Comparison of five systems for staging lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Yu, W [1 ]
Choi, GS [1 ]
Whang, I [1 ]
Suh, IS [1 ]
机构
[1] KYUNGPOOK NATL UNIV HOSP,DEPT PATHOL,TAEGU 700721,SOUTH KOREA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background There are several systems for staging lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer. Their relative merits are not clear. Methods In this retrospective analysis, the nodal status was classified according to the Union Internacional Contra la Cancrum (UICC) and Japanese staging systems, the number and frequency of lymph node metastasis, and the level of involved nodes. Each staging system was scored as good (+1), fair (0) or poor (-1) with respect to prognostic value, theoretical value, convenience, reproducibility and surgical applicability. Results There were no differences between the five staging systems in predicting survival. The Japanese staging system was most arbitrary owing to the complexity of the system, although it had an advantage in surgical application. The same disadvantage was found in the UICC system and the level system. Determination of the number and frequency of involved nodes was convenient and reproducible, but the number of lymph nodes dissected must be considered when the number of positive nodes is used for staging. Conclusion The classification of metastasis to the regional lymph nodes as N-0, (no nodal metastasis), N-1 (metastasis in 1-25 per cent of dissected nodes) and N-2 (metastasis in more than 25 per cent of dissected nodes) would be a simple, convenient, reproducible staging system with an ability to predict surgical results.
引用
收藏
页码:1305 / 1309
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Solitary Lymph Node Metastasis in Gastric Cancer
    Chen Li
    Sungsoo Kim
    Ji Fu Lai
    Sung Jin Oh
    Woo Jin Hyung
    Won Hyuk Choi
    Seung Ho Choi
    Sung Hoon Noh
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2008, 12 : 550 - 554
  • [22] Early Gastric Cancer with Lymph Node Metastasis
    Narumiya, Kosuke
    Oguma, Hidetoshi
    Yamamoto, Masakazu
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2011, 253 (04) : 840 - 841
  • [23] Prognostic value of lymph node staging in gastric cancer
    Ichikawa, D
    Kurioka, H
    Ueshima, Y
    Shirono, K
    Kan, K
    Shioaki, Y
    Lee, CJ
    Hamashima, T
    Deguchi, E
    Ikeda, E
    Mutoh, F
    Yamagishi, H
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 50 (49) : 301 - 304
  • [24] The Lymph Node Ratio Staging System in Gastric Cancer
    Da-zhi Xu
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2010, 17 : 659 - 659
  • [25] The Lymph Node Ratio Staging System in Gastric Cancer
    Xu, Da-zhi
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (02) : 659 - 659
  • [26] Sentinel lymph node concept in gastric cancer with solitary lymph node metastasis
    Cheng, Li-Yang
    Zhong, Shi-Zhen
    Huang, Zong-Hai
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 10 (20) : 3053 - 3055
  • [27] Sentinel lymph node concept in gastric cancer with solitary lymph node metastasis
    Li-Yang Cheng Shi-Zhen Zhong Zong-Hai Huang Institute of Clinical Anatomy
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2004, (20) : 3053 - 3055
  • [28] Correlations of TNM staging and lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer with MRI features and VEGF expression
    Pang, Lan
    Wang, Jing
    Fan, Yong
    Xu, Rui
    Bai, Yuping
    Bai, Liangcai
    CANCER BIOMARKERS, 2018, 23 (01) : 53 - 59
  • [29] Role of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer with nonbulky lymph node metastasis: Comparison of comprehensive surgical staging and sentinel lymph node algorithm
    Multinu, Francesco
    Ducie, Jennifer A.
    Eriksson, Ane Gerda Zahl
    Schlappe, Brooke A.
    Cliby, William A.
    Glaser, Gretchen E.
    Grassi, Tommaso
    Keeney, Gary L.
    Weaver, Amy L.
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
    Leitao, Mario M., Jr.
    Mariani, Andrea
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 155 (02) : 177 - 185
  • [30] Comparison of three lymph node staging schemes for predicting outcome in patients with gastric cancer
    Wang, X.
    Appleby, D. -H.
    Zhang, X.
    Gan, L.
    Wang, J. -J.
    Wan, F.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (04) : 505 - 514