A study on the bursting point of Bitcoin based on the BSADF and LPPLS methods

被引:22
|
作者
Yao, Can-Zhong [1 ]
Li, Hong-Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] South China Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Finance, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
关键词
Bitcoin; Bubble periods; LPPLS; GSADF;
D O I
10.1016/j.najef.2020.101280
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We aim to reveal the characteristics and mechanism of the Bitcoin bubble in 2019. First, we identify the period during which two important Bitcoin bubbles occurred based on the generalized supremum augmented Dickey-Fuller (GSADF) method. There are two significant bubble cycles. The first bubble lasted approximately 26 days from November 25, 2017, to December 21, 2017, while the second bubble lasted approximately one week from June 22 to June 29, 2019. The occurrence of the first bubble was related to the considerable expansion of initial coin offerings (ICOs) in 2017, while the formation of the second bubble was affected by the release of Libra. Second, as the GSADF method cannot be used to accurately infer the time at which a bubble bursts, we employ the log-periodic power law singularity (LPPLS) model for this purpose. We verify that the LPPLS method can not only infer the timing of a bubble burst but also shows stable results. Finally, we demonstrate the implications of the 2019 bubble. During the 2019 bubble, due to the increased supervision of European and American governments and the impact of hedging assets, the bubble's duration was shorter, and the positive feedback mechanism was not as strong as that of the 2017 bubble. In addition, the oscillating frequency of the bubble in 2019 was low and unstable, which means that it would be more beneficial for investors to hold the currency for a long time.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Alternative Methods for Estimating Plane Parameters Based on a Point Cloud
    Stryczek, Roman
    MEASUREMENT SCIENCE REVIEW, 2017, 17 (06): : 282 - 289
  • [42] Perturbed fixed point iterative methods based on pattern structure
    Nikazad, T.
    Abbasi, M.
    MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN THE APPLIED SCIENCES, 2018, 41 (14) : 5582 - 5592
  • [43] Multifactorial comparative study of spatial point pattern analysis methods
    Wallet, F
    Dussert, C
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1997, 187 (03) : 437 - 447
  • [44] A Study on the Effective Preprocessing Methods for Accelerating Point Cloud Registration
    Jang, Chungsu
    Kim, Yongmin
    Kim, Taehyun
    Choi, Sunyong
    Koh, Jinwoo
    Lee, Seungkeun
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 39 (01) : 111 - 127
  • [45] EXTREME POINT METHODS IN THE STUDY OF ISOMETRIES ON CERTAIN NONCOMMUTATIVE SPACES
    De Jager, Pierre
    Conradie, Jurie
    GLASGOW MATHEMATICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 64 (02) : 462 - 483
  • [46] Practical Blockchain-Based Steganographic Communication Via Adversarial AI: A Case Study In Bitcoin
    Wang, Minxian
    Zhang, Zijian
    He, Jialing
    Gao, Feng
    Li, Meng
    Xu, Shubin
    Zhu, Liehuang
    COMPUTER JOURNAL, 2022, 65 (11): : 2926 - 2938
  • [47] An Empirical Study on Modeling and Prediction of Bitcoin Prices With Bayesian Neural Networks Based on Blockchain Information
    Jang, Huisu
    Lee, Jaewook
    IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 5427 - 5437
  • [48] Study on Bursting Liability of Fiber Reinforced Shaft Lining Concrete Based on Temperature and Compound Salt
    Zhou Y.
    Liu J.
    Ji H.
    Fu S.
    Gu Y.
    Cailiao Daobao/Materials Reports, 2019, 33 (08): : 2671 - 2676
  • [49] LiDAR point-cloud processing based on projection methods: a comparison
    Yang, Guidong
    Mentasti, Simone
    Bersani, Mattia
    Wang, Yafei
    Braghin, Francesco
    Cheli, Federico
    2020 AEIT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGIES FOR AUTOMOTIVE (AEIT AUTOMOTIVE), 2020,
  • [50] Interior-point methods based on kernel functions for symmetric optimization
    Vieira, Manuel V. C.
    OPTIMIZATION METHODS & SOFTWARE, 2012, 27 (03): : 513 - 537