DEA altruism and exclusiveness cross-efficiency evaluation models

被引:1
|
作者
Li, L. [1 ]
Dai, W. [2 ]
Chu, J. [3 ]
Liu, X. [4 ]
Wang, Y. [5 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Sch Business, Appl Technol Coll, Suzhou 215325, Peoples R China
[2] Soochow Univ, Soochow Think Tank & Dongwu Business Sch, Res Ctr Smarter Supply Chain, Suzhou 215012, Peoples R China
[3] Cent South Univ, Sch Business, Changsha 410083, Hunan, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Hefei 230026, Peoples R China
[5] Jiangnan Univ, Sch Business, Wuxi 214122, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA); Cross-efficiency evaluation; Altruism model; Exclusiveness model; Efficiency; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; ALLOCATION; PRIORITY;
D O I
10.24200/sci.2020.21994
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
As an effective method for evaluating efficiency, cross-efficiency evaluation has been widely used to assess the performance of Decision-Making Units (DMUs). However, non-uniqueness of the optimal weights problem reduces efficiency of this method. To address this problem, scholars have proposed using secondary goals and they have developed numerous models with this consideration. In this paper, two new secondary goal models are presented in order to further extend the above-mentioned existing models. The proposed altruism cross-efficiency model is specifically applicable when the evaluated DMU cooperates with other DMUs, since it maximizes the peer-efficiency scores of other DMUs. On the other hand, the exclusiveness cross-efficiency model is utilized when the evaluated DMU is competing with other DMUs. This model minimizes the peer-efficiency scores of other DMUs. Compared with the existing approaches, our approach ensures that the peer-efficiencies generated by each DMU are maximized (or minimized) under the premise that the minimum (or maximum) peer-efficiency among the DMUs is maximized (or minimized). More importantly, our proposed algorithm guarantees the uniqueness of the optimal weights and the set of cross-efficiency scores. Two numerical examples were used to verify the effectiveness of the proposed model. (C) 2020 Sharif University of Technology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2499 / 2513
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The DEA Game Cross-Efficiency Model and Its Nash Equilibrium
    Liang, Liang
    Wu, Jie
    Cook, Wade D.
    Zhu, Joe
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2008, 56 (05) : 1278 - 1288
  • [42] Fixed cost and resource allocation based on DEA cross-efficiency
    Du, Juan
    Cook, Wade D.
    Liang, Liang
    Zhu, Joe
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 235 (01) : 206 - 214
  • [43] Methods and applications of DEA cross-efficiency: Review and future perspectives
    Wu, Jie
    Sun, Jiasen
    Liang, Liang
    FRONTIERS OF ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2021, 8 (02) : 199 - 211
  • [44] Methods and applications of DEA cross-efficiency: Review and future perspectives
    Jie WU
    Jiasen SUN
    Liang LIANG
    Frontiers of Engineering Management, 2021, (02) : 199 - 211
  • [45] Methods and applications of DEA cross-efficiency: Review and future perspectives
    Jie Wu
    Jiasen Sun
    Liang Liang
    Frontiers of Engineering Management, 2021, 8 : 199 - 211
  • [46] Weight determination in the cross-efficiency evaluation
    Wang, Ying-Ming
    Chin, Kwai-Sang
    Jiang, Peng
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 61 (03) : 497 - 502
  • [47] An improvement in DEA cross-efficiency aggregation based on the Shannon entropy
    Song, Lianlian
    Liu, Fan
    INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (02) : 705 - 714
  • [48] Maximum appreciative cross-efficiency in DEA: A new ranking method
    Oukil, Amar
    Amin, Gholam R.
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 81 : 14 - 21
  • [49] In the determination of weight sets to compute cross-efficiency ratios in DEA
    Lam, K. F.
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2010, 61 (01) : 134 - 143
  • [50] On the DEA total weight flexibility and the aggregation in cross-efficiency evaluations
    Ruiz, Jose L.
    Sirvent, Inmaculada
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 223 (03) : 732 - 738