Extracorporeal life support for cardiogenic shock during pregnancy and postpartum: a single center experience

被引:3
|
作者
Desai, Mehul [1 ]
Osborn, Erik [1 ]
King, Christopher [2 ]
Shlobin, Oksana A. [2 ]
Psotka, Mitchell [3 ]
Ryan, Liam [4 ]
Javid Akhtar, Saba [4 ]
Singh, Ramesh [4 ]
机构
[1] INOVA Fairfax Hosp, Dept Med, Med Crit Care Serv, 3300 Gallows Rd, Falls Church, VA 22042 USA
[2] INOVA Fairfax Hosp, Adv Lung Dis, Falls Church, VA USA
[3] INOVA Fairfax Hosp, Adv Heart Failure, Falls Church, VA USA
[4] INOVA Fairfax Hosp, INOVA Cardiac & Thorac Surg, Falls Church, VA USA
来源
PERFUSION-UK | 2022年 / 37卷 / 05期
关键词
cardiogenic shock; peripartum cardiomyopathy; extracorporeal support; VA ECMO;
D O I
10.1177/02676591211004369
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) for cardiogenic shock in pregnant and postpartum patients remains limited by concerns of bleeding, hemolysis, and fetal risks. This case series examines the underlying characteristics and management strategies for this high-risk population. Methods: All pregnant and post-partum patients who underwent VA ECMO in the cardiovascular intensive care unit between January 1, 2016 and November 1, 2019, were included in this retrospective study. Management of maternal and fetal O-2 delivery, left ventricular (LV) unloading, anticoagulation, and ECMO circuit characteristics were evaluated. Results: Five patients required veno-arterial ECMO for restoration of systemic perfusion. Three patients developed peripartum cardiomyopathy, one septic cardiomyopathy, and one acute right ventricular (RV) failure. The median age was 30.6 years, with median gestational age in pregnant patients of 31 weeks. Maternal and fetal survival to discharge was 80%. Bleeding was the primary complication, with two patients requiring blood transfusions; one requiring interventional radiology (IR) embolization and the other requiring surgical intervention to control bleeding. One patient was successfully delivered on VA ECMO. No fetal complications were directly attributed to VA ECMO. Conclusions: VA ECMO can be employed successfully in obstetric patients with cardiogenic shock with appropriate patient selection. Further research is needed to determine if VA ECMO provides a survival advantage over traditional management strategies in this vulnerable population.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 498
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Extracorporeal Life Support for Cardiogenic Shock in Octogenarians: Single Center Experience
    Scupakova, Nadezda
    Urbonas, Karolis
    Jankuviene, Agne
    Puodziukaite, Lina
    Andrijauskas, Povilas
    Janusauskas, Vilius
    Zorinas, Aleksejus
    Laurusonis, Kestutis
    Serpytis, Pranas
    Samalavicius, Robertas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (02)
  • [2] The place of extracorporeal life support in cardiogenic shock
    Pineton de Chambrun, Marc
    Brechot, Nicolas
    Combes, Alain
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 26 (04) : 424 - 431
  • [3] Biventricular support in patients with profound cardiogenic shock: A single center experience
    Magliato, KE
    Kleisli, T
    Soukiasian, HJ
    Tabrizi, R
    Coleman, B
    Hickey, A
    Czer, LSC
    Blanche, C
    Cheng, W
    Fontana, GP
    Kass, RM
    Raissi, SS
    Trento, A
    [J]. ASAIO JOURNAL, 2003, 49 (04) : 475 - 479
  • [4] Central venoarterial extracorporeal life support in pediatric refractory septic shock: a single center experience
    Ruth, Amanda
    Vogel, Adam M.
    Adachi, Iki
    Shekerdemian, Lara S.
    Bastero, Patricia
    Thomas, James A.
    [J]. PERFUSION-UK, 2022, 37 (04): : 385 - 393
  • [5] Extracorporeal Life Support in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock
    Thiele, Holger
    Zeymer, Uwe
    Akin, Ibrahim
    Behnes, Michael
    Rassaf, Tienush
    Mahabadi, Amir Abbas
    Lehmann, Ralf
    Eitel, Ingo
    Graf, Tobias
    Seidler, Tim
    Schuster, Andreas
    Skurk, Carsten
    Duerschmied, Daniel
    Clemmensen, Peter
    Hennersdorf, Marcus
    Fichtlscherer, Stephan
    Voigt, Ingo
    Seyfarth, Melchior
    John, Stefan
    Ewen, Sebastian
    Linke, Axel
    Tigges, Eike
    Nordbeck, Peter
    Bruch, Leonhard
    Jung, Christian
    Franz, Jutta
    Lauten, Philipp
    Goslar, Tomaz
    Feistritzer, Hans-Josef
    Poess, Janine
    Kirchhof, Eva
    Ouarrak, Taoufik
    Schneider, Steffen
    Desch, Steffen
    Freund, Anne
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2023, 389 (14): : 1286 - 1297
  • [6] Phaeochromocytoma revealed by a cardiogenic shock treated by extracorporeal life support
    Contargyris, C.
    Nee, L.
    Saby, C.
    Kerbaul, F.
    Peytel, E.
    [J]. ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION, 2012, 31 (12): : 965 - 968
  • [7] Modern Use of Extracorporeal Life Support in Pregnancy and Postpartum
    Sharma, Nirmal S.
    Wille, Keith M.
    Bellot, Scott C.
    Diaz-Guzman, Enrique
    [J]. ASAIO JOURNAL, 2015, 61 (01) : 110 - 114
  • [8] Extracorporeal Life Support in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock
    Bardy, Theo
    Didier, Clemence
    Mongardon, Nicolas
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2024, 390 (02): : 189 - 191
  • [9] Outcomes after extracorporeal life support for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock
    Pozzi, Matteo
    Alvau, Francesca
    Armoiry, Xavier
    Grinberg, Daniel
    Hugon-Vallet, Elisabeth
    Koffel, Catherine
    Portran, Philippe
    Scollo, Giovanni
    Fellahi, Jean Luc
    Obadia, Jean Francois
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2019, 34 (02) : 74 - 81
  • [10] Awake Implementation of Extracorporeal Life Support in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock
    Riebandt, Julia
    Haberl, Thomas
    Distelmaier, Klaus
    Bernardi, Martin H.
    Schaefer, Anne-Kristin
    Laufer, Guenther
    Zimpfer, Daniel
    Wiedemann, Dominik
    [J]. MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2022, 58 (01):