Validity and reliability of the Diagnostic Adaptive Behaviour Scale

被引:13
|
作者
Tasse, M. J. [1 ]
Schalock, R. L. [2 ]
Balboni, G. [3 ]
Spreat, S. [4 ]
Navas, P. [5 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Nisonger Ctr UCEDD, 1581 Dodd Dr, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Hastings Coll Law, Dept Psychol, Hastings, NE USA
[3] Univ Pisa, Dept Surg Med Mol & Crit Area Pathol, Pisa, Italy
[4] Woods Serv, Langhorne, PA USA
[5] Univ Zaragoza, Dept Psychol, Zaragoza, Spain
关键词
adaptive behaviour; diagnosis; intellectual disability; reliability; validity;
D O I
10.1111/jir.12239
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Background The Diagnostic Adaptive Behaviour Scale (DABS) is a new standardised adaptive behaviour measure that provides information for evaluating limitations in adaptive behaviour for the purpose of determining a diagnosis of intellectual disability. This article presents validity evidence and reliability data for the DABS. Method Validity evidence was based on comparing DABS scores with scores obtained on the Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale, second edition. The stability of the test scores was measured using a test and retest, and inter-rater reliability was assessed by computing the inter-respondent concordance. Results The DABS convergent validity coefficients ranged from 0.70 to 0.84, while the test-retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.78 to 0.95, and the inter-rater concordance as measured by intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.61 to 0.87. Conclusions All obtained validity and reliability indicators were strong and comparable with the validity and reliability coefficients of the most commonly used adaptive behaviour instruments. These results and the advantages of the DABS for clinician and researcher use are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 88
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reliability and validity of the sexual pressure scale
    Jones, Rachel
    [J]. RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2006, 29 (04) : 281 - 293
  • [32] The Validity and Reliability of Biology Attitude Scale
    Gurbuzoglu Yalmanci, Sibel
    [J]. PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI EGITIM FAKULTESI DERGISI-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2016, (40): : 248 - 262
  • [33] DEVELOPMENT, RELIABILITY, AND VALIDITY OF A DISSOCIATION SCALE
    BERNSTEIN, EM
    PUTNAM, FW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 1986, 174 (12) : 727 - 735
  • [34] The Validity and Reliability of the Cognitive Flexibility Scale
    Celikkaleli, Oner
    [J]. EGITIM VE BILIM-EDUCATION AND SCIENCE, 2014, 39 (176): : 339 - 346
  • [35] NOTES ON THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE DOGMATISM SCALE
    ZAGONA, SV
    ZURCHER, LA
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1965, 16 (03) : 1234 - 1236
  • [36] Reliability and validity of the Parenting Scale of Inconsistency
    Yoshizumi, Takahiro
    Murase, Satomi
    Murakami, Takashi
    Takai, Jiro
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2006, 99 (01) : 74 - 84
  • [37] Reliability and Validity of Constipation Severity Scale
    Kaya, Nurten
    Turan, Nuray
    [J]. TURKIYE KLINIKLERI TIP BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2011, 31 (06): : 1491 - 1501
  • [38] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF A DEPRESSION SCALE FOR SCHIZOPHRENICS
    ADDINGTON, D
    ADDINGTON, J
    MATICKATYNDALE, E
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 1991, 4 (03) : 247 - 247
  • [39] VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE CONSTIPATION ASSESSMENT SCALE
    MCMILLAN, SC
    WILLIAMS, FA
    [J]. CANCER NURSING, 1989, 12 (03) : 183 - 188
  • [40] Validity and reliability of the swallowing safety scale
    Ludlow, Christy L.
    Sonies, B. C.
    Humbert, I. A.
    Crujido, L.
    Martin, S. B.
    Lowell, S. Y.
    [J]. DYSPHAGIA, 2007, 22 (04) : 395 - 395