Patient experience with NER1006 as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective, multicenter US survey

被引:5
|
作者
Cash, Brooks D. [1 ]
Moncrief, Mary Beth C. [2 ]
Epstein, Michael S. [3 ]
Poppers, David M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Houston, Hlth Sci Ctr, Houston, TX 77004 USA
[2] Synchrony Med Commun LLC, W Chester, PA USA
[3] Investigat Clin Res & Digest Disorders Associates, Annapolis, MD USA
[4] New York Univ Langone Hlth, New York, NY USA
关键词
Bowel preparation; Cathartics; NER1006; Patient satisfaction; Plenvu; Survey; Treatment adherence; QUALITY INDICATORS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1186/s12876-021-01605-y
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background NER1006 (Plenvu(R), Salix Pharmaceuticals, Bridgewater, NJ) is a 1 L polyethylene glycol bowel preparation indicated for colonoscopy in adults. A US online survey assessed real-world ease of use and treatment satisfaction in individuals who received NER1006. Methods Adults were recruited from 444 US community gastrointestinal practices and provided a kit number for enrollment into an online survey to be completed within 2 weeks. Survey questions evaluated colonoscopy history and prior bowel preparation(s) prescribed, patient experience during NER1006 administration, and patient satisfaction with the bowel preparation process. A 9-point predefined grading scale was used to evaluate ease of NER1006 preparation and consumption (range, 1 "very difficult" to 9 "very easy"); the perceived importance of volume requirement and clear liquid options (range, 1 "not important at all" to 9 "very important"); and patient satisfaction (range, 1 "not satisfied at all" to 9 "very satisfied"). Results 1630 patients were enrolled, 1606 underwent colonoscopy, and 1598 completed the survey between September 15, 2018 and February 28, 2019. Among 1606 patients who had a colonoscopy, 62.5% were female, and the mean patient age was 54.4 years (range 18-89 years). Most patients (74.7%) did not report a family history of colon cancer, 62.6% had undergone prior colonoscopy, and 64.8% were undergoing colonoscopy for routine colorectal cancer screening. A majority (76.1%) of patients who completed the survey reported that NER1006 was very easy to prepare and take, and 89.9% were very or moderately satisfied with NER1006 overall. Most (97.6%) patients reported consuming all or most of the bowel preparation. Among 1005 patients with previous bowel preparation use, 84.7% indicated that their experience with NER1006 was much better or better (65.3%) or about the same (19.4%) compared with previously used bowel preparations, while only 15.3% rated NER1006 as worse or much worse. Conclusions In this first real-world, US multicenter survey, patient-reported experience with NER1006 as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy was favorable and adherence was high. The majority of patients were very or moderately satisfied with the overall experience and found it much better/better than previously used bowel preparations. Trial registration: Not applicable
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient experience with NER1006 as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective, multicenter US survey
    Brooks D. Cash
    Mary Beth C. Moncrief
    Michael S. Epstein
    David M. Poppers
    BMC Gastroenterology, 21
  • [2] Patient Experience With NER1006 as a Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Prospective, Multicenter US Survey
    Cash, Brooks D.
    Moncrief, Mary Beth
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 114 : S309 - S309
  • [3] ASSESSMENT OF PATIENT SATISFACTION WITH NER1006 AND TRISULFATE BOWEL PREPARATIONS FOR COLONOSCOPY: A PHASE 3, RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTER TRIAL
    Epstein, Michael
    Heimanson, Zeev
    Amlani, Bharat
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (06) : AB535 - AB535
  • [4] Electrolyte Shifts of NER1006 Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in the Elderly Are Transient and Well-Tolerated
    Epstein, Michael S.
    Lorenzen, Sarah
    Franklin, Howard
    Cash, Brooks D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 114 : S306 - S307
  • [5] ADENOMA DETECTION RATES WITH 1 L NER1006 BOWEL PREPARATION EXCEED MINIMUM THRESHOLD RECOMMENDATIONS IN COLONOSCOPY SCREENING POPULATION AND NER1006 DEMONSTRATES OVERALL BOWEL CLEANSING SUCCESS REGARDLESS OF COLONOSCOPY INDICATION
    Schoenfeld, Phillip
    Poppers, David M.
    Lorenzen, Sarah
    Sharma, Prateek
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 91 (06) : AB566 - AB566
  • [6] SAFETY OF NER1006 IN ELDERLY: A POST-HOC ANALYSIS OF A PROSPECTIVE, MULTICENTER COHORT
    Maida, M.
    Sferrazza, S.
    Sinagra, E.
    Morreale, G.
    Scalisi, G.
    Schillaci, D.
    Vettori, G.
    Conoscenti, G.
    Di Bartolo, C.
    Catarella, D.
    Garufi, S.
    Manganaro, M.
    Virgilio, C. M.
    Camilleri, S.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2020, 52 : S139 - S139
  • [7] Safety, efficacy and tolerability of an ultra-low volume bowel preparation (NER1006) - a real world experience
    Sakiris, Anthony
    Rajandran, Arvinf
    Lynch, Jane
    Rivlin, Myles
    John, Sneha
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2024, 39 : 266 - 266
  • [8] Safety of NER1006 in the Elderly: A Post-Hoc Analysis of a Prospective, Multicenter Cohort
    Maida, Marcello
    Sferrazza, Sandro
    Sinagra, Emanuele
    Morreale, Gaetano
    Manganaro, Michele
    Scalisi, Giuseppe
    Schillaci, Dario
    Vettori, Giovanni
    Conoscenti, Giuseppe
    Di Bartolo, Concetta
    Garufi, Serena
    Virgilio, Clara Maria
    Camilleri, Salvatore
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 114 : S88 - S88
  • [9] Efficacy and Safety of the 1 Liter NER1006 Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in Adults With Comorbid Conditions That May Impact Prep Quality
    Cash, Brooks D.
    Poppers, David
    Yoon, Soo Han
    Allen, Christopher
    Sharma, Prateek
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 119 (10S): : S263 - S263
  • [10] Adenoma Detection After NER1006 Bowel Preparation May Identify Men Who Require Shorter Colonoscopy Surveillance Periods
    Epstein, Michael
    Allen, Christopher
    Halonen, Juha
    Sharma, Prateek
    TECHNIQUES AND INNOVATIONS IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 24 (01): : 111 - 113