Comparative analysis of existing food safety culture evaluation systems

被引:26
|
作者
Jespersen, Lone [1 ]
Griffiths, Mansel [1 ]
Wallace, Carol A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, 50 Stone Rd East, Guelph, ON N1G 2M7, Canada
[2] Univ Cent Lancashire, Int Inst Nutrit Sci & Appl Food Safety Studies, Preston PR1 2HE, Lancs, England
关键词
Food safety culture; Research quality; Trustworthiness; Cultural dimensions; Culture evaluation; IMPLEMENTATION; QUALITY; WORKERS; CLIMATE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.03.037
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The purpose of the research was firstly, to analyze existing culture evaluation systems for commonalities and differences in research quality, applied validation strategies, and content. Secondly, to suggest a simple structure of food safety cultural dimensions to help unify the culture evaluation field. To achieve these goals, a comparison of eight culture evaluation models applied to varing degrees in the food industry was conducted. The systems were found to vary significantly in applied validation strategies but through deductive, textual data analysis, five dimensions were identified that cover elements present in all the models. Transparency is needed when using applied research methodologies to continually increase quality and trustworthiness of culture research in the food safety domain and this field would benefit from both further commonality of approach to validation strategy and structure and adoption of art overarching structural framework. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 379
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Existing Food Habits and Recent Choices Lead to Disregard of Food Safety Announcements
    Cao, Ying
    Just, David R.
    Turvey, Calum
    Wansink, Brian
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D AGROECONOMIE, 2015, 63 (04): : 491 - 511
  • [32] Safety evaluation for foundations of existing railway bridges
    Zhan, JW
    Xia, H
    PROGRESS IN SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL 4, PTS A AND B, 2004, 4 : 1952 - 1958
  • [34] Food safety performance indicators to benchmark food safety output of food safety management systems
    Jacxsens, L.
    Uyttendaele, M.
    Devlieghere, F.
    Rovira, J.
    Oses Gomez, S.
    Luning, P. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 141 : S180 - S187
  • [35] Application of Factor Restructuring Analysis in Enterprise Safety Culture Evaluation
    Wang, Yihong
    Xia, Liming
    Pan, Jinshuang
    Zong, Hengheng
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED PHYSICS AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING 2012, PT C, 2012, 24 : 1642 - 1648
  • [36] ADMINISTRATIVE PERCEPTIONS OF EXISTING EVALUATION SYSTEMS
    ANDREWS, HA
    LICATA, CM
    JOURNAL OF PERSONNEL EVALUATION IN EDUCATION, 1991, 5 (01): : 69 - 76
  • [37] Modification of the existing MRL for fenhexamid in onionsEuropean Food Safety Authority
    European Food Safety Authority
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2010, 8 (07)
  • [38] Comparative analysis of existing disinfection models
    Andrianarison, T.
    Jupsin, H.
    Ouali, A.
    Vasel, J-L
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 61 (04) : 955 - 962
  • [39] Triangulation: Effective verification of food safety and quality management systems and associated organisational culture
    Manning, Louise
    WORLDWIDE HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM THEMES, 2018, 10 (03) : 297 - 312
  • [40] Local Food Systems Food Safety Concerns
    Chapman, Benjamin
    Gunter, Chris
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2018, 6 (02):