Developing and Evaluating Multiple-Choice Tests for Trustworthiness

被引：1

作者：

Bernhofer, Esther, I ^{[1
,2
]}

Burchill, Christian N. ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Cleveland Clin, Off Res & Innovat, Nursing Inst, 9500 Euclid Ave T-42, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA

[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Frances Payne Bolton Sch Nursing, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA

[3] Cleveland Clin, Off Nursing Res & Innovat, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA

来源：

JOURNAL FOR NURSES IN PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT | 2019年 / 35卷 / 04期

关键词：

VALIDITY;

D O I：

10.1097/NND.0000000000000539

中图分类号：

R47 [护理学];

学科分类号：

1011 ;

摘要：

This article provides the nursing professional development practitioner an overview of effective development and evaluation of a commonly used measure of knowledge: the multiple-choice test. Basic principles of test development and assessment are important for evaluating learning outcomes. When the steps needed to determine the fairness, validity, and reliability of multiple-choice tests are followed, the resulting knowledge tests will lead to more trustworthy results for the evaluation of nursing professional development activities.

引用

页码：204 / 209

页数：6

共 50 条

[31] DETECTION OF COPYING ON MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTS - AN UPDATE
BELLEZZA, FS
BELLEZZA, SF
TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 22 (03) : 180 - 182
[32] COMPARISON OF 2 MULTIPLE-CHOICE RORSCHACH TESTS
LANGER, P
WOOD, CG
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1965, 20 (01) : 143 - 150
[33] An Experimental Validation of Sequential Multiple-Choice Tests
Papenberg, Martin
Diedenhofen, Birk
Musch, Jochen
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 2021, 89 (02): : 402 - 421
[34] Multiple-Choice Tests, Negative Marks and an Alternative
Karandikar, Rajeeva L.
RESONANCE-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2006, 11 (03): : 86 - 93
[35] Bootstrapping Multiple-Choice Tests with THE-MENTOR
Mendes, Ana Cristina
Curto, Sergio
Coheur, Luisa
COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS AND INTELLIGENT TEXT PROCESSING, PT I, 2011, 6608 : 451 - 462
[36] Multiple-choice tests, negative marks and an alternative
Rajeeva L. Karandikar
Resonance, 2006, 11 (3) : 86 - 93
[37] AN UPPER BOUND OF RELIABILITY FOR MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTS
CLEMANS, WV
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1960, 15 (07) : 487 - 487
[38] MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTS - TIME FOR A SECOND LOOK
DUDLEY, HAF
LANCET, 1973, 2 (7822): : 195 - 196
[39] Optimizing multiple-choice tests as tools for learning
Jeri L. Little
Elizabeth Ligon Bjork
Memory & Cognition, 2015, 43 : 14 - 26
[40] AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF MULTIPLE-CHOICE AND ESSAY TESTS
KRUGLAK, H
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1965, 33 (10) : 876 - &

← 1 2 3 4 5 →