Oncological outcome after local treatment for early stage rectal cancer

被引:6
|
作者
Witjes, Caroline D. M. [1 ]
Patel, Abhilashaben S. [1 ]
Shenoy, Aniruddh [1 ]
Boyce, Stephen [1 ]
East, James E. [2 ,3 ]
Cunningham, Christopher [1 ]
机构
[1] NHS Fdn Trust, Churchill Hosp, Oxford Univ Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Old Rd, Oxford OX3 7LE, England
[2] Univ Oxford, John Radcliffe Hosp, Nuffield Dept Med, Translat Gastroenterol Unit, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Oxford NIHR Biomed Res Ctr, Oxford, England
关键词
Early rectal cancer; Local treatment; Polypectomy (EMR; ESD); TEM; TAMIS; RADICAL SURGERY; MANAGEMENT; EXCISION; RESECTION; POLYPS; EMR;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-021-08308-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Treatment of early rectal cancer is evolving towards organ-preserving therapy which includes endoscopic resection and transanal approaches. We aimed to explore the role of local treatments such as endoscopic polypectomy (Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) or Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)) and transanal endoscopic microsurgery/ transanal minimal invasive surgery (TEM/TAMIS) in patients who had early rectal cancer. We considered these outcomes alongside conventional major surgery using total mesorectal excision (TME) for early stage disease. Methods All patients identified at MDT with early stage rectal cancer at our institution between 2010 and 2019 were included. Long-term outcomes in terms of local recurrence, survival and procedure-specific morbidity were analysed. Results In total, 536 patients with rectal cancer were identified, of which 112 were included based on their pre-operative identification at the MDT on the basis that they had node-negative early rectal cancer. Among these, 30 patients (27%) had the lesion excised by flexible endoscopic polypectomy techniques (EMR/ESD), 67 (60%) underwent TEM/TAMIS and 15 (13%) had major surgery. There were no differences in patient demographics between the three groups except for TEM/TAMIS patients being more likely to be referred from another hospital (p < 0.001) and they were less active (WHO performance status p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in overall survival rates and cancer-specific survival between the three treatment groups. The 5-year overall survival rate for endoscopic polypectomy, TEM/TAMIS or major resection was 96% versus 90% and 88%, respectively (p = 0.89). The 5- year cancer-specific survival rate was 96%, versus 96% and 100%, respectively (p = 0.74). Conclusion Endoscopic polypectomy by EMR/ESD is an appropriate local treatment for early stage rectal cancer in selected patients. It is possible to achieve good oncological outcomes with a polypectomy similar to TEM/TAMIS and major surgery; however, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary enabling close surveillance and the use of adjuvant radiotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 497
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pretreatment MRI in Primary Rectal Cancer as a Predictor for Oncological Outcomes After Surgery for Local Recurrence
    Elliot, Anders H.
    Othman, Barwar N.
    Suzuki, Chikako
    Blomqvist, Lennart
    Martling, Anna
    Johansson, Hemming
    Glimelius, Bengt
    Nilsson, Per J.
    Iversen, Henrik
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 41 (05) : 2459 - 2465
  • [42] ACR Appropriateness Criteria®: Local Excision in Early-Stage Rectal Cancer
    Blackstock, William
    Russo, Suzanne M.
    Suh, W. Warren
    Cosman, Bard C.
    Herman, Joseph
    Mohiuddin, Mohammed
    Poggi, Matthew M.
    Regine, William F.
    Saltz, Leonard
    Small, William, Jr.
    Zook, Jennifer
    Konski, Andre A.
    [J]. CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CANCER, 2010, 34 (03) : 193 - 200
  • [43] FACTORS INFLUENCING THE USE OF LOCAL EXCISION FOR EARLY STAGE RECTAL CANCER.
    Gillern, S.
    Mahmoud, N.
    Paulson, E.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2014, 57 (05) : E102 - E102
  • [44] Origin of presacral local recurrence after rectal cancer treatment
    Kusters, M.
    Wallner, C.
    Lange, M. M.
    DeRuiter, M. C.
    van de Velde, C. J. H.
    Moriya, Y.
    Rutten, H. J. T.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 (10) : 1582 - 1587
  • [45] Symptoms and diagnosis of local recurrence after rectal cancer treatment
    Waldenstedt, Sophia
    Haglind, Eva
    Angenete, Eva
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2022, 61 (09) : 1043 - 1049
  • [46] Surgical and oncological results after rectal resections with or without previous treatment for prostate cancer
    Tomminen, T.
    Huhtala, H.
    Kotaluoto, S.
    Veitonmaki, T.
    Wirta, E. -, V
    Hyoty, M.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2024, 11
  • [47] Clinical and oncological results of the pathological complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment
    Codina Cazador, Antonio
    Farres Coll, Ramon
    Olivet Pujol, Francesc
    Martin Grillo, Adam
    Pujadas de Palol, Marcel
    Gomez Romeu, Nuria
    Julia Bergkvist, David
    Ortiz Duran, Rosa
    Diez Gomez, Ester
    [J]. CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2013, 91 (07): : 417 - 423
  • [48] Local treatment of rectal cancer
    Pidala, MJ
    Oliver, GC
    [J]. AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 1997, 56 (06) : 1622 - 1628
  • [49] Oncological Outcomes After Anastomotic Leakage After Surgery for Colon or Rectal Cancer Increased Risk of Local Recurrence
    Koedam, Thomas W. A.
    Bootsma, Boukje T.
    Deijen, Charlotte L.
    van de Brug, Tim
    Kazemier, Geert
    Cuesta, Miguel A.
    Furst, Alois
    Lacy, Antonio M.
    Haglind, Eva
    Tuynman, Jurriaan B.
    Daams, Freek
    Bonjer, Hendrik J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2022, 275 (02) : E420 - E427
  • [50] Rectal washout during abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer has no impact on the oncological outcome
    Neufert, Rebecca Svensson
    Jorgren, Fredrik
    Buchwald, Pamela
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2022, 24 (03) : 284 - 291