Building capacity for palliative care delivery in primary care settings Mixed methods evaluation of the INTEGRATE Project

被引:13
|
作者
Evans, Jenna M. [1 ,2 ]
Mackinnon, Marnie [3 ]
Pereira, Jose [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Earle, Craig C. [7 ,8 ,9 ,10 ]
Gagnon, Bruno [11 ]
Arthurs, Erin [12 ]
Gradin, Sharon [12 ]
Walton, Tara [12 ]
Wright, Frances [13 ]
Buchman, Sandy [14 ]
机构
[1] Canc Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Canc Care Ontario, Integrated Care, Mississauga, ON, Canada
[4] Coll Family Phys Canada, Res, Mississauga, ON, Canada
[5] Queens Univ, Palliat Care Res, Kingston, ON, Canada
[6] Pallium Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada
[7] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Odette Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Canadian Partnership Canc, Canc Control, Toronto, ON, Canada
[9] ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
[10] Univ Toronto, Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[11] Laval Univ, Canc Res Ctr, Dept Family Med & Emergency Med, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[12] Canc Care Ontario, Integrated Care, Toronto, ON, Canada
[13] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[14] Sinai Hlth Syst, Temmy Latner Ctr Palliat Care, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
END-OF-LIFE; SURPRISE QUESTION; ADVANCED CANCER; PERFORMANCE SCALE; DEATH; HOME; IMPACT; TRIAL; TEAM;
D O I
10.46747/cfp.6704270
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate an intervention aimed at building capacity to deliver palliative care in primary care settings. Design The INTEGRATE Project was a 3-year pilot project involving interprofessional palliative care education and an integrated care model to promote early identification and support of patients with palliative care needs. A concurrent mixed-methods evaluation was conducted using descriptive data, provider surveys before and after implementation, and interviews with providers and managers. Setting Four primary care practices in Ontario. Participants All providers in each practice were invited to participate. Providers used the surprise question-as a prompt to determine patient eligibility for inclusion. Main outcome measures Provider attitudes toward and confidence in providing palliative care, use of palliative care tools, delivery of palliative care, and perceived barriers to delivering palliative care. Results A total of 294 patients were identified for early initiation of palliative care, most of whom had multiple comorbid conditions. Results demonstrated improvement in provider confidence to deliver palliative care (30% mean increase, P < .05) and self-reported use of palliative care tools and services (25% mean increase, P < .05). There was substantial variation across practices regarding the percentage of patients identified using the surprise question (0.2% to 1.5%), the number of advance care planning conversations initiated (50% to 90%), and mean time to conversation (13 to 76 days). This variation is attributable, in part, to contextual differences across practices. Conclusion A standardized model for the early introduction of palliative care to patients can be integrated into the routine practice of primary care practitioners with appropriate training and support. Additional research is needed to understand the practice factors that contribute to the success of palliative care interventions in primary care and to examine patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 278
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Building evidence and capacity in global health palliative care
    Harding, Richard
    ECANCERMEDICALSCIENCE, 2022, 16
  • [32] A mixed methods evaluation of medication reconciliation in the primary care setting
    Gionfriddo, Michael R.
    Duboski, Vanessa
    Middernacht, Allison
    Kern, Melissa S.
    Graham, Jove
    Wright, Eric A.
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (12):
  • [33] Evaluation Of Community Palliative Care Settings: a discussion of the issues
    Tan, H.
    O'Connor, M.
    Peters, L.
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2012, 7 (01): : 43 - 48
  • [34] Understanding integrated care pathways in palliative care using realist evaluation: a mixed methods study protocol
    Dalkin, Sonia Michelle
    Jones, Diana
    Lhussier, Monique
    Cunningham, Bill
    BMJ OPEN, 2012, 2 (04):
  • [35] Jordan palliative care and pain initiative 2011: building capacity for palliative care programs in public hospitals
    Bushnaq, Mohammad
    Abusuqair, R. N. Fadi
    PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE, 2012, 20 (04) : 203 - 207
  • [36] Fostering humanism: a mixed methods evaluation of the Footprints Project in critical care
    Hoad, Neala
    Swinton, Marilyn
    Takaoka, Alyson
    Tam, Benjamin
    Shears, Melissa
    Waugh, Lily
    Toledo, Feli
    Clarke, France J.
    Duan, Erick Huaileigh
    Soth, Mark
    Cook, Deborah J.
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (11):
  • [37] Primary Palliative Care Delivery Across Mayo Clinic
    Ingram, Cory
    Bechtum, Elizabeth L.
    Brunner, Jessica
    Squire, Karina M.
    Henderson, Erin A.
    Larson, Kate J.
    Schreiber, Jennifer P.
    Bunkers, Kari
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2016, 52 (06) : E44 - E45
  • [38] Obstacles to the delivery of primary palliative care as perceived by GPs
    Groot, Marieke M.
    Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra J. F. J.
    Verhagen, Stans C. A.
    Crul, Ben J. P.
    Groll, Richard P. T. M.
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2007, 21 (08) : 697 - 703
  • [39] Dushanbe - Building capacity for primary care in Tajikistan
    Mashta, O
    LANCET, 2000, 355 (9200): : 295 - 295
  • [40] Building capacity for African Primary Care Research
    Ayankogbe, Olayinka O.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE & FAMILY MEDICINE, 2014, 6 (01)