Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors

被引：74

作者：

Resnik, David B. ^{[1
]}

Elmore, Susan A. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] NIEHS, NIH, Box 12233,Mail Drop CU 03, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA

[2] NIEHS, Natl Toxicol Program, NIH, POB 12233, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA

来源：

SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS | 2016年 / 22卷 / 01期

基金：

美国国家卫生研究院;

关键词：

Peer review; Quality; Fairness; Integrity; Ethics; Reliability; Bias; Editors; Publication; MASKING AUTHOR IDENTITY; RETRACTED ARTICLE. SEE; PUBLICATION BIAS; GENDER BIAS; RECOMMENDATIONS; IMPROVE; MANUSCRIPT; RELIABILITY; FATE;

D O I：

10.1007/s11948-015-9625-5

中图分类号：

B82 [伦理学（道德学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

A growing body of literature has identified potential problems that can compromise the quality, fairness, and integrity of journal peer review, including inadequate review, inconsistent reviewer reports, reviewer biases, and ethical transgressions by reviewers. We examine the evidence concerning these problems and discuss proposed reforms, including double-blind and open review. Regardless of the outcome of additional research or attempts at reforming the system, it is clear that editors are the linchpin of peer review, since they make decisions that have a significant impact on the process and its outcome. We consider some of the steps editors should take to promote quality, fairness and integrity in different stages of the peer review process and make some recommendations for editorial conduct and decision-making.

引用

页码：169 / 188

页数：20

共 50 条

[41] Authors' and Editors' Perspectives on Peer Review Quality in Three Scholarly Nursing Journals
Shattell, Mona M.
Chinn, Peggy
Thomas, Sandra P.
Cowling, W. Richard, III
[J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2010, 42 (01) : 58 - 65
[42] The role of peer review in internal quality assurance in cytopathology
Zardawi, IM
Bennett, G
Jain, S
Brown, M
[J]. PATHOLOGY, 1998, 30 (03) : 309 - 313
[43] Peer review in the classroom: student perceptions, peer feedback quality and the role of assessment
Gaynor, James W.
[J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 45 (05) : 758 - 775
[44] Assuring the quality of scholarly South African journals: An experiment in journal peer review
Crewe, Robin
[J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2020, 116 (9-10) : 14 - 16
[45] The relationship of previous training and experience of journal peer reviewers to subsequent review quality
Callaham, Michael L.
Tercier, John
[J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2007, 4 (01): : 32 - 40
[46] Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors
Schroter, S
Tite, L
Hutchings, A
Black, N
[J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (03): : 314 - 317
[47] The Growth of the International Journal of Qualitative Methods: Why Readers and Writers Need Good Peer Review, Reviewers, and Editors
Clark, Alexander M.
Sousa, Bailey J.
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2017, 16 (01):
[48] An empirical exploration of reviewers' and editors' roles fostering high quality research during peer review
Ross, Roxanne
Heggestad, Eric D.
[J]. INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2020, 13 (01): : 32 - 36
[49] Peer review and international collaboration: the bedrock of a learned journal, the way forward for quality care
Bishop, Veronica
[J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN NURSING, 2010, 15 (02) : 99 - 100
[50] Editors' Perspectives on Enhancing Manuscript Quality and Editorial Decisions Through Peer Review and Reviewer Development
Janke, Kristin K.
Bzowyckyj, Andrew S.
Traynor, Andrew P.
[J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2017, 81 (04)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →