Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps

被引:112
|
作者
Tsirbas, A [1 ]
Wormald, PJ
机构
[1] Flinders Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Bedford Pk, SA 5042, Australia
[2] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Dept Surg Otorhinolaryngol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bjo.87.1.43
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Aims: To describe and assess the efficacy of mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (MENDCR). This is a new technique that involves creation of a large rhinostomy and mucosal flaps. The study involved a prospective nonrandomised interventional case series with short perioperative follow up. Method: A prospective series of 104 consecutive endonasal DCRs performed from January 1999 to December 2001 were entered into the study. Patients included in the study had nasolacrimal duct obstruction and had not had previous lacrimal surgery. The technique involved anastomosis of nasal mucosal and lacrimal sac flaps and a large bony ostium. Surgery was performed by two surgeons (AT/PJW). Follow up assessment included nasoendoscopy as well as symptom evaluation. Success was defined as anatomical potency with fluorescein flow on nasoendoscopy and patency to lacrimal syringing. The average follow up time was 9.7 months (range 2-28, SD 6.7 months). Results: There were 104 DCRs performed on 86 patients (30 male, 56 female). The average age of the patients was 59 years (range 3-89, SD 24.1 years). Common presentations were epiphora (77%) and/or mucocele (19%). Septoplasty (SMR) was required in 48 DCRs (46%) and 13 DCRs (12.5%) needed other endoscopic surgery in conjunction with the lacrimal surgery. The surgery was successful in 93 cases (89%). Of the 11 cases that were classified as a failure six patients was anatomically patent but still symptomatic and another two had preoperative canalicular problems. The anatomical patency with this new technique was thus 95% (99 of 104 DCRs). Conclusion: MENDCR involves creation of a large ostium and mucosal preservation for the construction of flaps. The anatomical success is 95% and is similar to external DCR and better then other endonasal approaches. The authors suggest that creation of a large ostium as well as mucosal flaps improves the efficacy of this endonasal technique.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 47
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] New mucosal flap modification for endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in Asians
    Qing-Shan Ji
    Jing-Xiang Zhong
    Yun-Hai Tu
    Wen-Can Wu
    International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2012, (06) : 704 - 707
  • [22] ENDONASAL DACRYOCYSTORHINOSTOMY
    OOSTERHUIS, JA
    SEDEE, E
    OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 1976, 173 (05) : 417 - 419
  • [23] ENDONASAL DACRYOCYSTORHINOSTOMY
    JOKINEN, K
    KARJA, J
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1974, 100 (01) : 41 - 44
  • [24] Anastomosis of nasal mucosal and lacrimal sac flaps in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy
    Trimarchi, Matteo
    Resti, A. Giordano
    Bellini, C.
    Forti, M.
    Bussi, M.
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2009, 266 (11) : 1747 - 1752
  • [25] Anastomosis of nasal mucosal and lacrimal sac flaps in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy
    Matteo Trimarchi
    A. Giordano Resti
    C. Bellini
    M. Forti
    M. Bussi
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2009, 266 : 1747 - 1752
  • [26] INDICATIONS FOR ENDONASAL DACRYOCYSTORHINOSTOMY
    EGOROV, EA
    BELOGLAZOV, VG
    VESTNIK OFTALMOLOGII, 1974, (05) : 75 - 76
  • [27] Mastering endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy
    Fayet, B
    Racy, E
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2005, 28 (04): : 437 - 442
  • [28] Comparative Study of Endonasal Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy with or without Preservation of Nasal Mucosal Flap
    Chacko, Aneena
    Yashveer, J. K.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2024, 76 (01) : 894 - 898
  • [29] Endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy
    Von Arx, G
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 82 (08) : 976 - 976
  • [30] The Evolution of Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy
    Oguz, H
    SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2004, 49 (05) : 543 - 543