Tillage effect on nutrient stratification in narrow- and wide-row cropping systems

被引:34
|
作者
Bauer, PJ
Frederick, JR
Busscher, WJ
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Coastal Plains Soil Water & Plant Res Ctr, Florence, SC 29501 USA
[2] Clemson Univ, Pee Dee Res & Educ Ctr, Florence, SC 29506 USA
来源
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH | 2002年 / 66卷 / 02期
关键词
wheat; soybean; corn; subsoiling; conservation tillage; phosphorous; potassium; calcium; magnesium;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-1987(02)00025-9
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Recent research has indicated that conservation systems with narrow-rows have potential for higher crop productivity on southeastern USA Coastal Plains Soil. The objective of this study was to determine how surface tillage and subsoiling affect nutrient distribution in the soil profile in narrow- and wide-row systems. A secondary objective was to determine the effect of row position on soil pH and nutrient concentrations in the wide-row system. Soil samples were collected in 1996 from plots that had been growing soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) double cropped with wheat (Tritiucum aestivum L.) for 3 years and then again in 1999 after 3 years of continuous corn (Zea mays L.). Narrow-row spacing was 19 cm for soybean and 38 cm for corn. Wide-row spacing was 76 cm for both soybean and corn. Wheat was grown in 19 cm wide-rows. Soil samples were randomly collected from throughout the plots in the narrow-row culture. In the wide-row culture, separate samples were collected from the row and from between rows. Treatments were surface tillage (disc tillage (DT) and no surface tillage (NT)), with different frequencies of subsoiling. The soil type was Goldsboro loamy sand (fine-loamy, siliceous, thermic, Aquic Kandiudult). Soil samples from four depths (the surface 5 cm of the A horizon, the remainder of the A horizon, the E horizon, and the top 7.5 cm of the B horizon) were analyzed for pH, P, K, Ca, and Mg. Nutrient concentrations and pH differed little between row spacings at any depth after either 3 or 6 years. Differences due to subsoiling appeared mainly due to nutrient removal as the treatments with more intense subsoiling had higher yield and lower concentrations of nutrients (except K). Concentrations of P, Mg, and Ca at the soil surface tended to be higher in NT than in DT, especially in the mid-rows of the 76 cm wide-row systems. The data suggest only small differences in soil nutrient stratification can be expected as growers adopt narrow-row crop production systems with intensive subsoiling. Published by Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 182
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anoda cristata control with glyphosate in narrow- and wide-row soyabean
    Puricelli, E
    Faccini, D
    Orioli, G
    Sabbatini, MR
    WEED RESEARCH, 2004, 44 (03) : 150 - 156
  • [2] Weed management in narrow- and wide-row glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max)
    Young, BG
    Young, JM
    Gonzini, LC
    Hart, SE
    Wax, LM
    Kapusta, G
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 15 (01) : 112 - 121
  • [3] Spurred anoda (Anoda cristata) competition in narrow- and wide-row soybean (Glycine max)
    Puricelli, EC
    Faccini, DE
    Orioli, GA
    Sabbatini, MR
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 17 (03) : 446 - 451
  • [4] Late-season common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) interference in narrow- and wide-row soybean
    Steckel, LE
    Sprague, CL
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 18 (04) : 947 - 952
  • [5] WEED-CONTROL IN NARROW AND WIDE-ROW SOYBEANS
    WAX, LM
    NAVE, WR
    COOPER, RL
    WEED SCIENCE, 1977, 25 (01) : 73 - 78
  • [6] Interseeded cover crops in wide-row corn: An opportunity for northern cropping systems
    Goettl, Brady
    Andersen, Bryce
    Desutter, Thomas
    Franzen, David
    Wick, Abbey
    CROP FORAGE & TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT, 2024, 10 (01)
  • [7] Weed management in wide-row cropping systems: a review of current practices and risks for Australian farming systems
    Peltzer, S. C.
    Hashem, A.
    Osten, V. A.
    Gupta, M. L.
    Diggle, A. J.
    Riethmuller, G. P.
    Douglas, A.
    Moore, J. M.
    Koetz, E. A.
    CROP & PASTURE SCIENCE, 2009, 60 (05): : 395 - 406
  • [8] EXPLANATIONS FOR GREATER LIGHT INTERCEPTION IN NARROW-ROW VS WIDE-ROW SOYBEAN
    BOARD, JE
    HARVILLE, BG
    CROP SCIENCE, 1992, 32 (01) : 198 - 202
  • [9] Reduced surface runoff losses of metolachlor in narrow-row compared to wide-row soybean
    Krutz, L. Jason
    Koger, Clifford H., III
    Loke, Martin A.
    Steinriede, Robert W., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2007, 36 (05) : 1331 - 1337
  • [10] MICRO-CLIMATE OF NARROW-ROW AND WIDE-ROW SORGHUM WITH EQUAL PLANT DENSITIES
    OWONUBI, JJ
    KANEMASU, ET
    POWERS, WL
    AGRICULTURAL METEOROLOGY, 1975, 15 (01): : 61 - 69