Factors associated with positive margins in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and postconization management

被引:54
|
作者
Chen, Yaxia [1 ]
Lu, Hongxian [2 ]
Wan, Xiaoyun [1 ]
Lv, Weiguo [1 ]
Xie, Xing [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Jinhua Guangfu Hosp, Dept Gynecol, Jinhua, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Cold knife conization; Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP); Positive margins; Treatment; ELECTROSURGICAL EXCISION PROCEDURE; INCOMPLETE EXCISION; LOOP EXCISION; COLD KNIFE; IN-SITU; RISK; CONIZATION; METAANALYSIS; GUIDELINES; DYSPLASIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.05.027
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the risk factors for positive margins in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 3 and the outcomes of postconization management. Methods: A retrospective review of the records of 1113 women who underwent conization for CIN 3 between 2000 and 2008. Results: Positive margins Occurred in the following: 104 (10.7%) women with severe dysplasia versus 37 (26.2%) with carcinoma in situ; 32 (4.8%) treated with cold knife conization versus 109 (24.1%) treated with the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP); and 124 (11.6%) premenopausal versus 17 (35.4%) postmenopausal women. None of the women with severe dysplasia had invasive disease in the repeat excision specimen, whereas 3 (8.6%) women with carcinoma in situ had residual microinvasive carcinoma. Conclusion: LEEP, carcinoma in situ. menopausal status, and larger area of lesion are risk factors for positive margins. For women with CIN 3 and positive margins, follow-up at an interval of 6 months or repeat excision are treatment options. However, when repeat excision is technically impossible, whether simple hysterectomy or radical surgery is a rational treatment option requires further investigation. (C) 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 110
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The management and follow-up of patients with high-grade cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia
    Mani, M
    Lavie, O
    Comerci, G
    Cross, PA
    Bolger, B
    Lopes, A
    Monaghan, JM
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 1998, 8 (04) : 287 - 291
  • [22] Adherence to Management Recommendations in Patients Diagnosed With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2 or 3
    Alston, Meredith J.
    Scaparotti, Alexis C.
    Krull, Mona B.
    Mazzoni, Sara E.
    JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 2016, 20 (01) : 44 - 46
  • [23] Laser conization of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3: Free resection margins indicative of lesion-free survival
    Bertelsen, B
    Tande, T
    Sandvei, R
    Hartveit, F
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1999, 78 (01) : 54 - 59
  • [24] Association Between Positive Human Papillomavirus Status After Conization and Disease Recurrence in Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 3
    Masaki Kamio
    Shintaro Yanazume
    Shinichi Togami
    Hiroaki Kobayashi
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2021, 71 : 66 - 71
  • [25] Association Between Positive Human Papillomavirus Status After Conization and Disease Recurrence in Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 3
    Kamio, Masaki
    Yanazume, Shintaro
    Togami, Shinichi
    Kobayashi, Hiroaki
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2021, 71 (01): : 66 - 71
  • [26] Persistent intraepithelial neoplasia after excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III - Reply
    Gardeil, F
    Turner, MJ
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 90 (01): : 153 - 153
  • [27] Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3: development during pregnancy and postpartum
    Frederik A. Stuebs
    Franziska Mergel
    Martin C. Koch
    Anna K. Dietl
    Carla E. Schulmeyer
    Werner Adler
    Carol Geppert
    Arndt Hartman
    Antje Knöll
    Matthias W. Beckmann
    Paul Gass
    Grit Mehlhorn
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2023, 307 : 1567 - 1572
  • [28] Prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN-3) regression
    Munk, Ane Cecilie
    Kruse, Arnold-Jan
    van Diermen, Bianca
    Janssen, Emiel A. M.
    Skaland, Ivar
    Baak, Jan P. A.
    APMIS, 2007, 115 (11) : 1312 - 1312
  • [29] Risk Factors for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
    Armenteros Espino, Estrella de la Caridad
    Larrea Armenteros, Miriam Elenny
    Pescoso Dominguez, Suramy
    Gutierrez Castro, Rosario
    Romeu Escobar, Margarita
    FINLAY, 2016, 6 (03): : 193 - 200
  • [30] Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 in a patient following Gardasil vaccination
    McLucas, Bruce
    Vail, Eric
    Chua, Katherine Jane
    Walt, Gabriel
    BMJ CASE REPORTS, 2019, 12 (08)