In this first real-world, US multicenter survey, patient-reported experience with NER1006 as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy was favorable and adherence was high. The majority of patients were very or moderately satisfied with the overall experience and found it much better/better than previously used bowel preparations. Trial registration: Not applicable
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] HIGH QUALITY COLON CLEANSING WITH NOVEL 1L PEG-BASED BOWEL PREPARATION NER1006 VERSUS CURRENT ALTERNATIVES
    Ng, Richard
    Hassan, Cesare
    Manning, Jonathan
    Epstein, Michael
    GUT, 2018, 67 : A45 - A46
  • [22] Bowel preparation with 1L polyethylene glycol and ascorbate NER1006 doubles the chance to detect three or more adenomas in overweight or obese males
    Epstein, Michael
    Halonen, Juha
    Sharma, Prateek
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2021, 09 (09) : E1324 - E1334
  • [23] Bowel Preparation Quality of NER1006 versus Oral Trisulfate Solution as Assessed by Colonoscopists at Site: A Post hoc Analysis From a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Epstein, Michael
    Shing, Richard Ng Kwet
    Bekal, Pradeep
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 112 : S87 - S87
  • [24] CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: prospective assessment of patient experience and preference in comparison to optical colonoscopy with cathartic bowel preparation
    Sebastiaan Jensch
    Shandra Bipat
    Jan Peringa
    Ayso H. de Vries
    Anneke Heutinck
    Evelien Dekker
    Lubbertus C. Baak
    Alexander D. Montauban van Swijndregt
    Jaap Stoker
    European Radiology, 2010, 20 : 146 - 156
  • [25] CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: prospective assessment of patient experience and preference in comparison to optical colonoscopy with cathartic bowel preparation
    Jensch, Sebastiaan
    Bipat, Shandra
    Peringa, Jan
    de Vries, Ayso H.
    Heutinck, Anneke
    Dekker, Evelien
    Baak, Lubbertus C.
    van Swijndregt, Alexander D. Montauban
    Stoker, Jaap
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (01) : 146 - 156
  • [26] PLASMA ELECTROLYTE CONCENTRATIONS AFTER THE USE OF 1L POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL BOWEL PREPARATION NER1006: POST HOC ANALYSIS OF RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIALS
    Repici, Alessandro
    Alvarez-Gonzalez, Marco A.
    Thompson, Hannah
    Mokashi, Soniya
    Hassan, Cesare
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 89 (06) : AB416 - AB416
  • [27] Pharmacodynamic and Clinical Evaluation of Low-Volume Polyethylene Glycol (PEG)-Based Bowel Cleansing Solutions (NER1006) Using Split Dosing in Healthy and Screening Colonoscopy Subjects
    Halphen, Marc
    Tayo, Bola
    Flanagan, Stephen
    Clayton, Lucy
    Kornberger, Rudiger
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 109 : S189 - S189
  • [28] Efficacy and Safety of NER1006 Versus Standard Bowel Preparations: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Phase 3 Clinical Trials
    Maida, Marcello
    Macaluso, Fabio Salvatore
    Sinagra, Emanuele
    Ventimiglia, Marco
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 114 : S85 - S87
  • [29] EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF NER1006 VERSUS STANDARD BOWEL PREPARATIONS: A META-ANALYSIS OF THREE RANDOMISED PHASE 3 CLINICAL TRIALS
    Maida, M.
    Macaluso, F. S.
    Sinagra, E.
    Ventimiglia, M.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2020, 52 : S143 - S144
  • [30] Bowel Preparation Quality of Ner1006 Versus Sodium Picosulfate plus Magnesium Citrate as Assessed by Colonoscopists at Site: A Post Hoc Analysis From a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Lewis, Stephen
    Drenth, Joost
    Santander, Cecilio
    Pediconi, Claudio
    Repici, Alessandro
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (05) : AB194 - AB194