Which uncertainty is powerful to forecast crude oil market volatility? New evidence

被引:67
|
作者
Li, Xiafei [1 ]
Wei, Yu [2 ]
Chen, Xiaodan [2 ]
Ma, Feng [1 ]
Liang, Chao [1 ]
Chen, Wang [3 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Yunnan Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, 237 Longquan Rd, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[3] Yangtze Normal Univ, Coll Finance & Econ, Chongqing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Crude oil market volatility; GARCH‐ MIDAS; uncertainty indices; volatility forecasting; STOCK-MARKET; MACROECONOMIC FUNDAMENTALS; REALIZED VOLATILITY; PRICE VOLATILITY; ANYTHING BEAT; TIME-SERIES; SHORT-TERM; RETURNS; MODEL; SAMPLE;
D O I
10.1002/ijfe.2371
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper focuses on distinguishing the predictive power of five newly developed uncertainty indices, that is, global and US economic policy uncertainty (GEPU and US EPU), global geopolitical risk (GPR), US monetary policy uncertainty (MPU) and equity market volatility (EMV), on crude oil market volatility. We construct the extended GARCH-MIDAS models to assess the forecasting ability of these indices and then compare them with four commonly used oil volatility drivers: oil supply, oil demand, oil speculation and interest rate. Firstly, the in-sample analysis suggests that all uncertainty indices and traditional determinants have significant impacts on oil volatility. Secondly, the out-of-sample evaluations suggest that US MPU, EMV and EPU indices are more powerful than other predictors to improve the forecasting accuracy of crude oil volatility, and US EMV exhibits the best prediction ability. Then, we find that EPU and MPU indices are more effective in forecasting high volatility in crude oil market, while traditional determinants together with US EMV index are more helpful in predicting low oil volatility. Finally, the forecasts of bad oil volatility can be improved by all predictors except for GEPU index, while the forecasts of good oil volatility can only be enhanced by US MPU, EMV and EPU.
引用
收藏
页码:4279 / 4297
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Economic policy uncertainty and the Chinese stock market volatility: new evidence
    Li, Yu
    Ma, Feng
    Zhang, Yaojie
    Xiao, Zuoping
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2019, 51 (49) : 5398 - 5410
  • [42] Time-varying effects of global economic policy uncertainty shocks on crude oil price volatility : New evidence
    Lyu, Yongjian
    Tuo, Siwei
    Wei, Yu
    Yang, Mo
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2021, 70
  • [43] The volatility transmission between crude oil market and tanker freight market
    Dai, Lei
    Hu, Hao
    Tao, Yu
    Lee, Seungwon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SHIPPING AND TRANSPORT LOGISTICS, 2020, 12 (06) : 619 - 634
  • [44] Crude oil volatility index forecasting: New evidence based on positive and negative jumps from Chinese stock market
    Qiao, Gaoxiu
    Ma, Xuekun
    Jiang, Gongyue
    Wang, Lu
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2024, 92 : 415 - 437
  • [45] Forecasting crude oil market volatility: A Markov switching multifractal volatility approach
    Wang, Yudong
    Wu, Chongfeng
    Yang, Li
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2016, 32 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [46] New indices of adequate and excess speculation and their relationship with volatility in the crude oil futures market
    Shanker, Latha
    JOURNAL OF COMMODITY MARKETS, 2017, 5 : 18 - 35
  • [47] Forecasting crude oil market volatility: Further evidence using GARCH-class models
    Wei, Yu
    Wang, Yudong
    Huang, Dengshi
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2010, 32 (06) : 1477 - 1484
  • [48] Forecasting crude oil market volatility: A newspaper-based predictor regarding petroleum market volatility
    Song, Yixuan
    He, Mengxi
    Wang, Yudong
    Zhang, Yaojie
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2022, 79
  • [49] Crude oil price uncertainty and corporate investment: New global evidence
    Dinh Hoang Bach Phan
    Vuong Thao Tran
    Dat Thanh Nguyen
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 77 : 54 - 65
  • [50] Heterogeneous traders, liquidity, and volatility in crude oil futures market
    Haugom, Erik
    Ray, Rina
    JOURNAL OF COMMODITY MARKETS, 2017, 5 : 36 - 49