Current Opinions on Fracture Follow-up: A Survey of OTA Members Regarding Standards of Care and Implications for Clinical Research

被引:15
|
作者
Ricci, William M. [1 ]
Black, James C. [1 ]
Tornetta, Paul, III [2 ]
Gardner, Michael J. [1 ]
McAndrew, Christopher M. [1 ]
Sanders, Roy W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Washington Univ Orthopaed, Campus Box 8233,660 South Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Boston, MA USA
[3] Tampa Gen Hosp, Florida Orthopaed Inst, Orthopaed Trauma Serv, Tampa, FL 33606 USA
关键词
fracture healing; survey; radiographic timing; fracture follow-up; research; ORTHOPEDIC TRAUMA ASSOCIATION; TRIALS; FIXATION; SURGEONS; PART;
D O I
10.1097/BOT.0000000000000478
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To determine current practice standards among Orthopaedic Trauma Association surgeons for postoperative fracture follow-up and to investigate the implications of these standards on clinical research. Design: Survey. Setting: Web-based survey. Participants: One hundred eighty-four orthopaedic trauma surgeons. Methods: A web-based questionnaire was distributed to Orthopaedic Trauma Association members to identify standard postoperative radiographic and clinical follow-up duration. Assuming uneventful, complete fracture healing at 3 months, data were collected for 3 generic fracture types (diaphyseal, extra-articular metaphyseal, and intra-articular) and 3 specific fractures (femoral shaft, intertrochanteric, and tibial plateau). Suggested follow-up for clinical research was also investigated. Results: For extra-articular fractures, standard radiographic and clinical follow-up were considered to be 6 months or less by greater than 70% of respondents. For intra-articular fractures, standard radiographic and clinical follow-up was considered to be 6 months or less by greater than 39% of respondents. The most common responses for radiographic follow-up were 3 months for extra-articular fractures (33%) and 12 months for intra-articular fractures (34%). The most common responses for clinical follow-up were 6 months for extra-articular fractures (37%) and 12 months for intra-articular fractures (35%). The majority (55%) indicated that follow-up to clinical and radiographic healing or the establishment of a nonunion should be the minimum follow-up for clinical fracture studies and 66% recommended follow-up to at least 1 year for functional outcome studies. Conclusions: Most surgeons follow-up patients with lower extremity extra-articular fractures (with uneventful healing) radiographically for 3-6 months and clinically for 6 months and slightly longer for intra-articular fractures. Many surgeons cease radiographic and clinical follow-up by 6 months. Therefore, retrospective fracture healing studies can only reasonably expect follow-up for 6 months. Publication requirements for longer follow-up of fracture-related studies would likely eliminated retrospective studies from consideration. Most surgeons support obtaining at least 1-year follow-up for clinical studies that include functional outcome. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:E100 / E105
页数:6
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [31] LocoMMotion: A Prospective, Observational, Multinational Study of Real-Life Current Standards of Care in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma - Final Analysis at 2-Year Follow-up
    Moreau, Philippe
    Weisel, Katja
    De Stefano, Valerio
    Goldschmidt, Hartmut
    Delforge, Michel
    Mohty, Mohamad
    Lindsey-Hill, Joanne
    Dytfeld, Dominik
    Angelucci, Emanuele
    Vincent, Laure
    Perrot, Aurore
    Benjamin, Reuben
    van de Donk, Niels
    Ocio, Enrique
    Groen-Damen, Ester In't
    Roccia, Tito
    Schecter, Jordan
    Haddad, Imene
    Strulev, Vadim
    Mitchell, Lada
    Buyze, Jozefien
    Saarinen, Silva
    Costa Filho, Octavio
    Einsele, Hermann
    Mateos, Maria-Victoria
    CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA, 2023, 23 : S500 - S501
  • [32] LocoMMotion: a prospective, observational, multinational study of real-life current standards of care in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma-final analysis at 2-year follow-up
    Weisel, Katja
    Moreau, Philippe
    De Stefano, Valerio
    Goldschmidt, Hartmut
    Delforge, Michel
    Mohty, Mohamad
    Lindsey-Hill, Joanne
    Dytfeld, Dominik
    Angelucci, Emanuele
    Vincent, Laure
    Perrot, Aurore
    Benjamin, Reuben
    van de Donk, Niels
    Ocio, Enrique
    In't Groen-Damen, Ester
    Roccia, Tito
    Schecter, Jordan
    Haddad, Imene
    Strulev, Vadim
    Mitchell, Lada
    Buyze, Jozefien
    Saarinen, Silva
    Costa Filho, Octavio
    Einsele, Hermann
    Mateos, Maria-Victoria
    CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA, 2023, 23 : S217 - S217
  • [33] LocoMMotion: a study of real-life current standards of care in triple-class exposed patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma-2-year follow-up (final analysis)
    Mateos, Maria-Victoria
    Weisel, Katja
    De Stefano, Valerio
    Goldschmidt, Hartmut
    Delforge, Michel
    Mohty, Mohamad
    Dytfeld, Dominik
    Angelucci, Emanuele
    Vincent, Laure
    Perrot, Aurore
    Benjamin, Reuben
    van de Donk, Niels W. C. J.
    Ocio, Enrique M.
    Roccia, Tito
    Schecter, Jordan M.
    Koskinen, Silva
    Haddad, Imene
    Strulev, Vadim
    Mitchell, Lada
    Buyze, Jozefien
    Filho, Octavio Costa
    Einsele, Hermann
    Moreau, Philippe
    LEUKEMIA, 2024, : 2554 - 2560
  • [34] Letter to the editor regarding "a retrospective chart analysis with 5-year follow-up of early care for geriatric hip fracture patients: why we should continue talking about hip fractures"
    Gong, Yuhan
    Wang, Xinjie
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2025, 51 (01)
  • [35] Falls are the most frequent provocative factor for subsequent clinical fractures during 1-year follow-up in patients with a recent clinicl fracture evaluated and treated according to current osteoporosis guideline at a Fracture Liaison Service
    Vranken, Lisanne
    Wyers, Caroline E.
    Van Der Velde, Robert Y.
    De Bruin, Irma Ja
    Janzing, Heinrich Mj
    Kaarsemaker, Sjoerd
    Geusens, Piet Pm
    Van Den Bergh, Joop Pw
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2018, 33 : 430 - 430
  • [36] A low-dose intradermal hepatitis B vaccine programme in health-care workers and students is highly effective and cost saving: A retrospective follow-up survey in the clinical setting
    Sangfelt, Per
    Uhnoo, Ingrid
    Reichard, Olle
    Weiland, Ola
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 43 (04) : 465 - 472
  • [37] CANDOO: A longitudinal canadian multicenter tertiary-care network for observational research in osteoporosis (OP) and osteopenia using standardized clinical practice data: 11 years of follow-up
    Adachi, JD
    Sebaldt, RJ
    Olszynski, WP
    Brown, JP
    Hanley, DA
    Josse, RG
    Murray, T
    Petrie, A
    Ioannidis, G
    Goldsmith, CH
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 13 : S28 - S28
  • [38] CANDOO: A longitudinal Canadian multi-center tertiary-care network for observational research in osteoporosis and osteopenia using standardized clinical practice data: 11 years of follow-up
    Sebaldt, RJ
    Adachi, JD
    Olszynski, W
    Brown, JP
    Hanley, DA
    Josse, RG
    Murray, T
    Stephenson, GF
    Petrie, A
    Mark, A
    Goldsmith, CH
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2002, 17 : S358 - S358
  • [39] Practical Applications and Observational Implications of Time-Based Coding for Workers' Compensation Clinical Encounters-A Follow-up to Best Practices in Documenting and Coding High-Value Care in Workers' Compensation Encounters-ACOEM Guidance Statement
    Martin, Douglas W.
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2024, 66 (07) : e321 - e322
  • [40] Answer to letter to the editor regarding “A retrospective chart analysis with 5-year follow-up of early care for geriatric hip fracture patients: why we should continue talking about hip fractures.”Answer to letter to the editorA. Sermon et al.
    An Sermon
    Harm Hoekstra
    European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 2025, 51 (1)