Effect of b values and size of region of interest on apparent diffusion coefficient measurement and its reproducibility in liver diffusion-weighted MRI

被引:1
|
作者
Huang, Yucun [1 ]
Xie, Liling [1 ]
Cao, Zhi [1 ]
Lu, Shaofan [1 ]
Huang, Shengfu [1 ]
机构
[1] Fifth Peoples Hosp Zhuhai, Dept Radiol, Zhuhai, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Liver diffusion-weighted imaging; Apparent diffusion coefficient; b values; Region of interest; Reproducibility; ADC MEASUREMENTS; BREATH-HOLD; CHRONIC HEPATITIS; DIAGNOSIS; PERFUSION; FIBROSIS; AGREEMENT; LESIONS; TESLA;
D O I
10.1007/s42058-021-00053-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo investigate the effect of b value and size of region of interest (ROI) on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement and its reproducibility in liver diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).MethodsThirty-six volunteers underwent liver DWI twice with b values of 0, 100, 500, and 800 s/mm(2). ADCs were measured with ROI of 50 mm(2) on ADC maps generated with different b values of (0, 100), (0, 500), (0, 800), (0, 100, 500), (0, 100, 800), (0, 500, 800), and (0, 100, 500, 800) s/mm(2). ADCs from b values of (0, 800) s/mm(2) were measured with 4 ROI sizes (50, 100, 200 and 300 mm(2)). ANOVA analysis was used to compare differences of ADCs among different ROI sizes and different combined b values. Bland-Altman method was used to assess reproducibility of ADC measurement.ResultsADCs with larger ROI size were slightly higher than those with smaller one, while no statistical difference was found (P > 0.05). And reproducibility of ADC measurement with different ROI sizes was comparable (LOA 7.0-8.2% for right lobe, 14.15-17.4% for left lobe). ADCs statistically decreased with increased maximum b values (P < 0.05). ADC measurement achieved the best reproducible with maximum b value of 800 s/mm(2) regardless of the number of b values.ConclusionsThe b values influence ADC measurement and its reproducibility, while the ROI sizes do not affect them. Two b values of (0, 800) s/mm(2) and ROI of 50 mm(2) are recommended for liver ADC measurement.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 62
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Apparent diffusion coefficient normalization of normal liver Will it improve the reproducibility of diffusion-weighted imaging at different MR scanners as a new biomarker?
    Zhu, Jie
    Zhang, Jie
    Gao, Jia-Yin
    Li, Jin-Ning
    Yang, Da-Wei
    Chen, Min
    Zhou, Cheng
    Yang, Zheng-Han
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (03)
  • [42] Does reversal of ischemia on diffusion-weighted imaging reflect higher apparent diffusion coefficient values?
    Lutsep, HL
    Nesbit, GM
    Berger, RM
    Coshow, WR
    JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, 2001, 11 (03) : 313 - 316
  • [43] Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Reproducibility of the Pancreas Measured at Different MR Scanners Using Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
    Ye, Xiao-Hua
    Gao, Jia-Yin
    Yang, Zheng-Han
    Liu, Yuan
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2014, 40 (06) : 1375 - 1381
  • [44] Improved differentiation between hepatic hemangioma and metastases on diffusion-weighted MRI by measurement of standard deviation of apparent diffusion coefficient
    Hardie, Andrew D.
    Egbert, Robert E.
    Rissing, Michael S.
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2015, 39 (04) : 654 - 658
  • [45] Fetal lung apparent diffusion coefficient measurement using diffusion-weighted MRI at 3 Tesla: Correlation with gestational age
    Afacan, Onur
    Gholipour, Ali
    Mulkern, Robert V.
    Barnewolt, Carol E.
    Estroff, Judy A.
    Connolly, Susan A.
    Parad, Richard B.
    Bairdain, Sigrid
    Warfield, Simon K.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 44 (06) : 1650 - 1655
  • [46] Differential diagnosis of the small renal masses: role of the apparent diffusion coefficient of the diffusion-weighted MRI
    Mytsyk, Yulian
    Dutka, Ihor
    Yuriy, Borys
    Maksymovych, Iryna
    Caprnda, Martin
    Gazdikova, Katarina
    Rodrigo, Luis
    Kruzliak, Peter
    Illjuk, Polina
    Farooqi, Ammad Ahmad
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2018, 50 (02) : 197 - 204
  • [47] Diffusion-weighted MRI in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Response Marker
    Winfield, Jessica M.
    Wakefield, Jennifer C.
    Dolling, David
    Hall, Marcia
    Freeman, Susan
    Brenton, James D.
    Lutchman-Singh, Kerryn
    Pace, Erika
    Priest, Andrew N.
    Quest, Rebecca A.
    Taylor, N. Jane
    Gabra, Hani
    McKnight, Liam
    Collins, David J.
    Banerjee, Susana
    Hall, Emma
    Desouza, Nandita M.
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 293 (02) : 374 - 383
  • [48] Differential diagnosis of the small renal masses: role of the apparent diffusion coefficient of the diffusion-weighted MRI
    Yulian Mytsyk
    Ihor Dutka
    Borys Yuriy
    Iryna Maksymovych
    Martin Caprnda
    Katarina Gazdikova
    Luis Rodrigo
    Peter Kruzliak
    Polina Illjuk
    Ammad Ahmad Farooqi
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2018, 50 : 197 - 204
  • [49] Evaluation of malignancy in gallbladder tumors using the apparent diffusion coefficient obtained by diffusion-weighted MRI
    Yamada, Shinichiro
    Morine, Yuji
    Ikemoto, Tetsuya
    Saito, Yu
    Teraoku, Hiroki
    Waki, Yuhei
    Nakasu, Chiharu
    Noma, Takayuki
    Shimada, Mitsuo
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2024, 28 (05)
  • [50] Reply to the letter to the editor: Importance of different region-of-interest protocols for the apparent diffusion coefficient measurement of tumors in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
    Mukuda, Naoko
    Fujii, Shinya
    Ogawa, Toshihide
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 44 (05) : 1370 - 1370