Extracorporeal life support for cardiogenic shock during pregnancy and postpartum: a single center experience

被引:3
|
作者
Desai, Mehul [1 ]
Osborn, Erik [1 ]
King, Christopher [2 ]
Shlobin, Oksana A. [2 ]
Psotka, Mitchell [3 ]
Ryan, Liam [4 ]
Javid Akhtar, Saba [4 ]
Singh, Ramesh [4 ]
机构
[1] INOVA Fairfax Hosp, Dept Med, Med Crit Care Serv, 3300 Gallows Rd, Falls Church, VA 22042 USA
[2] INOVA Fairfax Hosp, Adv Lung Dis, Falls Church, VA USA
[3] INOVA Fairfax Hosp, Adv Heart Failure, Falls Church, VA USA
[4] INOVA Fairfax Hosp, INOVA Cardiac & Thorac Surg, Falls Church, VA USA
来源
PERFUSION-UK | 2022年 / 37卷 / 05期
关键词
cardiogenic shock; peripartum cardiomyopathy; extracorporeal support; VA ECMO;
D O I
10.1177/02676591211004369
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) for cardiogenic shock in pregnant and postpartum patients remains limited by concerns of bleeding, hemolysis, and fetal risks. This case series examines the underlying characteristics and management strategies for this high-risk population. Methods: All pregnant and post-partum patients who underwent VA ECMO in the cardiovascular intensive care unit between January 1, 2016 and November 1, 2019, were included in this retrospective study. Management of maternal and fetal O-2 delivery, left ventricular (LV) unloading, anticoagulation, and ECMO circuit characteristics were evaluated. Results: Five patients required veno-arterial ECMO for restoration of systemic perfusion. Three patients developed peripartum cardiomyopathy, one septic cardiomyopathy, and one acute right ventricular (RV) failure. The median age was 30.6 years, with median gestational age in pregnant patients of 31 weeks. Maternal and fetal survival to discharge was 80%. Bleeding was the primary complication, with two patients requiring blood transfusions; one requiring interventional radiology (IR) embolization and the other requiring surgical intervention to control bleeding. One patient was successfully delivered on VA ECMO. No fetal complications were directly attributed to VA ECMO. Conclusions: VA ECMO can be employed successfully in obstetric patients with cardiogenic shock with appropriate patient selection. Further research is needed to determine if VA ECMO provides a survival advantage over traditional management strategies in this vulnerable population.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 498
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Outcomes after peripheral extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock: a single-center experience
    Slottosch, Ingo
    Liakopoulos, Oliver
    Kuhn, Elmar
    Deppe, Antje-Christin
    Scherner, Maximilian
    Madershahian, Navid
    Choi, Yeong-Hoon
    Wahlers, Thorsten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2013, 181 (02) : E47 - E55
  • [42] “Awake Veno-arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation” in Pediatric Cardiogenic Shock: A Single-Center Experience
    F. Schmidt
    T. Jack
    M. Sasse
    T. Kaussen
    H. Bertram
    A. Horke
    K. Seidemann
    P. Beerbaum
    H. Koeditz
    [J]. Pediatric Cardiology, 2015, 36 : 1647 - 1656
  • [43] Extracorporeal life support for post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock: a systematic review
    Charlesworth, M.
    Venkateswaran, R.
    Barnard, J.
    Barker, J.
    Feddy, L.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 72 : 32 - 32
  • [44] Extracorporeal life support in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock: keep them awake
    Mohite, Prashant N.
    Kaul, Sundeep
    Sabashnikov, Anton
    Rashid, Naufal
    Fatullayev, Javid
    Zych, Bartlomiej
    Popov, Aron-Frederik
    Maunz, Olaf
    Patil, Nikhil P.
    Garcia-Saez, Diana
    DeRobertis, Fabio
    Bahrami, Toufan
    Amrani, Mohamed
    Banner, Nicholas R.
    Simon, Andre R.
    [J]. INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 20 (06) : 755 - 760
  • [45] Outcomes of 576 patients with extracorporeal life support for the treatment of perioperative cardiogenic shock
    Aboud, Anas
    Hueting, Felix
    Fujita, Buntaro
    Zittermann, Armin
    Al-Khalil, Riad
    Puehler, Thomas
    Ensminger, Stephan
    Gummert, Jan
    [J]. INTERDISCIPLINARY CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2024, 39 (03):
  • [46] Extracorporeal Life Support in Patients with Primary Cardiogenic Shock: Predictors of Recovery and Survival
    Tarzia, V.
    Bagozzi, L.
    Bortolussi, G.
    Bellanti, E.
    Zanella, F.
    Bianco, R.
    Guglielmi, C.
    Testolin, L.
    Bottio, T.
    Gerosa, G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 37 (04): : S265 - S266
  • [47] Outcomes following successful decannulation from extracorporeal life support for cardiogenic shock
    Zhang, Ashley
    Kurlansky, Paul
    Ning, Yuming
    Wang, Amy
    Kaku, Yuji
    Fried, Justin
    Takeda, Koji
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 167 (03):
  • [48] Extracorporeal life support for phaeochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock: a systematic review
    Matteucci, Matteo
    Kowalewski, Mariusz
    Fina, Dario
    Jiritano, Federica
    Meani, Paolo
    Raffa, Giuseppe M.
    Aldobayyan, Ibrahim
    Beghi, Cesare
    Maessen, Jos
    Lorusso, Roberto
    [J]. PERFUSION-UK, 2020, 35 : 20 - 28
  • [49] Efficacy of central extracorporeal life support for patients with fulminant myocarditis and cardiogenic shock
    Tadokoro, Naoki
    Fukushima, Satsuki
    Minami, Kimito
    Taguchi, Takura
    Saito, Tetsuya
    Kawamoto, Naonori
    Kakuta, Takashi
    Seguchi, Osamu
    Watanabe, Takuya
    Doi, Seiko Nakajima
    Kuroda, Kensuke
    Suzuki, Keisuke
    Yanase, Masanobu
    Asaumi, Yasuhide
    Shimizu, Hideyuki
    Fukushima, Norihide
    Fujita, Tomoyuki
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 60 (05) : 1184 - 1192
  • [50] Outcome of elderly patients undergoing extracorporeal life support in refractory cardiogenic shock
    De Waha, S.
    Fuernau, G.
    Graf, T.
    Eitel, I.
    Desch, S.
    Wiedau, A.
    Lurz, P.
    Schuler, G.
    Thiele, H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 37 : 601 - 601