Palliative Care in the Greater China Region: A Systematic Review of Needs, Models, and Outcomes

被引:25
|
作者
Chung, Huei [1 ]
Harding, Richard [2 ]
Guo, Ping [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Taipei City Hosp, Dept Pharm, Zhongxiao Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Kings Coll London, Florence Nightingale Fac Nursing Midwifery & Pall, Cicely Saunders Inst Palliat Care Policy & Rehabi, London, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Sch Nursing, Inst Clin Sci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
关键词
Palliative care needs; interventions; outcomes; Greater China; systematic review; ILL CANCER-PATIENTS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PATIENTS LAST YEAR; TERMINALLY-ILL; HONG-KONG; FAMILY CAREGIVERS; PAIN MANAGEMENT; DEATH; PREFERENCES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.08.040
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context. There is rapidly increasing need for palliative care in Greater China because of rapidly aging populations. Objectives. This study aimed to systematically review and appraise evidence for palliative care needs, models of care, interventions, and outcomes in Greater China. Methods. Four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO) were searched, with hand searching of local journals and databases. Narrative synthesis was applied to the qualitative and quantitative evidence. Results. Nineteen qualitative studies and 47 quantitative studies were retained. With respect to care needs, nine themes were synthesized: pain control, reduced aggressive end-of-life care, truth telling, physical, emotional, and spiritual supports, and achieving preferred place of care/death. Informal caregivers expressed their needs for education and burden reduction. Health care professionals called for training and national policy support. Twenty-four studies evaluated interventions, mostly among patients with advanced cancer. Positive effects were suggested for improvements in quality of life, pain, anxiety and depression, readmission rate, and costs. Models of care evaluated were mostly specialist palliative care delivered in various settings (hospitals, residential care, and home). Outcome measures used were grouped into six categories of construct: quality of life, pain, physical assessment, psychospiritual assessment, quality of care, and implementation assessment. Limited rigorous randomized controlled trials are available to document intervention outcomes, and some problems (such as high attrition rates) reduced the strength of the evidence. Conclusion. Palliative care services within Greater China should pay more attention to management of nonmalignant disease and to integration into primary services. Policy support is key to establishing culturally appropriate person-centered services. (C) 2020 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 612
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Status of palliative care education in Mainland China: A systematic review
    Willemsen, Antonia M.
    Mason, Stephen
    Zhang, Silja
    Elsner, Frank
    [J]. PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2021, 19 (02) : 235 - 245
  • [22] Virtual models of care for people with palliative care needs living in their own home: A systematic meta-review and narrative synthesis
    Disalvo, Domenica
    Agar, Meera
    Caplan, Gideon
    Murtagh, Fliss E. M.
    Luckett, Tim
    Heneka, Nicole
    Hickman, Louise
    Kinchin, Irina
    Trethewie, Susan
    Sheehan, Caitlin
    Urban, Kat
    Cohen, Joshua
    Harlum, Janeane
    Long, Brian
    Parker, Tricia
    Schaefer, Isabelle
    Phillips, Jane
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 35 (08) : 1385 - 1406
  • [23] Effectiveness of eHealth Interventions and Information Needs in Palliative Care: A Systematic Literature Review
    Capurro, Daniel
    Ganzinger, Matthias
    Perez-Lu, Jose
    Knaup, Petra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (03) : 68 - 77
  • [24] The effectiveness of aromatherapy, massage and reflexology in people with palliative care needs: A systematic review
    Candy, Bridget
    Armstrong, Megan
    Flemming, Kate
    Kupeli, Nuriye
    Stone, Patrick
    Vickerstaff, Victoria
    Wilkinson, Susie
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 34 (02) : 179 - 194
  • [25] What defines the comprehensive assessment of needs in palliative care? An integrative systematic review
    Goni-Fuste, Blanca
    Crespo, Iris
    Monforte-Royo, Cristina
    Porta-Sales, Josep
    Balaguer, Albert
    Pergolizzi, Denise
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 35 (04) : 651 - 669
  • [26] Validated medication deprescribing instruments for patients with palliative care needs: a systematic review
    de Andrade, Frangie Kallas
    Nunes, Raziel Prado Ignacio
    Zanetti, Maria Olivia Barboza
    Zanetti, Ariane Cristina Barboza
    dos Santos, Marcia
    Oliveira, Alan Maicon de
    Carson-Stevens, Andrew
    Pereira, Leonardo Regis Leira
    Varallo, Fabiana Rossi
    [J]. FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA, 2024, 48 (02) : 83 - 89
  • [27] Knowledge and information needs of informal caregivers in palliative care: a qualitative systematic review
    Docherty, Andrea
    Owens, Alastair
    Asadi-Lari, Mohsen
    Petchey, Roland
    Williams, Jacky
    Carter, Yvonne H.
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 22 (02) : 153 - 171
  • [28] Identification of patients with potential palliative care needs: A systematic review of screening tools in primary care
    ElMokhallalati, Yousuf
    Bradley, Stephen H.
    Chapman, Emma
    Ziegler, Lucy
    Murtagh, Fliss E. M.
    Johnson, Miriam J.
    Bennett, Michael, I
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 34 (08) : 989 - 1005
  • [29] Telehealth in Palliative Care A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Head, Barbara A.
    Schapmire, Tara J.
    Zheng, Yongqiang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE NURSING, 2017, 19 (02) : 130 - 139
  • [30] A Systematic Review of Nursing Home Palliative Care Interventions: Characteristics and Outcomes
    Carpenter, Joan G.
    Lam, Karissa
    Ritter, Ashley Z.
    Ersek, Mary
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 21 (05) : 583 - +