Medical resource use in 39 weeks elective induction versus expectant management: stratified by bishop score

被引：0
|
作者：
Costantine, Maged M. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Eunice Kennedy Shriver Natl Inst Child Hlth & Hum, Bethesda, MD USA
来源：
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2021年 / 224卷 / 02期
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号：
100211 ;
摘要：
228
引用
收藏
页码：S151 / S151
页数：1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Maternal and perinatal outcome of induction at 39 weeks versus expectant management in labor after cesarean section
    Meyer, Raanan
    Levin, Gabriel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 159 (02) : 480 - 486
  • [22] A randomized trial of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management of low-risk nulliparous women
    Grobman, William
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : S601 - S601
  • [23] Maternal Outcomes Associated With Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks Compared With Expectant Management
    Rossi, Jordan
    Contag, Stephen
    Burn, Sabrina
    Diaz, Maria
    Yao, Ruofan
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 111S - 112S
  • [24] Factors associated with adverse outcomes in nulliparas at 39 weeks with induction or expectant management
    El-Sayed, Yasser Y.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S20 - S20
  • [25] Elective induction of labor versus expectant management at 39 weeks among low-risk nulliparous pregnant women: A randomized controlled trial in India (ELITE-39 trial)
    Lalithadevi, Palaparthi
    Rengaraj, Sasirekha
    Dasari, Paapa
    Adhisivam, Bethovu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2024, 167 (01) : 427 - 433
  • [26] Systematic Review: Elective Induction of Labor Versus Expectant Management of Pregnancy
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    Sundaram, Vandana
    Kaimal, Anjali J.
    Gienger, Allison
    Cheng, Yvonne W.
    McDonald, Kathryn M.
    Shaffer, Brian L.
    Owens, Douglas K.
    Bravata, Dena M.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 151 (04) : 252 - W63
  • [27] Induction of labor versus expectant management for pregnancies beyond 41 weeks
    Daskalakis, George
    Zacharakis, Dimitrios
    Simou, Maria
    Pappa, Peny
    Detorakis, Stelios
    Mesogitis, Spyros
    Antsaklis, Aris
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2014, 27 (02): : 173 - 176
  • [28] Health resource utilization of labor induction versus expectant management
    Grobman, William A.
    Sandoval, Grecio
    Reddy, Uma M.
    Tita, Alan T. N.
    Silver, Robert M.
    Mallett, Gail
    Hill, Kim
    Rice, Madeline Murguia
    El-Sayed, Yasser Y.
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Saade, George R.
    Thorp, John M., Jr.
    Chauhan, Suneet P.
    Iams, Jay D.
    Chien, Edward K.
    Casey, Brian M.
    Gibbs, Ronald S.
    Srinivas, Sindhu K.
    Swamy, Geeta K.
    Simhan, Hyagriv N.
    Macones, George A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (04)
  • [29] Elective Induction versus Expectant Management of Mild Pre-Eclampsia at Term
    Meher-un-Nisa
    Anjum, Saba
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2018, 28 (09): : 677 - 680
  • [30] Elective Labor Induction at 39 Weeks of Gestation Compared With Expectant Management Factors Associated With Adverse Outcomes in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women
    El-Sayed, Yasser Y.
    Rice, Madeline Murguia
    Grobman, William A.
    Reddy, Uma M.
    Tita, Alan T. N.
    Silver, Robert M.
    Mallett, Gail
    Hill, Kim
    Thom, Elizabeth A.
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Saade, George R.
    Thorp, John M., Jr.
    Chauhan, Suneet P.
    Chien, Edward K.
    Casey, Brian M.
    Gibbs, Ronald S.
    Srinivas, Sindhu K.
    Swamy, Geeta K.
    Simhan, Hyagriv N.
    Macones, George A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 136 (04): : 692 - 697
12345