The Metrics of Societal Happiness

被引:30
|
作者
Tay, Louis [1 ,2 ]
Chan, David [1 ]
Diener, Ed [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Management Univ, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[4] Gallup Org Inc, Omaha, NE USA
关键词
Measurement; Subjective well-being; Happiness; Societies; National index; Experience sampling method; Ecological momentary assessment; Day reconstruction method; Life evaluations; Reliability; Validity; LIFE SATISFACTION; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; PHYSIOLOGICAL PROCESSES; MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; MOMENTARY ASSESSMENT; POSITIVE EMOTIONS; SOCIAL SUPPORT; VALENCE FOCUS; BUILD THEORY; TIME USE;
D O I
10.1007/s11205-013-0356-1
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Growing interest in the measurement of subjective well-being (SWB) has also been accompanied by scientific debate on the optimal method for measuring SWB. The momentary perspective, which is represented by the ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and day reconstruction method (DRM), emphasizes the momentary experiences and aims to measure SWB in an objective manner via the aggregation of happiness levels over time and activities. The global reporting perspective emphasizes the subjective evaluation of life experiences and aims to capture the overall evaluation using retrospection or global evaluations. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these different perspectives and methods by examining conceptual, methodological, and practical issues. We propose adopting a multi-method assessment approach to SWB that uses both perspectives and the corresponding methods in a theory-driven and complementary manner. For the purposes of measuring and tracking SWB of societies, we also call for more research on the reliability and validity of EMA and DRM.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 600
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条