The Glasgow Coma Scale

被引:170
|
作者
Sternbach, GL [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Stanford, CA USA
来源
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE | 2000年 / 19卷 / 01期
关键词
coma; head injury;
D O I
10.1016/S0736-4679(00)00182-7
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Teasdale and Jennett first presented the Glasgow Coma Scale in 1974 as an aid in the clinical assessment of unconsciousness. It was devised as a formal scheme to overcome the ambiguities and misunderstandings that arose when information about comatose patients was presented and groups of patients were compared. Since then, the Glasgow Coma Scale has been used extensively, being used to grade individual patients, compare effectiveness of treatments, and as a prognostic indicator. It has been incorporated into numerous trauma and critical illness classification systems. However, a number of competing scales have been developed to overcome its perceived deficiencies. These scales are generally more complex. One of the expressed reservations regarding the Glasgow Coma Scale has been its failure to incorporate brainstem reflexes. The scale also includes a numerical skew toward the motor response. An important current issue is the appropriate application of the Glasgow Coma Scale to intubated patients. A number of approaches have been used to assign the verbal score to such patients. The timing of initial scoring is another area of discussion. Despite its drawbacks, the Glasgow Coma Scale remains the most universally utilized level of consciousness scale worldwide. It seems destined to be used in emergency medicine for some time. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 71
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evidence-based improvement of the National Trauma Triage Protocol: The Glasgow Coma Scale versus Glasgow Coma Scale motor subscale
    Brown, Joshua B.
    Forsythe, Raquel M.
    Stassen, Nicole A.
    Peitzman, Andrew B.
    Billiar, Timothy R.
    Sperry, Jason L.
    Gestring, Mark L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2014, 77 (01): : 95 - 101
  • [42] Predictive Utility of the Total Glasgow Coma Scale Versus the Motor Component of the Glasgow Coma Scale for Identification of Patients With Serious Traumatic Injuries
    Chou, Roger
    Totten, Annette M.
    Carney, Nancy
    Dandy, Spencer
    Fu, Rongwei
    Grusing, Sara
    Pappas, Miranda
    Wasson, Ngoc
    Newgard, Craig D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 70 (02) : 143 - 157
  • [43] The Glasgow Coma Scale: 50-year anniversary
    Aguilar-Fuentes, Victor
    Orozco-Puga, Patricia
    Jimenez-Ruiz, Amado
    [J]. NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 45 (06) : 2899 - 2901
  • [44] Modification of Glasgow Coma Scale Criteria for Injured Elders
    Caterino, Jeffrey M.
    Raubenolt, Amy
    Cudnik, Michael T.
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 18 (10) : 1014 - 1021
  • [46] Full outline of unresponsiveness (four) compared to Glasgow Coma scale assessment in coma
    Bruno, M. -A.
    Ledoux, D.
    Damas, F.
    Schnakers, C.
    Choi, P.
    Jonlet, S.
    Lambermont, B.
    Moonen, G.
    Laureys, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2009, 256 : S40 - S40
  • [47] Full Outline of Unresponsiveness score and the Glasgow Coma Scale in prediction of pediatric coma
    Jamal, Atahar
    Sankhyan, Naveen
    Jayashree, Murlidharan
    Singhi, Sunit
    Singhi, Pratibha
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 8 (01) : 55 - 60
  • [48] Full Outline of Unresponsiveness score and the Glasgow Coma Scale in prediction of pediatric coma
    Atahar Jamal
    Naveen Sankhyan
    Murlidharan Jayashree
    Sunit Singhi
    Pratibha Singhi
    [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2017, (01) : 55 - 60
  • [49] Full Outline of Unresponsiveness score and the Glasgow Coma Scale in prediction of pediatric coma
    Atahar Jamal
    Naveen Sankhyan
    Murlidharan Jayashree
    Sunit Singhi
    Pratibha Singhi
    [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2017, 8 (01) : 55 - 60
  • [50] Relation between Glasgow Coma Scale and aspiration pneumonia
    Adnet, F
    Baud, F
    [J]. LANCET, 1996, 348 (9020): : 123 - 124