A study on the bursting point of Bitcoin based on the BSADF and LPPLS methods

被引:22
|
作者
Yao, Can-Zhong [1 ]
Li, Hong-Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] South China Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Finance, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
关键词
Bitcoin; Bubble periods; LPPLS; GSADF;
D O I
10.1016/j.najef.2020.101280
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We aim to reveal the characteristics and mechanism of the Bitcoin bubble in 2019. First, we identify the period during which two important Bitcoin bubbles occurred based on the generalized supremum augmented Dickey-Fuller (GSADF) method. There are two significant bubble cycles. The first bubble lasted approximately 26 days from November 25, 2017, to December 21, 2017, while the second bubble lasted approximately one week from June 22 to June 29, 2019. The occurrence of the first bubble was related to the considerable expansion of initial coin offerings (ICOs) in 2017, while the formation of the second bubble was affected by the release of Libra. Second, as the GSADF method cannot be used to accurately infer the time at which a bubble bursts, we employ the log-periodic power law singularity (LPPLS) model for this purpose. We verify that the LPPLS method can not only infer the timing of a bubble burst but also shows stable results. Finally, we demonstrate the implications of the 2019 bubble. During the 2019 bubble, due to the increased supervision of European and American governments and the impact of hedging assets, the bubble's duration was shorter, and the positive feedback mechanism was not as strong as that of the 2017 bubble. In addition, the oscillating frequency of the bubble in 2019 was low and unstable, which means that it would be more beneficial for investors to hold the currency for a long time.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Studying Bitcoin Privacy Attacks and Their Impact on Bitcoin-Based Identity Methods
    Ghesmati, Simin
    Fdhila, Walid
    Weippl, Edgar
    BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT: BLOCKCHAIN AND ROBOTIC PROCESS AUTOMATION FORUM, BPM 2021 BLOCKCHAIN AND RPA FORUM, 2021, 428 : 85 - 101
  • [2] An Event Analysis of Bitcoin Based on a Novel DRE Methods
    Yao YUE
    Yuying SUN
    Kuo YANG
    Shouyang WANG
    Journal of Systems Science and Information, 2023, 11 (02) : 139 - 159
  • [3] Bitcoin investment: a mixed methods study of investment motivations
    Mattke, Jens
    Maier, Christian
    Reis, Lea
    Weitzel, Tim
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2021, 30 (03) : 261 - 285
  • [4] Bursting With Possibilities - an Empirical Study of Credit-Based Bursting Cloud Instance Types
    Leitner, Philipp
    Scheuner, Joel
    2015 IEEE/ACM 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UTILITY AND CLOUD COMPUTING (UCC), 2015, : 227 - 236
  • [5] Manipulation of the Bitcoin market: an agent-based study
    Peter Fratrič
    Giovanni Sileno
    Sander Klous
    Tom van Engers
    Financial Innovation, 8
  • [6] Manipulation of the Bitcoin market: an agent-based study
    Fratric, Peter
    Sileno, Giovanni
    Klous, Sander
    van Engers, Tom
    FINANCIAL INNOVATION, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [7] Study on Optical Dot Gain Model Based on Point Spread and Probability Methods
    Xu, Junfei
    Xu, Jinlin
    Xu, Yongchi
    FRONTIERS OF MANUFACTURING AND DESIGN SCIENCE III, PTS 1 AND 2, 2013, 271-272 : 1434 - +
  • [8] Gold and Bitcoin Optimal Portfolio Research and Analysis Based on Machine-Learning Methods
    Li, Jingjing
    Rao, Xinge
    Li, Xianyi
    Guan, Sihai
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (21)
  • [9] Boundary meshfree methods based on the boundary point interpolation methods
    Liu, GR
    Gu, YT
    BOUNDARY ELEMENTS XXIV: INCORPORATING MESHLESS SOLUTIONS, 2002, 13 : 57 - 66
  • [10] Boundary meshfree methods based on the boundary point interpolation methods
    Liu, GR
    Gu, YT
    ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WITH BOUNDARY ELEMENTS, 2004, 28 (05) : 475 - 487