Feasibility Study to Identify Machine Learning Predictors for a Virtual School Environment: Virtual Reality Stroop Task

被引:4
|
作者
McMahan, Timothy [1 ]
Duffield, Tyler [2 ]
Parsons, Thomas D. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Texas, iCenter Affect Neurotechnol, Denton, TX 76205 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR USA
来源
关键词
adaptive virtual environments; neuropsychological assessment; cognitive; machine learning; adaptive assessment; ADHD; VARIABILITY; DEMANDS;
D O I
10.3389/frvir.2021.673191
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
An adaptive virtual school environment can offer cognitive assessments (e.g., Virtual Classroom Stroop Task) with user-specific distraction levels that mimic the conditions found in a student's actual classroom. Former iterations of the virtual reality classroom Stroop tasks did not adapt to user performance in the face of distractors. While advances in virtual reality-based assessments provide potential for increasing assessment of cognitive processes, less has been done to develop these simulations into personalized virtual environments for improved assessment. An adaptive virtual school environment offers the potential for dynamically adapting the difficulty level (e.g., level and amount of distractors) specific to the user's performance. This study aimed to identify machine learning predictors that could be utilized for cognitive performance classifiers, from participants (N = 60) using three classification techniques: Support Vector Machines (SVM), Naive Bayes (NB), and k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN). Participants were categorized into either high performing or low performing categories based upon their average calculated throughput performance on tasks assessing their attentional processes during a distraction condition. The predictors for the classifiers used the average cognitive response time and average motor response dwell time (amount of time response button was pressed) for each section of the virtual reality-based Stroop task totaling 24 predictors. Using 10-fold cross validation during the training of the classifiers, revealed that the SVM (86.7%) classifier was the most robust classifier followed by Naive Bayes (81.7%) and KNN (76.7%) for identifying cognitive performance. Results from the classifiers suggests that we can use average response time and dwell time as predictors to adapt the social cues and distractors in the environment to the appropriate difficulty level for the user.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Contextual structure as an approach to the study of virtual reality learning environment
    Mukasheva, Manargul
    Kornilov, Iurii
    Beisembayev, Gani
    Soroko, Nataliia
    Sarsimbayeva, Saule
    Omirzakova, Aisara
    [J]. COGENT EDUCATION, 2023, 10 (01):
  • [22] Cognitive load Classification with a Stroop task in Virtual Reality based on Physiological data
    Souchet, Alexis D.
    Diallo, Mamadou Lamarana
    Lourdeaux, Domitile
    [J]. 2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MIXED AND AUGMENTED REALITY (ISMAR 2022), 2022, : 656 - 665
  • [23] Feasibility study of virtual reality in audiovisual environment: Assessment of university cafeteria acoustic environment
    Wen, Zehua
    Guo, Xiaoyang
    [J]. COMPUTER ANIMATION AND VIRTUAL WORLDS, 2024, 35 (02)
  • [24] Virtual Reality Learning Environment with Haptic Gloves
    Civelek, Turhan
    Fuhrmann, Arnulph
    [J]. 2022 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT AND STUDIES, ICEDS 2022, 2022, : 32 - 36
  • [25] EnLighten: A Photovoltaics Learning Environment in Virtual Reality
    Arntz, Alexander
    Kessler, Dustin
    Eimler, Sabrina C.
    [J]. IEEE 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES (ICALT 2021), 2021, : 221 - 223
  • [26] Learning to Juggle in an Interactive Virtual Reality Environment
    Kahlert, Tobias
    van de Camp, Florian
    Stiefelhagen, Rainer
    [J]. HCI INTERNATIONAL 2015 - POSTERS' EXTENDED ABSTRACTS, PT I, 2015, 528 : 196 - 201
  • [27] The Design of Distributed Virtual Reality Learning Environment
    Zhao Chengling
    Chai Langlang
    Zhao Qianqian
    Zhu Wanxia
    [J]. ICAIE 2009: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND EDUCATION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 696 - 700
  • [28] A virtual reality environment for e-learning
    Ouyang, X
    Zhao, Z
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY-XVI, 2001, : 173 - 176
  • [29] Machine learning distinguishes neurosurgical skill levels in a virtual reality tumor resection task
    Samaneh Siyar
    Hamed Azarnoush
    Saeid Rashidi
    Alexander Winkler-Schwartz
    Vincent Bissonnette
    Nirros Ponnudurai
    Rolando F. Del Maestro
    [J]. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2020, 58 : 1357 - 1367
  • [30] A Feasibility Study on Using Virtual Reality for Understanding Deficiencies of High School Students
    Manouchou, Elena
    Stavroulia, Kalliopi-Evangelia
    Ruiz-Harisiou, Antri
    Georgiou, Kyriakos
    Sella, Francesca
    Lanitis, Andreas
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH MEDITERRANEAN ELECTROTECHNICAL CONFERENCE MELECON 2016, 2016,