Cone Beam Intraoperative Computed Tomography-based Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion

被引:5
|
作者
Safaee, Michael [1 ]
Oh, Taemin [1 ]
Pekmezci, Murat [2 ]
Clark, Aaron J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurol Surg, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthoped Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
来源
关键词
Medicine; Issue; 150; Image-guidance; minimally invasive; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; spinal surgery; intraoperative guidance; spinal fusion; SURGEON RADIATION-EXPOSURE; PEDICLE SCREW PLACEMENT; O-ARM; SPINE SURGERY; LUMBAR; NAVIGATION; OUTCOMES; TECHNOLOGY; SUBSIDENCE; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.3791/57830
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is commonly used for the treatment of spinal stenosis, degenerative disc disease, and spondylolisthesis. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approaches have been applied to this technique with an associated decrease in estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay, and infection rates, while preserving outcomes with traditional open surgery. Previous MIS TLIF techniques involve significant fluoroscopy that subjects the patient, surgeon, and operating room staff to non-trivial levels of radiation exposure, particularly for complex multi-level procedures. We present a technique that utilizes an intraoperative computed tomography (CT) scan to aid in placement of pedicle screws, followed by traditional fluoroscopy for confirmation of cage placement. Patients are positioned in the standard fashion and a reference arc is placed in the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) followed by intraoperative CT scan. This allows for imageguidance-based placement of pedicle screws through a one-inch skin incision on each side. Unlike traditional MIS-TLIF that requires significant fluoroscopic imaging during this stage, the operation can now be performed without any additional radiation exposure to the patient or operating room staff. After completion of the facetectomy and discectomy, final TLIF cage placement is confirmed with fluoroscopy. This technique has the potential to decrease operative time and minimize total radiation exposure.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Outpatient Setting
    Emami, Arash
    Faloon, Michael
    Issa, Kimona
    Shafa, Eiman
    Pourtaheri, Sina
    Sinha, Kumar
    Hwang, Ki S.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 39 (06) : E1218 - E1222
  • [22] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Elboghdady, Islam M.
    Naqvi, Abbas
    Jorgenson, Anton Y.
    Marquez-Lara, Alejandro
    Singh, Kern
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2014, 2 (10)
  • [23] The surgical technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Lawton, C. D.
    Smith, Z. A.
    Barnawi, A.
    Fessler, R. G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 55 (03) : 259 - 264
  • [24] Cone Beam computed tomography (CBCT) applications in image-guided minimally invasive procedures
    Serrano, E.
    Jose, J. Valcarcel
    Paez-Carpio, A.
    Matute-Gonzalez, M.
    Werner, M. F.
    Lopez-Rueda, A.
    RADIOLOGIA, 2025, 67 (01): : 38 - 53
  • [25] Ten-Step Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Under Computed Tomography-Based Intraoperative Navigation: Technical Report and Preliminary Outcomes in Mexico
    Quillo-Olvera, Javier
    Quillo-Resendiz, Javier
    Quillo-Olvera, Diego
    Barrera-Arreola, Michelle
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 19 (05) : 608 - 618
  • [26] Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography-Based Spinal Navigation in Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Feasibility, Technique, and Initial Results
    Park, Paul
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 11 (02) : 259 - 267
  • [27] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a technical description and review of the literature
    Vazan, Martin
    Gempt, Jens
    Meyer, Bernhard
    Buchmann, Niels
    Ryang, Yu-Mi
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2017, 159 (06) : 1137 - 1146
  • [28] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a technical description and review of the literature
    Martin Vazan
    Jens Gempt
    Bernhard Meyer
    Niels Buchmann
    Yu- Mi Ryang
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2017, 159 : 1137 - 1146
  • [29] Evidence-Based Review of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Is Minimally Invasive Better?
    Kaloostian, Paul E.
    Gokaslan, Ziya L.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 82 (1-2) : 65 - 67
  • [30] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Two Techniques
    Tender, G. C.
    Serban, D.
    CHIRURGIA, 2014, 109 (06) : 812 - 821