Reduced surface runoff losses of metolachlor in narrow-row compared to wide-row soybean

被引:4
|
作者
Krutz, L. Jason
Koger, Clifford H., III
Loke, Martin A.
Steinriede, Robert W., Jr.
机构
[1] USDA ARS, So Weed Sci Res Unit, Stoneville, MS 38776 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Crop Genet & Prod Res Unit, Stoneville, MS 38776 USA
[3] USDA ARS, Natl Sedimentat Lab, Oxford, MS 38655 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq2006.0548
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Cultural management practices that reduce the off-site transport of herbicides applied to row crops are needed to protect surface water quality. 4 soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]field study was conducted near Stoneville, MS on Sharkey clay to evaluate row sparing (50 cm vs. 100 cm) effects' on metolachlor [2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-metfiylphenyl)-N-(methoxy-1-methylethlyl) acetamide] transport. One day after, the foliar application of metolachlor to 2.03 m wide by 2.43m long plots, 60 mm h(-1) of simulated rainfall was applied until 25 min of runoff was generated per plot. The calculated mass of metolachlor intercepted by the soybean foliage was greater in narrow-row than wide-row soybean, 0.39 kg ha(-1). vs. 0.23 kg ha(-1), respectively. Field and laboratory, studies indicated that less than 2%, of the metolachlor intercepted by the soybean foliage was available for foliar wash-off 1 d after application. Antecedent, soil water content at the start of the simulations was lower in narrow-row soybean. In turn, there was a 1.7-fold greater time, to runoff on narrow-row plots. The, greater time to runoff,likely contributed to lower metolachlor concentration in runoff from narrow-row plots. Cumulative' metolachlor losses were significantly greater in wide-row than narrow-row soybean, 3.7% vs. 2.2%, respectively. Findings indicate that narrow-row planting, systems may reduce, 1 metolachlor runoff following a post-emergence application.
引用
收藏
页码:1331 / 1337
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EXPLANATIONS FOR GREATER LIGHT INTERCEPTION IN NARROW-ROW VS WIDE-ROW SOYBEAN
    BOARD, JE
    HARVILLE, BG
    CROP SCIENCE, 1992, 32 (01) : 198 - 202
  • [2] MICRO-CLIMATE OF NARROW-ROW AND WIDE-ROW SORGHUM WITH EQUAL PLANT DENSITIES
    OWONUBI, JJ
    KANEMASU, ET
    POWERS, WL
    AGRICULTURAL METEOROLOGY, 1975, 15 (01): : 61 - 69
  • [3] Wide-row vs. narrow-row production of dry beans in the Vauxhall irrigated rotation study.
    Larney, F. J.
    Pearson, D. C.
    Blackshaw, R. E.
    Lupwayi, N. Z.
    Regitnig, P. J.
    Balasubramanian, P.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2011, 91 (02) : 370 - 371
  • [4] DIFFERENTIAL MORTALITY RESPONSE OF LEPIDOPTERAN DEFOLIATORS TO INSECTICIDES DEPOSITED WITHIN 3 STRATA OF WIDE-ROW AND NARROW-ROW SOYBEANS
    HUTCHINS, SH
    PITRE, HN
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 1987, 80 (06) : 1244 - 1248
  • [5] Weed management in wide- and narrow-row glyphosate resistant soybean
    Nelson, KA
    Renner, KA
    JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1999, 12 (03): : 460 - 465
  • [6] A CRITERION FOR ACCEPTANCE OF NARROW-ROW CULTURE IN SOYBEAN
    BOARD, JE
    HARVILLE, BG
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1994, 86 (06) : 1103 - 1106
  • [7] WEED-CONTROL IN NARROW AND WIDE-ROW SOYBEANS
    WAX, LM
    NAVE, WR
    COOPER, RL
    WEED SCIENCE, 1977, 25 (01) : 73 - 78
  • [8] Water, sediment, and metolachlor transport differences between wide- and narrow-row cotton production systems
    Krutz, L. J.
    Locke, M. A.
    Steinriede, R. W., Jr.
    Reddy, K. N.
    Libous-Bailey, L.
    Burke, I. C.
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2012, 67 (01) : 8 - 15
  • [9] NARROW-ROW SEED-YIELD ENHANCEMENT IN DETERMINATE SOYBEAN
    BOARD, JE
    HARVILLE, BG
    SAXTON, AM
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1990, 82 (01) : 64 - 68
  • [10] Weed management in narrow- and wide-row glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max)
    Young, BG
    Young, JM
    Gonzini, LC
    Hart, SE
    Wax, LM
    Kapusta, G
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 15 (01) : 112 - 121