Optimizing the spinning reserve requirements using a cost/benefit analysis

被引:169
|
作者
Ortega-Vazquez, Miguel A. [1 ]
Kirschen, Daniel S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Elect & Elect Engn, Manchester M60 1QD, Lancs, England
关键词
expected energy not served (EENS); loss-of-load probability (LOLP); mixed integer programming (MIP); power generation dispatch; power generation scheduling; spinning reserve (SR); value of lost load (VOLL);
D O I
10.1109/TPWRS.2006.888951
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Spinning reserve (SR) is one of the most important resources used by system operators to respond to unforeseen events such as generation outages and sudden load changes. While keeping large amounts of generation in reserve protects the power system against the generation deficits that might arise from different contingencies, and thus reduces the probability of having to resort to load shedding, this reserve provision is costly. Traditional unit commitment (UC) formulations use deterministic criteria, such as the capacity of the largest online generator to set the SR requirements. Other UC formulations adjust this requirement based on probabilistic criteria but require iterative processes or approximate calculations of the level of risk associated with the provision of reserve. This paper describes an offline method for setting the SR requirements based on the cost of its provision and the benefit derived from its availability.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:24 / 33
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Estimating the Spinning Reserve Requirements in Systems With Significant Wind Power Generation Penetration
    Ortega-Vazquez, Miguel A.
    Kirschen, Daniel S.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2009, 24 (01) : 114 - 124
  • [42] Integer modelling of spinning reserve requirements in short term scheduling of hydro systems
    Nilsson, O
    Soder, L
    Sjelvgren, D
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1998, 13 (03) : 959 - 964
  • [43] Price-based adaptive spinning reserve requirements in power system scheduling
    Tseng, CL
    Oren, SS
    Svoboda, AJ
    Johnson, RB
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 1999, 21 (02) : 137 - 145
  • [44] Optimizing Observing Systems Using ASPEN: An Analysis Tool to Assess the Benefit and Cost Effectiveness of Observations to Earth System Applications
    Boukabara, Sid-Ahmed
    Hoffman, Ross N.
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2022, 103 (10) : E2417 - E2439
  • [45] Cost-benefit Analysis of Using Heuristics in ACGP
    Aleshunas, John
    Janikow, Cezary
    2011 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2011, : 1172 - 1178
  • [46] Usability Cost Benefit Analysis Using a Mathematical Equation
    Rajper, Samina
    Shaikh, Abdul Wahid
    Shaikh, Zubair A.
    Amin, Imran
    EMERGING TRENDS AND APPLICATIONS IN INFORMATION COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2012, 281 : 349 - +
  • [47] Using NCCI rating worksheet in cost/benefit analysis
    Vaidya, SC
    Weeks, AL
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2001, : 244 - 250
  • [48] Cost-benefit analysis using CVM for IT investments
    Kaneda, S
    Ishitani, S
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2000, 62 : 211 - 218
  • [49] Cost–benefit analysis
    Grant Miura
    Nature Chemical Biology, 2018, 14 : 903 - 903
  • [50] COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    PRYNN, PJ
    CHEMISTRY & INDUSTRY, 1970, (01) : 9 - &